• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床和遗传因素对接受氯吡格雷和普拉格雷治疗的冠心病患者高血小板反应性的差异影响

Differential Impact of Clinical and Genetic Factors on High Platelet Reactivity in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Treated with Clopidogrel and Prasugrel.

作者信息

Saito Yuichi, Nishi Takeshi, Wakabayashi Shinichi, Ohno Yuji, Kitahara Hideki, Ariyoshi Noritaka, Kobayashi Yoshio

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine.

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine and Stanford Cardiovascular Institute.

出版信息

J Atheroscler Thromb. 2022 Jul 1;29(7):1031-1039. doi: 10.5551/jat.63035. Epub 2021 Jul 8.

DOI:10.5551/jat.63035
PMID:34234079
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9252642/
Abstract

AIM

High platelet reactivity (HPR) is associated with increased risks of thrombotic events in patients with coronary artery disease. The recently developed ABCD-GENE score identified five clinical and genetic factors (age, body mass index, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and the CYP2C19 loss-of-function allele) for HPR, although the significance of various stages of each factor is unclear.

METHODS

Four prospective studies were pooled, in which platelet reactivity was measured using the VerifyNow assay with clopidogrel and prasugrel; genotyping of CYP2C19 was also performed. Each component of the ABCD-GENE score was divided into three subcategories. VerifyNow P2Y12 reactivity units >208 were defined as HPR.

RESULTS

A total of 184 patients were included, of which 111 (60%) and 51 (28%) had HPR with clopidogrel and prasugrel. Chronic kidney disease had an impact on HPR on both clopidogrel and prasugrel, whereas the impact of diabetes was more evident in patients treated with prasugrel. Although the number of CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles was clearly associated with a likelihood of HPR with clopidogrel, P2Y12 reactivity units with prasugrel treatment were also significantly and progressively higher in patients with more CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical and genetic factors had a differential effect on a P2Y12 inhibitor reactivity with clopidogrel and prasugrel in patients with coronary artery disease. The severity of the factors also had a different impact on HPR.

摘要

目的

高血小板反应性(HPR)与冠心病患者血栓形成事件风险增加相关。最近开发的ABCD-GENE评分确定了五个与HPR相关的临床和遗传因素(年龄、体重指数、慢性肾病、糖尿病和CYP2C19功能缺失等位基因),但每个因素不同阶段的意义尚不清楚。

方法

汇总四项前瞻性研究,其中使用VerifyNow检测法测定氯吡格雷和普拉格雷治疗后的血小板反应性;同时对CYP2C19进行基因分型。将ABCD-GENE评分的每个组成部分分为三个亚类。VerifyNow P2Y12反应单位>208被定义为HPR。

结果

共纳入184例患者,其中111例(60%)和51例(28%)分别在使用氯吡格雷和普拉格雷治疗后出现HPR。慢性肾病对氯吡格雷和普拉格雷治疗后的HPR均有影响,而糖尿病对普拉格雷治疗患者的影响更为明显。虽然CYP2C19功能缺失等位基因数量与氯吡格雷治疗后发生HPR的可能性明显相关,但在携带更多CYP2C19功能缺失等位基因的患者中,普拉格雷治疗后的P2Y12反应单位也显著且逐步升高。

结论

临床和遗传因素对冠心病患者使用氯吡格雷和普拉格雷时的P2Y12抑制剂反应性有不同影响。这些因素的严重程度对HPR的影响也有所不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a266/9252642/7de074c52b58/29_63035_1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a266/9252642/7de074c52b58/29_63035_1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a266/9252642/7de074c52b58/29_63035_1.jpg

