Food Science and Human Nutrition, College of Human Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
Food Science and Human Nutrition, College of Human Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2021 Jul;53(7):564-572. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2021.04.459.
To assess the prevalence of plant-based alternatives to meat consumption in students at a Midwest university, describe associations between demographics, environmental concern attitudes, and consumption, and determine variables statistically associated with trying the plant-based alternatives.
Descriptive cross-sectional convenience sample; self-administered online surveys.
College students at a Midwest university.
Currently enrolled students aged 18-30 taking courses on campus as of March 2020.
Plant-based alternative consumption; demographics; vegetarian status; environmental attitudes; influences on food choices; and trusted sources of food information.
Bivariate comparisons for consumption of plant-based alternatives; logistic regression analysis.
Fifty-five percent had tried a plant-based meat alternative. Top reasons were enjoying new foods and curiosity about the products. Out-of-state residency, vegetarian status, and 10 of 11 environmental attitude statements were significantly associated with plant-based alternative consumption (P < 0.05). About 30% of consumers indicated they wanted to eat less meat and that plant alternatives were better for the environment. Nonconsumers had less favorable views of meatless meals.
This study supports that positive environmental attitudes were predictive of plant-based alternative consumption among college students. Increased awareness and familiarity could encourage consumption among this population.
评估中西部某大学学生中肉类植物替代品的消费流行情况,描述人口统计学、环境关注态度与消费之间的关联,并确定与尝试植物替代品相关的统计学变量。
描述性横断面便利样本;在线自我管理问卷调查。
中西部某大学的大学生。
截至 2020 年 3 月,在校修读课程、年龄在 18-30 岁之间的目前注册学生。
植物性替代品的消费情况;人口统计学;素食状况;环境态度;对食物选择的影响因素;以及食物信息的信任来源。
对植物性替代品的消费进行双变量比较;逻辑回归分析。
55%的人尝试过植物性肉类替代品。最主要的原因是喜欢新的食物和对这些产品感到好奇。州外居住、素食状况以及 11 个环境态度陈述中的 10 个与植物性替代品的消费显著相关(P < 0.05)。约 30%的消费者表示他们想少吃肉,并且植物替代品对环境更好。非消费者对无肉餐的看法不太乐观。
本研究表明,积极的环境态度可以预测大学生对植物性替代品的消费。提高认识和熟悉度可以鼓励这一人群的消费。