• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Minimum intervention oral healthcare delivery - is there consensus?

作者信息

Banerjee Avijit

机构信息

Guest Editor BDJ Minimum Intervention Themed Issue and Professor of Cariology & Operative Dentistry; Hon. Consultant, Restorative Dentistry; Head of Department, Conservative & MI Dentistry; Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, Guy's Dental Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, UK.

出版信息

Br Dent J. 2020 Oct;229(7):393-395. doi: 10.1038/s41415-020-2235-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41415-020-2235-x
PMID:33037331
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7546164/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68b5/7546164/6b675eb5b077/41415_2020_2235_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68b5/7546164/40797f740334/41415_2020_2235_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68b5/7546164/6b675eb5b077/41415_2020_2235_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68b5/7546164/40797f740334/41415_2020_2235_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68b5/7546164/6b675eb5b077/41415_2020_2235_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Minimum intervention oral healthcare delivery - is there consensus?最小干预口腔医疗服务——是否存在共识？
Br Dent J. 2020 Oct;229(7):393-395. doi: 10.1038/s41415-020-2235-x.
2
Prioritising models of healthcare service delivery for a more sustainable health system: a Delphi study of Australian health policy, clinical practice and management, academic and consumer stakeholders.优先考虑医疗服务提供模式，以建立更具可持续性的卫生系统：对澳大利亚卫生政策、临床实践和管理、学术和消费者利益相关者的德尔菲研究。
Aust Health Rev. 2021 Aug;45(4):425-432. doi: 10.1071/AH20160.
3
Development of a European consensus from dentists, dental hygienists and physicians on a standard for oral health care in care-dependent older people: An e-Delphi study.制定依赖护理的老年人口腔保健标准的欧洲共识：来自牙医、口腔卫生学家和医生的电子德尔菲研究。
Gerodontology. 2021 Mar;38(1):41-56. doi: 10.1111/ger.12501. Epub 2020 Oct 18.
4
Clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements for antenatal oral healthcare: An assessment of their methodological quality and content of recommendations.临床实践指南和共识声明用于产前口腔保健：对其方法学质量和推荐内容的评估。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 3;17(2):e0263444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263444. eCollection 2022.
5
Feasibility of minimum intervention oral healthcare delivery for individuals with dental phobia.针对恐医症患者的最低侵入性口腔保健服务的可行性。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jul 31;23(1):531. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03095-8.
6
'MI' reflections on a pandemic-governed 2020.对 2020 年大流行治理之年的反思
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2020 Feb 14;18(1):1-2. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.b871931.
7
A major new alliance in Australian healthcare: the Australian consensus framework for ethical collaboration in the healthcare sector.澳大利亚医疗保健领域的一项重大新联盟：澳大利亚医疗保健部门伦理合作共识框架。
Intern Med J. 2020 Jun;50(6):679-684. doi: 10.1111/imj.14861.
8
Minimum intervention oral healthcare for people with dental phobia: a patient management pathway.针对恐医症患者的最低限度介入口腔保健：患者管理路径。
Br Dent J. 2020 Oct;229(7):417-424. doi: 10.1038/s41415-020-2178-2. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
9
Overhaul this 'broken system". Consensus gels within the industry's elite that U.S. healthcare needs to be reorganized from top to bottom.
Mod Healthc. 2008 Apr 21;38(16):24-5.
10
Reinforcing the humanity in healthcare: The Glasgow Consensus Statement on effective communication in clinical encounters.强化医疗保健中的人文关怀：格拉斯哥临床医患沟通共识声明
Patient Educ Couns. 2024 May;122:108158. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108158. Epub 2024 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Consequences of hyposalivation in relation to cancer treatment and early management of radiation-induced caries: case reports.口干症与癌症治疗的关系及其导致的放射性龋齿的早期管理后果：病例报告。
Br Dent J. 2024 Nov;237(9):705-709. doi: 10.1038/s41415-024-7894-6. Epub 2024 Nov 8.
2
Minimum intervention oral care: staging and grading dental carious lesions in clinical practice.最低限度干预口腔护理：临床实践中评估和分级龋齿病变。
Br Dent J. 2024 Sep;237(6):457-463. doi: 10.1038/s41415-024-7843-4. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
3
Could the minimum intervention oral care framework help improve the quality of oral health delivery and access to NHS primary dental care?

