Kwee Sandi A, Wong Linda L, Sato Miles M, Acoba Jared D, Rho Young Soo, Srivastava Avantika, Landsittel Douglas P
Queen's Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii; Clinical and Translational Science Section, Cancer Biology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii.
Clinical and Translational Science Section, Cancer Biology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2021 Sep;32(9):1258-1266.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2021.07.001. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
To examine National Cancer Database (NCDB) data to comparatively evaluate overall survival (OS) between patients undergoing transarterial radioembolization (TARE) and those undergoing systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with major vascular invasion (HCC-MVI).
One thousand five hundred fourteen patients with HCC-MVI undergoing first-line TARE or systemic therapy were identified from the NCDB. OS was compared using propensity score-matched Cox regression and landmark analysis. Efficacy was also compared within a target trial framework.
TARE usage doubled between 2010 and 2015. Intervals before treatment were longer for TARE than for systemic therapy (mean [median], 66.5 [60] days vs 46.8 (35) days, respectively, P < .0001). In propensity-score-matched and landmark-time-adjusted analyses, TARE was found to be associated with a hazard ratio of 0.74 (95 % CI, 0.60-0.91; P = .005) and median OS of 7.1 months (95 % CI, 5.0-10.5) versus 4.9 months (95 % CI, 3.9-6.5) for systemically treated patients. In an emulated target trial involving 236 patients with unilobular HCC-MVI, a low number of comorbidities, creatinine levels <2.0 mg/dL, bilirubin levels <2.0 mg/dL, and international normalized ratio <1.7, TARE was found to be associated with a hazard ratio of 0.57 (95 % CI, 0.39-0.83; P = .004) and a median OS of 12.9 months (95 % CI, 7.6-19.2) versus 6.5 months (95 % CI, 3.6-11.1) for the systemic therapy arm.
In propensity-score-matched analyses involving pragmatic and target trial HCC-MVI cohorts, TARE was found to be associated with significant survival benefits compared with systemic therapy. Although not a substitute for prospective trials, these findings suggest that the increasing use of TARE for HCC-MVI is accompanied by improved OS. Further trials of TARE in patients with HCC-MVI are needed, especially to compare with newer systemic therapies.
研究国家癌症数据库(NCDB)数据,以比较评估经动脉放射性栓塞术(TARE)治疗与接受全身治疗的伴有大血管侵犯的肝细胞癌(HCC-MVI)患者的总生存期(OS)。
从NCDB中确定1514例接受一线TARE或全身治疗的HCC-MVI患者。使用倾向评分匹配的Cox回归和标志性分析比较OS。还在目标试验框架内比较疗效。
2010年至2015年期间TARE的使用量增加了一倍。TARE治疗前的间隔时间比全身治疗更长(平均[中位数]分别为66.5[60]天和46.8[35]天,P<.0001)。在倾向评分匹配和标志性时间调整分析中,发现TARE与风险比0.74相关(95%CI,0.60-0.91;P=.005),全身治疗患者的中位OS为7.1个月(95%CI,5.0-10.5),而全身治疗患者为4.9个月(95%CI,3.9-6.5)。在一项涉及236例单叶HCC-MVI患者、合并症数量少、肌酐水平<2.0mg/dL、胆红素水平<2.0mg/dL和国际标准化比值<1.7的模拟目标试验中,发现TARE与风险比0.57相关(95%CI,0.39-0.83;P=.004),全身治疗组的中位OS为12.9个月(95%CI,7.6-19.2),而全身治疗组为6.5个月(95%CI,3.6-11.1)。
在涉及实用和目标试验HCC-MVI队列的倾向评分匹配分析中,发现与全身治疗相比,TARE具有显著的生存获益。尽管不能替代前瞻性试验,但这些发现表明,HCC-MVI患者TARE使用的增加伴随着OS的改善。需要对HCC-MVI患者进行进一步的TARE试验,尤其是与更新的全身治疗进行比较。