文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

选择性龋去净术(SCRiPT)治疗恒牙深龋:基层医疗的一项随机对照临床试验。

Selective Caries Removal in Permanent Teeth (SCRiPT) for the treatment of deep carious lesions: a randomised controlled clinical trial in primary care.

机构信息

Dental Health Services Research Unit, Dundee Dental School, The University of Dundee, 9th Floor, Park Place, Dundee, DD1 4HN, UK.

NHS Education for Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2021 Jul 9;21(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01637-6.


DOI:10.1186/s12903-021-01637-6
PMID:34243733
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8267238/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dental caries is one of the most prevalent non-communicable disease globally and can have serious health sequelae impacting negatively on quality of life. In the UK most adults experience dental caries during their lifetime and the 2009 Adult Dental Health Survey reported that 85% of adults have at least one dental restoration. Conservative removal of tooth tissue for both primary and secondary caries reduces the risk of failure due to tooth-restoration, complex fracture as well as remaining tooth surfaces being less vulnerable to further caries. However, despite its prevalence there is no consensus on how much caries to remove prior to placing a restoration to achieve optimal outcomes. Evidence for selective compared to complete or near-complete caries removal suggests there may be benefits for selective removal in sustaining tooth vitality, therefore avoiding abscess formation and pain, so eliminating the need for more complex and costly treatment or eventual tooth loss. However, the evidence is of low scientific quality and mainly gleaned from studies in primary teeth. METHOD: This is a pragmatic, multi-centre, two-arm patient randomised controlled clinical trial including an internal pilot set in primary dental care in Scotland and England. Dental health professionals will recruit 623 participants over 12-years of age with deep carious lesions in their permanent posterior teeth. Participants will have a single tooth randomised to either the selective caries removal or complete caries removal treatment arm. Baseline measures and outcome data (during the 3-year follow-up period) will be assessed through clinical examination, patient questionnaires and NHS databases. A mixed-method process evaluation will complement the clinical and economic outcome evaluation and examine implementation, mechanisms of impact and context. The primary outcome at three years is sustained tooth vitality. The primary economic outcome is net benefit modelled over a lifetime horizon. Clinical secondary outcomes include pulp exposure, progession of caries, restoration failure; as well as patient-centred and economic outcomes. DISCUSSION: SCRiPT will provide evidence for the most clinically effective and cost-beneficial approach to managing deep carious lesions in permanent posterior teeth in primary care. This will support general dental practitioners, patients and policy makers in decision making. Trial Registration Trial registry: ISRCTN. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN76503940. Date of Registration: 30.10.2019. URL of trial registry record: https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN76503940?q=ISRCTN76503940%20&filters=&sort=&offset=1&totalResults=1&page=1&pageSize=10&searchType=basic-search .

摘要

背景:龋齿是全球最普遍的非传染性疾病之一,可对生活质量产生严重的健康后果。在英国,大多数成年人一生中都会经历龋齿,2009 年的《成人牙科健康调查》报告称,85%的成年人至少有一项牙齿修复。对于原发性和继发性龋齿,保守地去除牙齿组织可以降低因牙修复、复杂骨折以及剩余牙面更容易受到进一步龋齿影响而导致的失败风险。然而,尽管龋齿很普遍,但对于放置修复体之前去除多少龋齿以获得最佳效果,尚无共识。与完全或接近完全去除龋齿相比,选择性去除龋齿的证据表明,选择性去除龋齿可能有助于维持牙齿活力,从而避免脓肿形成和疼痛,从而避免更复杂和昂贵的治疗或最终牙齿缺失。然而,证据的科学质量较低,主要来自于初级牙齿的研究。

方法:这是一项在苏格兰和英格兰初级牙科护理中进行的实用、多中心、双臂患者随机对照临床试验,包括内部试点。牙科保健专业人员将在 12 年内招募 623 名患有深龋病变的恒牙后牙患者。参与者将随机分配到选择性龋齿去除或完全龋齿去除治疗组中的单个牙齿。基线测量和结果数据(在 3 年随访期间)将通过临床检查、患者问卷和 NHS 数据库进行评估。混合方法的过程评估将补充临床和经济结果评估,并检查实施、影响机制和背景。三年的主要结果是维持牙齿活力。主要的经济结果是终身模型的净效益。临床次要结果包括牙髓暴露、龋齿进展、修复失败;以及以患者为中心和经济结果。

