• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

州处方类阿片限制法出台后,按提供者类型划分的处方变化。

Changes in Prescribing by Provider Type Following a State Prescription Opioid Restriction Law.

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Jun;37(8):1838-1844. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06966-4. Epub 2021 Jul 8.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-021-06966-4
PMID:34236602
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9198141/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many states have implemented opioid days' supply restriction policies, leading to reductions in opioid prescribing. Although research within certain provider types exist, no study has evaluated a restriction policy by various provider types.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate changes in opioid utilization following a days' supply restriction policy stratified by provider type: surgery, emergency medicine, primary care, specialty care, and dentistry.

DESIGN

Interrupted time series (ITS) PARTICIPANTS: Opioid prescription claims of patients in a private health plan serving a large Florida employer from 1/1/2015 to 3/31/2019. Provider types were determined using the Healthcare Provider Taxonomy Code associated with the national provider identifier (NPI).

INTERVENTIONS

Florida's opioid restriction policy implemented on July 1, 2018.

MAIN MEASURES

Changes in mean morphine milligram equivalent (MMEs), mean days' supply, and mean number of units dispensed per opioid prescription before and after policy implementation.

KEY RESULTS

There were 10,583 opioid initial prescriptions dispensed. Treating providers were classified as surgery (16.4%; n = 1732), emergency care (14.3%; n = 1516), primary care (21.2%; n = 2241), specialty care (11.4%; n = 1207), and dentistry providers (23.7%; n = 2511). Significant reductions in mean days' supply were observed across most provider types ranging from 14% reduction for dentistry providers to 41% reduction for specialty care providers. Significant changes were observed for emergency care and specialty care providers with a 30% (p = 0.001)and 29% (p < 0.001) reduction in mean MME, respectively, and a 27% (p = 0.040) reduction in mean number of units dispensed in emergency care providers, after implementation. Pre-implementation trends in opioid prescribing varied by provider type impacting the effects of the opioid days' supply restriction policy.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-policy opioid prescribing varied by provider type with a differential impact on mean MMEs, mean days' supply, and mean number of units dispensed per prescription following implementation.

摘要

背景

许多州都实施了阿片类药物供应天数限制政策,导致阿片类药物的处方量减少。尽管某些类型的提供者已经开展了相关研究,但尚无研究评估按提供者类型(外科、急诊医学、初级保健、专科保健和牙科)实施限制政策的效果。

目的

评估按提供者类型(外科、急诊医学、初级保健、专科保健和牙科)分层的阿片类药物使用量在实施供应天数限制政策后的变化。

设计

中断时间序列(ITS)

参与者

2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 3 月 31 日期间,在一家为佛罗里达州大型雇主提供服务的私人健康计划中就诊的患者的阿片类药物处方。使用与国家提供者标识符(NPI)相关联的医疗保健提供者分类代码确定提供者类型。

干预措施

佛罗里达州的阿片类药物限制政策于 2018 年 7 月 1 日实施。

主要观察指标

政策实施前后平均吗啡毫克当量(MME)、平均供应天数和每张阿片类药物处方平均配药单位数的变化。

结果

共开出 10583 张初始阿片类药物处方。治疗提供者被分为外科(16.4%,n=1732)、急诊(14.3%,n=1516)、初级保健(21.2%,n=2241)、专科保健(11.4%,n=1207)和牙科(23.7%,n=2511)。大多数提供者类型的平均供应天数都有显著减少,从牙科提供者减少 14%到专科保健提供者减少 41%不等。急诊和专科保健提供者发生了显著变化,其平均 MME 分别减少了 30%(p=0.001)和 29%(p<0.001),急诊保健提供者平均配药单位数减少了 27%(p=0.040)。实施后,急诊保健提供者的阿片类药物处方开具量呈下降趋势。实施阿片类药物供应天数限制政策之前,各提供者类型的阿片类药物处方开具情况存在差异,这对政策的效果产生了影响。

