• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肿瘤剜除术治疗 T1 期肾肿瘤:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Tumor enucleation for the treatment of T1 renal tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.

Department of Nephrology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.

出版信息

Investig Clin Urol. 2022 Mar;63(2):126-139. doi: 10.4111/icu.20210361.

DOI:10.4111/icu.20210361
PMID:35244986
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8902429/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of tumor enucleation (TE) compared with partial nephrectomy (PN) for T1 renal cell carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

According to protocol, we searched multiple data sources for published and unpublished randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies (NRSs) in any language. We performed systematic review and meta-analysis according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and rated the certainty of the evidence (CoE) using the GRADE framework.

RESULTS

We are uncertain about the effects of TE on perioperative (mean difference [MD] 3.38, 95% CI 1.52 to 5.23; I²=68%; 4 NRSs; 942 participants; very low CoE) and long-term (MD 2.31, 95% CI -1.40 to 6.01; I²=57%; 4 NRSs; 542 participants; very low CoE) residual renal function. TE may result in little to no difference in short-term residual renal function (MD 1.04, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.83; I²=0%; 2 NRSs; 256 participants; low CoE). We are uncertain about the effects of TE on cancer-specific mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.90, 95% CI: 0.11 to 7.28; I²=0%; 2 NRSs; 551 participants; very low CoE) and major adverse events (RR 0.48, 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.79; I²=0%; 10 NRS; 2,360 participants; very low CoE).

CONCLUSIONS

While TE appears to have similar effects on short term postoperative residual renal function, there were uncertainties on mortality and major adverse events. However, we need rigorous RCTs to elucidate the effects of TE as the evidence stems mostly from NRSs.

摘要

目的

评估肿瘤剜除术(TE)与部分肾切除术(PN)治疗 T1 期肾细胞癌的临床疗效和安全性。

材料和方法

根据方案,我们以任何语言检索了多个数据来源,以查找已发表和未发表的随机对照试验和非随机研究(NRS)。我们根据 Cochrane 干预系统评价手册进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,并使用 GRADE 框架对证据确定性(CoE)进行了评级。

结果

我们不确定 TE 对围手术期(平均差值 [MD] 3.38,95%CI 1.52 至 5.23;I²=68%;4 项 NRS;942 名参与者;非常低的 CoE)和长期(MD 2.31,95%CI-1.40 至 6.01;I²=57%;4 项 NRS;542 名参与者;非常低的 CoE)残余肾功能的影响。TE 可能对短期残余肾功能几乎没有影响(MD 1.04,95%CI 0.25 至 1.83;I²=0%;2 项 NRS;256 名参与者;低 CoE)。我们不确定 TE 对癌症特异性死亡率(风险比 [RR] 0.90,95%CI:0.11 至 7.28;I²=0%;2 项 NRS;551 名参与者;非常低的 CoE)和主要不良事件(RR 0.48,95%CI:0.30 至 0.79;I²=0%;10 项 NRS;2360 名参与者;非常低的 CoE)的影响。

结论

虽然 TE 似乎对短期术后残余肾功能有相似的影响,但在死亡率和主要不良事件方面存在不确定性。然而,我们需要严格的 RCT 来阐明 TE 的效果,因为证据主要来自 NRS。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e84/8902429/69a0f8b7f782/icu-63-126-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e84/8902429/47217b8b2176/icu-63-126-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e84/8902429/2d099b4a1e7a/icu-63-126-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e84/8902429/69a0f8b7f782/icu-63-126-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e84/8902429/47217b8b2176/icu-63-126-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e84/8902429/2d099b4a1e7a/icu-63-126-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e84/8902429/69a0f8b7f782/icu-63-126-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Tumor enucleation for the treatment of T1 renal tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.肿瘤剜除术治疗 T1 期肾肿瘤:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Investig Clin Urol. 2022 Mar;63(2):126-139. doi: 10.4111/icu.20210361.
2
Simple tumor enucleation may not decrease oncologic outcomes for T1 renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.单纯肿瘤剜除术可能不会降低T1期肾细胞癌的肿瘤学结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Urol Oncol. 2017 Nov;35(11):661.e15-661.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.07.007. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
3
Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Clinical T1b and T2 Renal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies.部分肾切除术与根治性肾切除术治疗 T1b 和 T2 期临床肾肿瘤的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):606-617. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.060. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
4
Systematic review of perioperative and quality-of-life outcomes following surgical management of localised renal cancer.手术治疗局限性肾癌的围手术期和生活质量结局的系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2012 Dec;62(6):1097-117. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.028. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
5
Off-clamp partial nephrectomy has a positive impact on short- and long-term renal function: a systematic review and meta-analysis.非阻断性部分肾切除术对短期和长期肾功能有积极影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Nephrol. 2018 Jul 31;19(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-0993-3.
6
Tumor Enucleation vs. Partial Nephrectomy for T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.T1期肾细胞癌的肿瘤剜除术与部分肾切除术:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2019 Jun 4;9:473. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00473. eCollection 2019.
7
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies Reporting Perioperative Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy.机器人辅助部分肾切除术与开放性部分肾切除术围手术期结果比较研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Endourol. 2017 Sep;31(9):893-909. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0351. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
8
Systematic review of oncological outcomes following surgical management of localised renal cancer.系统回顾局部肾细胞癌手术治疗后的肿瘤学结果。
Eur Urol. 2012 May;61(5):972-93. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.039. Epub 2012 Feb 25.
9
Comparison of the long-term follow-up and perioperative outcomes of partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy for 4 cm to 7 cm renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.4 cm 至 7 cm 肾细胞癌行部分切除术与根治性切除术的长期随访和围手术期结局比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2019 Jun 7;19(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12894-019-0480-6.
10
Off-clamp versus complete hilar control partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.无夹闭与完全阻断肾门控制肾部分切除术治疗肾细胞癌的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Endourol. 2014 May;28(5):567-76. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0562. Epub 2014 Feb 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Lathyrol affects the expression of AR and PSA and inhibits the malignant behavior of RCC cells.千金子甾醇影响雄激素受体(AR)和前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)的表达,并抑制肾癌细胞的恶性行为。
Open Med (Wars). 2025 Feb 4;20(1):20241136. doi: 10.1515/med-2024-1136. eCollection 2025.
2
Lathyrol reduces the RCC invasion and incidence of EMT via affecting the expression of AR and SPHK2 in RCC mice.千金二萜醇通过影响肾细胞癌(RCC)小鼠中雄激素受体(AR)和鞘氨醇激酶2(SPHK2)的表达,降低RCC的侵袭和上皮-间质转化发生率。
Discov Oncol. 2024 Jul 4;15(1):264. doi: 10.1007/s12672-024-01130-w.
3
How far has robot-assisted partial nephrectomy reached?