本文引用的文献

1
How to Intervene in the Caries Process in Older Adults: A Joint ORCA and EFCD Expert Delphi Consensus Statement.如何干预老年人的龋病进程：ORCA与EFCD联合专家德尔菲共识声明
Caries Res. 2020 Dec 8;54(5-6):1-7. doi: 10.1159/000510843.
2
How to intervene in the caries process in adults: proximal and secondary caries? An EFCD-ORCA-DGZ expert Delphi consensus statement.如何干预成年人的龋齿进程：邻面龋和继发龋？EFCD-ORCA-DGZ 专家德尔菲共识声明。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Sep;24(9):3315-3321. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03431-0. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
3
How to Intervene in the Caries Process in Children: A Joint ORCA and EFCD Expert Delphi Consensus Statement.
最低干预口腔护理框架能否有助于提高口腔健康服务质量和获得国民保健制度初级牙科护理？
Br Dent J. 2024 Sep;237(6):495-499. doi: 10.1038/s41415-024-7627-x. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
4
Organization for Caries Research-European Federation of Conservative Dentistry Consensus Report on Clinical Recommendations for Caries Diagnosis Paper II: Caries Lesion Activity and Progression Assessment.龋病研究组织-欧洲牙髓病学会共识报告关于龋病诊断临床推荐意见的第二部分：龋损活动性和进展评估。
Caries Res. 2024;58(5):511-520. doi: 10.1159/000538619. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
5
Minimum intervention oral care - incentivising preventive management of high-needs/high caries-risk patients using phased courses of treatment.最低限度干预口腔护理 - 通过分阶段治疗课程激励高需求/高龋齿风险患者进行预防性管理。
Br Dent J. 2024 Mar;236(5):379-382. doi: 10.1038/s41415-024-7132-2. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
6
Perception of Minimum Interventional Dentistry among Dental Undergraduate Students and Interns.口腔医学本科生和实习生对最小介入牙科的认知。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Mar 24;59(4):649. doi: 10.3390/medicina59040649.
7
Reframing perceptions in operative dentistry relating evidence-based dentistry and clinical decision making: a cross-sectional study among Jordanian dentists.重新构建与循证牙科和临床决策相关的口腔手术中认知：约旦牙医的横断面研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Dec 24;22(1):637. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02641-0.
8
Reframing Perceptions in Restorative Dentistry: Evidence-Based Dentistry and Clinical Decision-Making.重塑口腔修复学认知：循证牙科与临床决策
Int J Dent. 2021 Dec 31;2021:4871385. doi: 10.1155/2021/4871385. eCollection 2021.
9
Management of compromised first permanent molars in a cohort of UK paediatric patients referred to hospital-based services.英国儿科患者转诊至医院服务的队列中，第一恒磨牙功能受损的处理。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2022 Sep;32(5):724-736. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12951. Epub 2022 Apr 15.
10
New UK Chapter of the Alliance for a Cavity-Free Future.英国无龋未来联盟新分会成立。
Br Dent J. 2021 Dec;231(12):781-786. doi: 10.1038/s41415-021-3730-4. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
如何干预儿童龋齿进程：ORCA 和 EFCD 联合专家德尔菲共识声明。
Caries Res. 2020;54(4):297-305. doi: 10.1159/000507692. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
4
Why re-invent the wheel if you've run out of road?如果已经无路可走，为何还要另辟蹊径？
Br Dent J. 2020 May;228(10):755-756. doi: 10.1038/s41415-020-1646-z.
5
How to intervene in the caries process: proximal caries in adolescents and adults-a systematic review and meta-analysis.如何干预龋齿进程：青少年和成年人的邻面龋——一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 May;24(5):1623-1636. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03201-y. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
6
Secondary caries: what is it, and how it can be controlled, detected, and managed?继发龋：它是什么，以及如何控制、检测和管理它？
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 May;24(5):1869-1876. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03268-7. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
7
A curriculum for behaviour and oral healthcare management for dentally anxious children-Recommendations from the Children Experiencing Dental Anxiety: Collaboration on Research and Education (CEDACORE).牙科焦虑儿童行为和口腔保健管理课程-来自儿童经历牙科焦虑：协作研究和教育（CEDACORE）的建议。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2020 Sep;30(5):556-569. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12635. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
8
Restorative intervention thresholds and treatment decisions of general dental practitioners in London.伦敦普通牙医的修复干预阈值和治疗决策。
Br Dent J. 2019 Oct;227(8):727-732. doi: 10.1038/s41415-019-0849-7.
9
Terminology of Dental Caries and Dental Caries Management: Consensus Report of a Workshop Organized by ORCA and Cariology Research Group of IADR.龋病和龋病管理术语：由 ORCA 和 IADR 龋病研究组组织的研讨会的共识报告。
Caries Res. 2020;54(1):7-14. doi: 10.1159/000503309. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
10
CariesCare practice guide: consensus on evidence into practice.龋病防治实践指南：循证至实践共识。
Br Dent J. 2019 Sep;227(5):353-362. doi: 10.1038/s41415-019-0678-8.