结论

在实施阿片类药物供应天数限制政策之前,各提供者类型的阿片类药物处方开具情况存在差异,实施后对平均 MME、平均供应天数和每张处方平均配药单位数的影响也存在差异。

相似文献

1
Changes in Prescribing by Provider Type Following a State Prescription Opioid Restriction Law.州处方类阿片限制法出台后,按提供者类型划分的处方变化。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Jun;37(8):1838-1844. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06966-4. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
2
Changes in Quantity of Opioids Dispensed following Florida's Restriction Law for Acute Pain Prescriptions.佛罗里达州限制急性疼痛处方后,阿片类药物配给量的变化。
Pain Med. 2021 Aug 6;22(8):1870-1876. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab017.
3
Effect of Florida's Prescription Drug Monitoring Program and Pill Mill Laws on Opioid Prescribing and Use.佛罗里达州的处方药监测计划和“药丸工厂”法对阿片类药物处方和使用的影响。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Oct;175(10):1642-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.3931.
4
Changes in Schedule II oral opioid volume dispensed in a private health plan following Florida's Acute Pain Opioid Restriction Law.佛罗里达州急性疼痛阿片类药物限制法实施后,私人健康计划中附表 II 口服阿片类药物用量的变化。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Jun;27(6):779-784. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.6.779.
5
Trends in Use of Prescription Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Medications Before vs After Implementation of a Florida Law Restricting Opioid Prescribing for Acute Pain.佛罗里达州限制阿片类药物治疗急性疼痛的法规实施前后处方非甾体抗炎药使用趋势
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2113383. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13383.
6
Chronic Opioid Therapy Utilization Following an Acute Pain Prescription Supply Restriction Law: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.慢性阿片类药物治疗在急性疼痛处方供应限制法后的利用:一项中断时间序列分析。
Pain Physician. 2021 Sep;24(6):417-424.
7
Association of a State Prescribing Limits Policy with Opioid Prescribing and Long-term Use: an Interrupted Time Series Analysis.州处方限制政策与阿片类药物处方和长期使用的关联:一项中断时间序列分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Jun;38(8):1862-1870. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07991-7. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
8
Assessment of Postoperative Opioid Prescriptions Before and After Implementation of a Mandatory Prescription Drug Monitoring Program.评估实施强制性处方药物监测计划前后的术后阿片类药物处方。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Oct 1;2(10):e212924. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.2924. eCollection 2021 Oct.
9
The effects of state rules on opioid prescribing in Indiana.印第安纳州的州法规对阿片类药物处方的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jan 18;18(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2830-6.
10
Association Between State Opioid Prescribing Cap Laws and Receipt of Opioid Prescriptions Among Children and Adolescents.州级阿片类药物处方配给法规与儿童和青少年获得阿片类药物处方之间的关联。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Aug 5;3(8):e222461. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.2461. eCollection 2022 Aug.

引用本文的文献

1
An updated view on the influence of initial opioid prescription characteristics on long-term opioid use among opioid naïve patients.更新视角:初诊阿片类药物特征对阿片类药物初治患者长期使用阿片类药物的影响。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2024 Dec 1;265:112463. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.112463. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
2
Association of a State Prescribing Limits Policy with Opioid Prescribing and Long-term Use: an Interrupted Time Series Analysis.州处方限制政策与阿片类药物处方和长期使用的关联:一项中断时间序列分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Jun;38(8):1862-1870. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07991-7. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
3
Effects of state opioid prescribing cap laws on opioid prescribing after surgery.州级阿片类药物处方限额法对术后阿片类药物处方的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct;57(5):1154-1164. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14023. Epub 2022 Jul 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Opioid days' supply limits: an interrupted time-series analysis of opioid prescribing before and following a Massachusetts law.阿片类药物日供应量限制:马萨诸塞州法律颁布前后阿片类药物处方的中断时间序列分析。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2021 May 4;47(3):350-359. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2020.1853140. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
2
Effects of hydrocodone rescheduling on opioid use outcomes: A systematic review.将氢可酮重新分类对阿片类药物使用结果的影响:系统评价。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2021 Mar-Apr;61(2):e20-e44. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2020.09.013. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
3
Association Between In-Clinic Opioid Administration and Discharge Opioid Prescription in Urgent Care: a Retrospective Cohort Study.在急诊就诊时给予阿片类药物与出院时开具阿片类药物处方之间的关联:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jan;36(1):43-50. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06059-8. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
4
An Effective Intervention: Limiting Opioid Prescribing as a Means of Reducing Opioid Analgesic Misuse, and Overdose Deaths.一项有效的干预措施:限制阿片类药物的开具,以减少阿片类镇痛药的滥用和过量死亡。
J Law Med Ethics. 2020 Jun;48(2):249-258. doi: 10.1177/1073110520935336.
5
Changes in Opioid Use After Florida's Restriction Law for Acute Pain Prescriptions.佛罗里达州限制急性疼痛处方阿片类药物使用后阿片类药物使用的变化。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Feb 5;3(2):e200234. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0234.
6
Overprescribing of Opioids to Adults by Dentists in the U.S., 2011-2015.美国牙医 2011-2015 年给成年人开出的阿片类药物处方过多。
Am J Prev Med. 2020 Apr;58(4):473-486. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.11.006. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
7
Association of State Opioid Duration Limits With Postoperative Opioid Prescribing.州级阿片类药物持续时间限制与术后阿片类药物处方的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1918361. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18361.
8
Association of Florida House Bill 21 With Postoperative Opioid Prescribing for Acute Pain at a Single Institution.佛罗里达州众议院法案 21 号与单一医疗机构急性疼痛术后阿片类药物处方的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Mar 1;155(3):263-264. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4913.
9
Opioid prescribing rates from the emergency department: Down but not out.急诊室开出的阿片类药物处方率:有所下降,但并未绝迹。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Dec 1;205:107636. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107636. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
10
How Should a Physician Respond to a Patient's Pain When New Opioid Prescribing Laws Limit Shared Decision Making?
AMA J Ethics. 2019 Oct 1;21(10):E838-843. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.838.