本文引用的文献

1
Zero ischemia laparoscopic microwave ablation assisted enucleation laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in clinical T1a renal tumor: a randomized clinical trial.零缺血腹腔镜微波消融辅助剜除术式腹腔镜部分肾切除术治疗临床T1a期肾肿瘤:一项随机临床试验
Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Jan;9(1):194-202. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2019.12.73.
2
The feasibility and safety of modified robot-assisted enucleation for highly complex renal tumors: research on a surgical technique.改良机器人辅助剜除术治疗高度复杂肾肿瘤的可行性及安全性:一种手术技术的研究
Transl Cancer Res. 2019 Jun;8(3):761-769. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2019.04.20.
3
Is 3D laparoscopic off clamp simple enucleation a feasible alternative for clinical T1 renal tumors? Outcomes from a single center experience.
机器人辅助部分肾切除术已经达到了何种程度?
Investig Clin Urol. 2023 Sep;64(5):435-447. doi: 10.4111/icu.20230121.
4
Cytoreductive nephrectomy in the age of immunotherapy-based combination treatment.免疫治疗联合治疗时代的细胞减灭性肾切除术。
Investig Clin Urol. 2023 Sep;64(5):425-434. doi: 10.4111/icu.20230187.
3D 腹腔镜无夹闭单纯剜除术是否可为临床 T1 期肾肿瘤的一种可行选择?单中心经验的结果。
J BUON. 2021 May-Jun;26(3):1088-1093.
4
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Enucleation and Standard Resection in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Completely Endophytic Renal Tumors Through a 1:1 Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.机器人辅助部分肾切除术治疗完全内生性肾肿瘤:1:1 倾向评分匹配分析中剜除术与标准切除术的手术结局比较。
J Endourol. 2021 Dec;35(12):1779-1784. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0213.
5
Trifecta outcomes of modified robot-assisted simple enucleation and standard robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for treating clinical T1b renal cell carcinoma.改良机器人辅助单纯剜除术与标准机器人辅助部分肾切除术治疗临床T1b期肾细胞癌的三联预后
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Mar;10(3):1080-1087. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-1153.
6
3D laparoscopic enucleation vs standard partial nephrectomy for cT1 renal masses: assessment of functional outcomes at 1-year follow-up.3D 腹腔镜肾部分切除术与标准部分肾切除术治疗 cT1 肾肿瘤:1 年随访时的功能结局评估。
Ann Ital Chir. 2020;91:321-326.
7
Tumor Enucleation vs. Partial Nephrectomy for T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.T1期肾细胞癌的肿瘤剜除术与部分肾切除术:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2019 Jun 4;9:473. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00473. eCollection 2019.
8
GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence.GRADE 指南:18. ROBINS-I 及其他评估非随机研究偏倚风险的工具应如何用于评估证据体的确定性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jul;111:105-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
9
Simple tumor enucleation may not decrease oncologic outcomes for T1 renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.单纯肿瘤剜除术可能不会降低T1期肾细胞癌的肿瘤学结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Urol Oncol. 2017 Nov;35(11):661.e15-661.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.07.007. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
10
Functional Comparison of Renal Tumor Enucleation Versus Standard Partial Nephrectomy.肾肿瘤剜除术与标准部分肾切除术的功能比较。
Eur Urol Focus. 2017 Oct;3(4-5):437-443. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Jun 16.