Suppr超能文献

牛羊在耕作景观中对花卉资源和本地蜜蜂群落产生不同的影响。

Cattle and sheep differentially alter floral resources and the native bee communities in working landscapes.

机构信息

School of Natural Resource Sciences-Range Science Program, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota, 58108, USA.

Hettinger Research Extension Center, North Dakota State University, Hettinger, North Dakota, 58639, USA.

出版信息

Ecol Appl. 2021 Oct;31(7):e02406. doi: 10.1002/eap.2406. Epub 2021 Aug 18.

Abstract

Within agricultural landscapes, native bees often rely on limited natural and seminatural lands to provide the majority of the food and nesting resources that sustain them. To understand better how management can affect pollinators in these seminatural areas, we compared how sheep or cattle herbivory influenced floral resources and bee communities in low-diversity, former Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) pastures managed with patch-burn grazing. We sampled bee communities and floral resources three times per season in 2017, 2018, and 2019. We used plant-pollinator line transect sampling and collected bees and counted all flowering stems within 1 m. Across all years, we found that floral abundance, floral richness, floral diversity (Simpson's) and bee richness and abundance were significantly higher in cattle pastures compared to sheep. In cattle pastures, 46 native bee species plus honey bees interacted with 25 of 68 available flowering forbs. In sheep pastures, we recorded 14 native bee species and honey bees interacted with 10 of 34 flowering species. Native bee abundance and native bee richness were best explained by models that included an interaction of floral richness and year. Overall, our results suggest that season-long sheep grazing in low-diversity grasslands greatly reduces available floral resources and correlates with much lower bee abundance and native bee diversity. Given the importance of pollinators to natural and agricultural systems, it is imperative that we take proactive actions to increase forb richness and native flower abundance in seminatural lands to maintain a more diverse and resilient bee community that can continue to support pollination services and global food security.

摘要

在农业景观中,本地蜜蜂通常依赖有限的自然和半自然土地来提供维持其生存所需的大部分食物和筑巢资源。为了更好地了解管理如何影响这些半自然地区的传粉媒介,我们比较了绵羊或牛的食草性如何影响低多样性、前保护储备计划 (CRP) 牧场的花卉资源和蜜蜂群落,这些牧场采用斑块燃烧放牧管理。我们在 2017 年、2018 年和 2019 年每个季节进行了三次蜜蜂群落和花卉资源采样。我们使用植物-传粉媒介线截距采样,收集蜜蜂并在 1 米内统计所有开花茎。在所有年份中,我们发现牛牧场的花卉丰度、花卉丰富度、花卉多样性(辛普森)、蜜蜂丰富度和丰度明显高于绵羊牧场。在牛牧场中,46 种本地蜜蜂物种加上蜜蜂与 68 种可用开花草本植物中的 25 种相互作用。在绵羊牧场中,我们记录了 14 种本地蜜蜂物种和蜜蜂与 34 种开花物种中的 10 种相互作用。本地蜜蜂丰度和本地蜜蜂丰富度最好由包括花卉丰富度和年份相互作用的模型解释。总体而言,我们的结果表明,在低多样性草地中,绵羊的季节性放牧大大减少了可用的花卉资源,与蜜蜂丰度和本地蜜蜂多样性明显降低有关。鉴于传粉媒介对自然和农业系统的重要性,我们必须采取积极行动,增加半自然土地中草本植物的丰富度和本地花卉的丰度,以维持一个更加多样化和有弹性的蜜蜂群落,继续支持授粉服务和全球粮食安全。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验