Singhal Sorabh, Kloosterman Casey, Billian Joseph, Bailey Teresa, Soares Neelkamal
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2021;26(5):460-466. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-26.5.460. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
Second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) prescription use has become increasingly prevalent in the pediatric population, despite metabolic adverse effects. A significant number of SGA medications are prescribed for indications that are not approved by the FDA. This study aimed to quantify clinician adherence to the FDA and professional society indication, age, and dosing guidelines when prescribing SGA medications for pediatric patients.
We used electronic health record data from 3 health care systems. We analyzed outpatient encounters where a pediatric patient was prescribed an SGA during an 18-month time frame. Clinician prescribing patterns were compared to a therapeutic regimen table created using professional society guidelines and FDA medication labels.
Most of the encounters listed an indication that was not documented as a recommended use (84.3%). Most prescriptions aligned with the generalized dose guidelines (93.8%) and age guidelines (94.9%). Clinicians were more likely to follow indication guidelines when prescribing risperidone, the highest adherence medication, compared with quetiapine, the lowest adherence medication (odds ratio [OR], 2.5; 95% CI, 1.1-6.0). Compared with prescriptions for younger children, clinicians were more likely to follow indication guidelines for children aged 13 to 15 years (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.1-7.2) and 16 to 18 years (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.2-8.1).
Community clinicians overall demonstrated a low level of adherence to indication guidelines when prescribing SGA medications to pediatric populations, while maintaining higher adherence to age and dosing guidelines. Older children were more likely to receive an SGA prescription for recommended indications compared with younger children.
尽管存在代谢不良反应,但第二代抗精神病药物(SGA)在儿科人群中的处方使用已变得越来越普遍。大量SGA药物的处方用于未经美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的适应症。本研究旨在量化临床医生在为儿科患者开具SGA药物时对FDA和专业协会的适应症、年龄及给药指南的遵循情况。
我们使用了来自3个医疗系统的电子健康记录数据。我们分析了在18个月时间范围内儿科患者被开具SGA药物的门诊就诊情况。将临床医生的处方模式与根据专业协会指南和FDA药物标签创建的治疗方案表进行比较。
大多数就诊记录的适应症未被记录为推荐用途(84.3%)。大多数处方符合一般剂量指南(93.8%)和年龄指南(94.9%)。与喹硫平(遵循率最低的药物)相比,临床医生在开具利培酮(遵循率最高的药物)时更有可能遵循适应症指南(优势比[OR],2.5;95%置信区间[CI],1.1 - 6.0)。与年幼儿童的处方相比,临床医生更有可能遵循13至15岁儿童(OR,2.8;95% CI,1.1 - 7.2)和16至18岁儿童(OR,3.1;95% CI,1.2 - 8.1)的适应症指南。
社区临床医生在为儿科人群开具SGA药物时总体上对适应症指南的遵循程度较低,而对年龄和给药指南的遵循程度较高。与年幼儿童相比,年龄较大的儿童更有可能因推荐适应症而接受SGA处方。