Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
J Endourol. 2021 Dec;35(12):1779-1784. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0213.
Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for completely endophytic renal tumors is challenging because of the tumor complexity. The enucleation technique is an ideal resection method to maximally preserve the renal parenchyma. In the present study, we investigated the surgical outcomes of RAPN for completely endophytic renal tumors and compared them between the enucleation and standard resection techniques. One hundred and forty-four patients who underwent RAPN for completely endophytic tumors were the subjects of this study. The subjects were divided into two groups according to the Surface-Intermediate-Base margin score (SIB score): the enucleation group (SIB score 0-2) and the standard resection group (SIB score 3-5). To minimize selection bias between the two surgical methods, patient variables such as age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, tumor size, RENAL nephrometry score (RENAL NS), and preoperative renal function were adjusted using 1:1 propensity score matching. Of the 144 patients, 72 were assigned to the enucleation group and 72 to the standard resection group. After matching, 45 patients were included in each group. The mean tumor size was 26-27 mm and the mean RENAL NS was 9.0-9.1, after matching. The enucleation group showed significantly better preservation of the estimated glomerular filtration rate in the early postoperative period (-4.9% -16%, = 0.0005) and at 6-12 months after surgery (-4.9% -9.2%, = 0.0327) than the standard resection group. In addition, a shorter operation time (140 167 minutes, = 0.0028) was observed in the enucleation group. Other outcomes, including estimated blood loss, positive surgical margin rate, incidence rate of complications, and length of hospital stay, were not significantly different between the two groups. The enucleation technique showed better surgical outcomes for completely endophytic renal tumors in terms of preservation of renal function and operation time than the standard resection technique.
机器人辅助腹腔镜部分肾切除术(RAPN)治疗完全内生性肾肿瘤具有挑战性,因为肿瘤的复杂性。剜除技术是最大限度保留肾实质的理想切除方法。本研究探讨了 RAPN 治疗完全内生性肾肿瘤的手术结果,并比较了剜除术与标准切除术之间的差异。
本研究纳入了 144 例接受 RAPN 治疗完全内生性肿瘤的患者。根据表面-中间-基底切缘评分(SIB 评分)将患者分为两组:剜除组(SIB 评分 0-2)和标准切除组(SIB 评分 3-5)。为了最大程度地减少两种手术方法之间的选择偏倚,通过 1:1 倾向评分匹配调整了患者变量,如年龄、性别、体重指数、美国麻醉医师协会评分、肿瘤大小、肾脏分段评分(RENAL NS)和术前肾功能。
在 144 例患者中,72 例患者被分配到剜除组,72 例患者被分配到标准切除组。匹配后,每组纳入 45 例患者。平均肿瘤大小为 26-27mm,平均 RENAL NS 为 9.0-9.1。剜除组术后早期(-4.9%至-16%,=0.0005)和术后 6-12 个月(-4.9%至-9.2%,=0.0327)肾小球滤过率保留情况明显优于标准切除组。此外,剜除组的手术时间更短(140 至 167 分钟,=0.0028)。两组的估计出血量、阳性切缘率、并发症发生率和住院时间无显著差异。
在保留肾功能和手术时间方面,剜除术比标准切除术在治疗完全内生性肾肿瘤方面具有更好的手术结果。