相似文献

1
Differential Impact of Clinical and Genetic Factors on High Platelet Reactivity in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Treated with Clopidogrel and Prasugrel.临床和遗传因素对接受氯吡格雷和普拉格雷治疗的冠心病患者高血小板反应性的差异影响
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2022 Jul 1;29(7):1031-1039. doi: 10.5551/jat.63035. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
2
Derivation of a Novel Scoring System Predicting High Platelet Reactivity on Prasugrel in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.一种预测冠心病患者普拉格雷高血小板反应的新型评分系统的推导。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2022 Nov 1;29(11):1625-1633. doi: 10.5551/jat.63300. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
3
Transferring from clopidogrel loading dose to prasugrel loading dose in acute coronary syndrome patients. High on-treatment platelet reactivity analysis of the TRIPLET trial.从氯吡格雷负荷剂量转换为普拉格雷负荷剂量治疗急性冠脉综合征患者。TRIPLET 试验的治疗中血小板反应性高分析。
Thromb Haemost. 2014 Aug;112(2):311-22. doi: 10.1160/TH13-09-0747. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
4
Comparative effects of different antiplatelet strategies in carriers of CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles: a network meta-analysis.携带 CYP2C19 失活等位基因的患者中不同抗血小板策略的比较效果:网状荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2024 Oct 4;10(6):526-536. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvae036.
5
Increased platelet inhibition after switching from maintenance clopidogrel to prasugrel in Japanese patients with stable coronary artery disease.在日本稳定性冠状动脉疾病患者中,从维持性使用氯吡格雷转换为使用普拉格雷后血小板抑制作用增强。
Circ J. 2015;79(11):2439-44. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-15-0546. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
6
Derivation, Validation, and Prognostic Utility of a Prediction Rule for Nonresponse to Clopidogrel: The ABCD-GENE Score.抗血小板药物氯吡格雷无应答预测评分:ABCD-GENE 评分的推导、验证及预后价值。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Mar 9;13(5):606-617. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.01.226.
7
Pharmacodynamic study of prasugrel or clopidogrel in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome with CYP2C19 genetic variants undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PRAISE-GENE trial).普拉格雷或氯吡格雷在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的伴有CYP2C19基因变异的非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征中的药效学研究(PRAISE-GENE试验)
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Apr 15;305:11-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.01.058. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
8
High residual platelet reactivity after switching from clopidogrel to low-dose prasugrel in Japanese patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis.日本终末期肾病血液透析患者由氯吡格雷换用低剂量普拉格雷后血小板高反应性残留。
J Cardiol. 2019 Jan;73(1):51-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
9
Pharmacodynamic effect of switching therapy in patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity and genotype variation with high clopidogrel Dose versus prasugrel: the RESET GENE trial.高反应性血小板患者治疗中转换治疗的药效学效应及高剂量氯吡格雷与普拉格雷基因型变异:RESET GENE 试验。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Oct;5(5):698-704. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.972463. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
10
Clopidogrel utilization in patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes mellitus: should we determine CYP2C19*2 genotype?冠心病合并糖尿病患者中氯吡格雷的应用:我们应该检测CYP2C19*2基因型吗?
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Dec;74(12):1567-1574. doi: 10.1007/s00228-018-2530-5. Epub 2018 Aug 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of clopidogrel vs. ticagrelor based on the ABCD-GENE score in acute coronary syndrome patients following percutaneous coronary intervention.基于ABCD-GENE评分比较氯吡格雷与替格瑞洛在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的有效性。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jun 11;16:1606327. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1606327. eCollection 2025.
2
Effects of Body Mass Index and Body Weight on Plasma Concentration of Ticagrelor and Platelet Aggregation Rate in Patients with Unstable Angina in a Chinese Han Population.体重指数和体重对中国汉族不稳定型心绞痛患者替格瑞洛血浆浓度及血小板聚集率的影响
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Mar 4;25(3):83. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2503083. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Optical coherence tomography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a review of current clinical applications.光学相干断层成像引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:当前临床应用综述。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2021 Apr;36(2):169-177. doi: 10.1007/s12928-020-00745-4. Epub 2021 Jan 17.
2
Validation of the ABCD-GENE score to identify high platelet reactivity in east Asian patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.验证 ABCD-GENE 评分在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的东亚患者中识别血小板高反应性的价值。
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Mar 15;327:15-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.11.022. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
3
Contemporary coronary drug-eluting and coated stents: a mini-review.
Comparative Effects of Genetic and Nongenetic Factors in Antithrombotic Strategy.
抗栓策略中遗传因素与非遗传因素的比较效应
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2023 Dec 1;30(12):1763-1765. doi: 10.5551/jat.ED242. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
4
Differential Impact of Clinical Factors for Predicting High Platelet Reactivity on Clinical Outcomes in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Treated With Clopidogrel and Prasugrel.临床因素对氯吡格雷和普拉格雷治疗急性心肌梗死患者高血小板反应性预测对临床结局的影响差异。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2023 Dec 1;30(12):1791-1802. doi: 10.5551/jat.64217. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
5
Derivation of a Novel Scoring System Predicting High Platelet Reactivity on Prasugrel in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.一种预测冠心病患者普拉格雷高血小板反应的新型评分系统的推导。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2022 Nov 1;29(11):1625-1633. doi: 10.5551/jat.63300. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
当代冠状动脉药物洗脱和涂层支架:小型综述。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2021 Jan;36(1):20-22. doi: 10.1007/s12928-020-00731-w. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
4
Comparison Between Clopidogrel and Prasugrel Associated With CYP2C19 Genotypes in Patients Receiving Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in a Japanese Population.在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的日本人群中,比较氯吡格雷和普拉格雷与 CYP2C19 基因型的相关性。
Circ J. 2020 Aug 25;84(9):1575-1581. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0254. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
5
Relationship Between Platelet Reactivity and Ischemic and Bleeding Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in East Asian Patients: 1-Year Results of the PENDULUM Registry.东亚患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后血小板反应性与缺血和出血事件的关系:PENDULUM 登记研究的 1 年结果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 May 18;9(10):e015439. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015439. Epub 2020 May 12.
6
Derivation, Validation, and Prognostic Utility of a Prediction Rule for Nonresponse to Clopidogrel: The ABCD-GENE Score.抗血小板药物氯吡格雷无应答预测评分:ABCD-GENE 评分的推导、验证及预后价值。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Mar 9;13(5):606-617. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.01.226.
7
Dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease: from the past to the future prospective.冠状动脉疾病中的双联抗血小板治疗:从过去到未来展望
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2020 Apr;35(2):117-129. doi: 10.1007/s12928-020-00642-w. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
8
Antithrombotic therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention from the Japanese perspective.从日本视角看经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的抗栓治疗
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2020 Jan;35(1):19-29. doi: 10.1007/s12928-019-00633-6. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
9
Update on Antithrombotic Therapy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后抗栓治疗的最新进展
Intern Med. 2020 Feb 1;59(3):311-321. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.3685-19. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
10
Clinical expert consensus document on standards for measurements and assessment of intravascular ultrasound from the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.日本心血管介入与治疗学会关于血管内超声测量与评估标准的临床专家共识文件。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2020 Jan;35(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s12928-019-00625-6. Epub 2019 Sep 30.