Department of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021 Jul 2;16:1977-1988. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S304976. eCollection 2021.
This Stay Active after Rehabilitation (STAR) study examined the effects of a pedometer-based behavioral intervention for individuals with COPD during three weeks of inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on patients' physical activity levels six weeks and six months after PR, including steps (primary outcome), moderate-intensity physical activity, and sedentary time as well as patient quality of life, symptoms, and other psychological and clinical variables.
Rehabilitation patients with COPD wore a triaxial accelerometer (ActiGraph wGT3X) for seven days two weeks before (T0) as well as six weeks (T3) and six months (T4) after PR. In addition to the three-week inpatient PR (control group, CG), the randomly allocated intervention group (IG) received a brief pedometer-based behavioral intervention with the application of the following behavior-change techniques: performing the behavior, individual goal-setting, self-monitoring, and feedback. The effects were analyzed using analysis of covariance with an intention-to-treat approach.
A total of 327 patients (69% male, age: 58 years, FEV (%): 53.5, six-minute walk distance: 447.8 m) were randomly allocated to either the IG (n = 167) or CG (n = 160). Although both groups increased their daily steps after PR (IG: M = 1152, CG: M = 745; IG: M = 795, CG: M = 300), the slightly higher increases in daily steps in the IG compared to the CG at T3 (Δ388 steps, = 0.16) and T4 (Δ458 steps, = 0.15) were not statistically significant (p > 0.05 for all). Patients in both groups showed moderate to high pre-post-changes in terms of secondary outcomes, but no advantage favoring the IG was found.
The results show that adding a pedometer-based behavioral intervention to standard German three-week inpatient PR for COPD patients did not result in more physical activity in terms of steps and moderate-intensity physical activity or less sedentary time. However, both groups (IG and CG) showed remarkably enhanced physical activity levels six weeks and six months after PR, as well as improvements in other secondary outcomes (eg, quality of life).
这项康复后保持活跃(STAR)研究考察了基于计步器的行为干预对住院肺康复(PR)期间 COPD 患者的影响,该干预措施在 PR 后三周、六周和六个月时对患者的身体活动水平(主要结局,包括步数)、中等强度体力活动和久坐时间以及患者生活质量、症状和其他心理及临床变量的影响。
接受 PR 的 COPD 患者在 PR 前两周(T0)和 PR 后六周(T3)及六个月(T4)佩戴三轴加速度计(ActiGraph wGT3X)连续七天。除了为期三周的住院 PR(对照组,CG)外,随机分配的干预组(IG)还接受了基于计步器的简短行为干预,应用了以下行为改变技术:实施行为、个人目标设定、自我监测和反馈。采用意向治疗分析的协方差分析来分析效果。
共有 327 名患者(69%为男性,年龄:58 岁,FEV(%):53.5,6 分钟步行距离:447.8m)被随机分配到 IG(n=167)或 CG(n=160)。尽管两组患者在 PR 后每天的步数都有所增加(IG:M=1152,CG:M=745;IG:M=795,CG:M=300),但 IG 组在 T3(增加 388 步, = 0.16)和 T4(增加 458 步, = 0.15)时的增加幅度略高于 CG 组,但差异无统计学意义(所有 p > 0.05)。两组患者在次要结局方面都表现出了从中度到高度的治疗前后变化,但未发现 IG 组有优势。
结果表明,在德国标准的为期三周的住院 PR 中为 COPD 患者添加基于计步器的行为干预并未在步数、中等强度体力活动或久坐时间方面带来更多的身体活动。然而,两组(IG 和 CG)在 PR 后六周和六个月时都显著提高了身体活动水平,其他次要结局(如生活质量)也得到了改善。