University of Health Sciences, Ankara Ulucanlar Eye Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Turk J Med Sci. 2021 Oct;51(5):2616-2620. doi: 10.3906/sag-2007-304. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
Subthreshold yellow nondamaging retinal laser therapy (NRT) could provide a greater safety profile when compared to conventional laser methods. NRT may also improve diabetic macular edema (DME). This study aims to assess whether the severity of DME affects the efficacy of subthreshold yellow NRT.
The study included 70 eyes that had previously been treated with ranibizumab for DME and then developed recurrent macular edema, which was treated with NRT once. The central foveal thickness (CFT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were evaluated retrospectively 2 months following the NRT. The eyes in the study were divided into 4 different groups according to the baseline CFT values. The initial CFT was 250-300 μm in Group 1 (n = 26), 301-400 μm in Group 2 (n = 24), and >401 μm in Group 3 (n = 20). Group 4 (n = 20) included control subjects with 250-300 µm CFT, diagnosed with DME, and not previously treated. The alterations in the BCVA and CFT were measured.
In the study, it was determined that 45 right eyes and 45 left eyes were involved. Statistically significant decrements (42.84 m reduction) in CFT were detected only in the Group 1 (p = 0.01). There was no significant improvement in CFT within Group 2, 3 and 4 (p = 0.29, p = 0.73, p = 0.22, respectively). Solely Group 1 had statistically significant improvement (from 0.54 to 0.39 LogMAR) in BCVA (p = 0.01), while groups 2, 3 and 4 had no improvement at all (p = 0.74, p = 0.96, p = 0.66 respectively).
Based on the results, NRT provided an improvement in BCVA and CFT in eyes with CFT less than 300 µm at the shortterm follow-up. However, CFT and BCVA outcomes after NRT were inferior to those achieved after previous ranibizumab treatment. No positive effect of NRT was not observed in patients with moderate and severe macular edema in DME treatment.
亚阈值黄色非损伤性视网膜激光治疗(NRT)与传统激光方法相比,具有更高的安全性。NRT 还可能改善糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)。本研究旨在评估 DME 的严重程度是否影响亚阈值黄色 NRT 的疗效。
该研究纳入了 70 只眼,这些眼先前曾接受雷珠单抗治疗 DME,随后出现复发性黄斑水肿,随后接受了一次 NRT 治疗。回顾性评估 NRT 后 2 个月的中央视网膜厚度(CFT)和最佳矫正视力(BCVA)。根据基线 CFT 值,将研究中的眼分为 4 个不同的组。第 1 组(n = 26)的初始 CFT 为 250-300μm,第 2 组(n = 24)的初始 CFT 为 301-400μm,第 3 组(n = 20)的初始 CFT >401μm。第 4 组(n = 20)包括基线 CFT 为 250-300μm、诊断为 DME 且未接受过治疗的对照组。测量 BCVA 和 CFT 的变化。
本研究共涉及 45 只右眼和 45 只左眼。仅第 1 组(p = 0.01)观察到 CFT 显著降低(42.84μm 降低)。第 2、3 和 4 组的 CFT 均无显著改善(p = 0.29、p = 0.73、p = 0.22)。仅第 1 组的 BCVA 有统计学显著改善(从 0.54 降至 0.39 LogMAR)(p = 0.01),而第 2、3 和 4 组均无改善(p = 0.74、p = 0.96、p = 0.66)。
基于研究结果,NRT 在短期随访时,对 CFT 小于 300μm 的眼提供了 BCVA 和 CFT 的改善。然而,NRT 后 CFT 和 BCVA 的结果劣于先前雷珠单抗治疗的结果。在 DME 治疗中,对于中度和重度黄斑水肿患者,NRT 未观察到积极作用。