讨论:SCRiPT 将为管理初级保健中恒牙深龋病变最具临床效果和成本效益的方法提供证据。这将支持普通牙科医生、患者和决策者做出决策。试验注册 试验登记处:ISRCTN。

试验注册编号:ISRCTN76503940。登记日期:2019 年 10 月 30 日。试验登记网址记录:https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN76503940?q=ISRCTN76503940%20&filters=&sort=&offset=1&totalResults=1&page=1&pageSize=10&searchType=basic-search。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cf1/8268549/c9f245ccea5d/12903_2021_1637_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cf1/8268549/c9f245ccea5d/12903_2021_1637_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cf1/8268549/c9f245ccea5d/12903_2021_1637_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Selective Caries Removal in Permanent Teeth (SCRiPT) for the treatment of deep carious lesions: a randomised controlled clinical trial in primary care.

BMC Oral Health. 2021-7-9

[2]
Best-practice prevention alone or with conventional or biological caries management for 3- to 7-year-olds: the FiCTION three-arm RCT.

Health Technol Assess. 2020-1

[3]
Dentists' perspectives on selective caries removal for the management of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth.

BMC Oral Health. 2025-3-9

[4]
The FiCTION dental trial protocol - filling children's teeth: indicated or not?

BMC Oral Health. 2013-6-1

[5]
Operative caries management in adults and children.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013-3-28

[6]
Interventions for treating cavitated or dentine carious lesions.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-7-19

[7]
Atraumatic restorative treatment versus conventional restorative treatment for managing dental caries.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-28

[8]
One-step partial or complete caries removal and bonding with antibacterial or traditional self-etch adhesives: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Trials. 2016-8-15

[9]
Behaviour change intervention (education and text) to prevent dental caries in secondary school pupils: BRIGHT RCT, process and economic evaluation.

Health Technol Assess. 2024-9

[10]
WITHDRAWN: Operative caries management in adults and children.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019-7-24

引用本文的文献

[1]
Vital pulp therapies in permanent teeth: what, when, where, who, why and how?

Br Dent J. 2025-4

[2]
Dentists' perspectives on selective caries removal for the management of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth.

BMC Oral Health. 2025-3-9

[3]
Direct Composite Restorations on Permanent Teeth in the Anterior and Posterior Region - An Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline - Part 2: Recommendations for Composite Processing.

J Adhes Dent. 2024-9-17

[4]
Comparative Meta-Analysis of Minimally Invasive and Conventional Approaches for Caries Removal in Permanent Dentition.

Medicina (Kaunas). 2024-2-27

[5]
Does the liner material influence pulpal vitality in deep carious cavities submitted to selective caries removal? A network meta-analysis review.

Clin Oral Investig. 2023-12

[6]
Deep Carious Lesions Management with Stepwise, Selective, or Non-Selective Removal in Permanent Dentition: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Healthcare (Basel). 2023-8-18

[7]
The revolutionary evolution in carious lesion management.

J Conserv Dent. 2023

[8]
Minimally invasive selective caries removal: a clinical guide.

Br Dent J. 2023-2

[9]
Selective versus stepwise removal of deep carious lesions: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

J Dent Sci. 2023-1

[10]
Dental Caries and Its Management.

Int J Dent. 2023-1-3

本文引用的文献

[1]
Minimum intervention oral healthcare delivery - is there consensus?

Br Dent J. 2020-10

[2]
Three behavior change theory-informed randomized studies within a trial to improve response rates to trial postal questionnaires.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2020-6

[3]
To fill or not to fill: a qualitative cross-country study on dentists' decisions in managing non-cavitated proximal caries lesions.

Implement Sci. 2018-4-6

[4]
Randomized Clinical Trials on Deep Carious Lesions: 5-Year Follow-up.

J Dent Res. 2017-7

[5]
One-step partial or complete caries removal and bonding with antibacterial or traditional self-etch adhesives: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Trials. 2016-8-15

[6]
Managing Carious Lesions: Consensus Recommendations on Carious Tissue Removal.

Adv Dent Res. 2016-5

[7]
Managing Carious Lesions: Consensus Recommendations on Terminology.

Adv Dent Res. 2016-5

[8]
Barriers and facilitators of evidence-based management of patients with bacterial infections among general dental practitioners: a theory-informed interview study.

Implement Sci. 2016-1-29

[9]
How Many Subjects Does It Take To Do A Regression Analysis.

Multivariate Behav Res. 1991-7-1

[10]
Clinician trialist rounds: 28. When RCT participants are lost to follow-up. Part 1: Why even a few can matter.

Clin Trials. 2015-10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索