Song Xinzhi, Jiang Nan, Li Honghe, Ding Ning, Wen Deliang
Institute for International Health Professions Education and Research, China Medical University, No. 77 Puhe Road, Shenyang, 110122 People's Republic of China.
Scientometrics. 2021;126(9):8009-8027. doi: 10.1007/s11192-021-03993-0. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
UNLABELLED: An abundance of publications on medical professionalism have been published in recent years. Our study aimed to analyze the external characteristics of publications on professionalism using bibliometrics, to describe its current developments and trends, and to explore professionalism research hotspots using co-word analysis. We retrieved literature on professionalism published from 2010 to 2019 from the Web of Science database. Histcite and CiteSpace were used to analyze external characteristics of publications, including publication trends and distributions of publications by country/region, institution, author, and journal. Co-word analysis was conducted to analyze research hotspots, using the Bibliographic Item Co-Occurrence Matrix Builder and Graphical Clustering Toolkit. We constructed a strategic diagram to show the state of each research hotspot and the relationship between the various hotspots in this field. Results showed publications on professionalism increased in number year by year as a whole. The USA, including its institutions and authors, maintained the top position worldwide in terms of numbers of publications and citations. Among scholarly journals, has published more articles and has had higher citations per paper than any other journal. Six research hotspots on professionalism were identified, visualized, and expounded. Of these, the theme of "measurement and evaluation of clinical competence" received the most attention in the field of professionalism. The reporting of quantifiable knowledge on the characteristics and research hotspots of publications could help inform gaps in the field of medical professionalism and provide evidence and guidance for future work for researchers, physicians, and educators. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11192-021-03993-0.
未标注:近年来,关于医学职业精神的出版物大量涌现。我们的研究旨在运用文献计量学分析职业精神出版物的外部特征,描述其当前的发展情况和趋势,并通过共词分析探索职业精神研究热点。我们从科学网数据库中检索了2010年至2019年发表的关于职业精神的文献。使用Histcite和CiteSpace分析出版物的外部特征,包括出版趋势以及出版物在国家/地区、机构、作者和期刊方面的分布情况。运用文献共现矩阵构建器和图形聚类工具包进行共词分析,以分析研究热点。我们构建了一个战略图来展示每个研究热点的状态以及该领域各个热点之间的关系。结果表明,总体而言,关于职业精神的出版物数量逐年增加。美国及其机构和作者在出版物数量和被引次数方面在全球保持领先地位。在学术期刊中,《》发表的文章比其他任何期刊都多,且每篇文章的被引次数更高。确定、可视化并阐述了职业精神的六个研究热点。其中,“临床能力的测量与评估”主题在职业精神领域受到的关注最多。对出版物的特征和研究热点的可量化知识进行报道,有助于了解医学职业精神领域的差距,并为研究人员、医生和教育工作者的未来工作提供证据和指导。 补充信息:在线版本包含可在10.1007/s11192-021-03993-0获取的补充材料。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022-12
Arch Osteoporos. 2021-4-17
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2025-1-12
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023-6-5
Front Reprod Health. 2022-5-9
J Patient Saf. 2019-12
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2020