Woch Marcin W, Kapusta Paweł, Stanek Małgorzata, Zubek Szymon, Stefanowicz Anna M
Institute of Biology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Lwowska 1, PL- 87-100 Toruń, Poland.
Władysław Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lubicz 46, PL-31-512 Kraków, Poland.
AoB Plants. 2021 Jun 3;13(4):plab035. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plab035. eCollection 2021 Aug.
is one of the most harmful invasive species in the world, dramatically reducing the diversity of resident vegetation. To mitigate the impact of on ecosystems and properly manage affected areas, understanding the mechanisms behind this plant's invasive success is imperative. This study aimed to comprehensively analyse plant communities invaded by , taking into account species traits, habitat conditions and seasonal variability, and to determine the ecological profile of species that withstand the invader's pressure. The study was performed in fallow and riparian areas in southern Poland. Pairs of adjacent plots were established at 25 sites with no obvious signs of recent human disturbance. One plot contained , and the other contained only resident vegetation. For each plot, botanical data were collected and soil physicochemical properties were determined. Twelve sites were surveyed four times, in two springs and two summers, to capture seasonal variability. The presence of was strongly associated with reduced resident plant species diversity and/or abundance. In addition to the ability to quickly grow and form a dense canopy that shades the ground, the success of the invader likely resulted from the production of large amounts of hard-to-decompose litter. The indirect impact of by controlling the availability of nutrients in the soil might also play a role. A few species coexisted with . They can be classified into three groups: (i) spring ephemerals - geophytic forbs with a mixed life history strategy, (ii) lianas with a competitive strategy and (iii) hemicryptophytic forbs with a competitive strategy. Species from the first two groups likely avoided competition for light by temporal or spatial niche separation (they grew earlier than or above the invasive plant), whereas the high competitive abilities of species from the third group likely enabled them to survive in patches.
是世界上最具危害性的入侵物种之一,极大地降低了当地植被的多样性。为减轻其对生态系统的影响并妥善管理受影响区域,了解这种植物入侵成功背后的机制至关重要。本研究旨在综合分析被入侵的植物群落,考虑物种特征、栖息地条件和季节变化,并确定能抵御入侵者压力的物种的生态特征。该研究在波兰南部的休耕区和河岸地区进行。在25个没有近期明显人类干扰迹象的地点设立了成对的相邻样地。一个样地有该入侵物种,另一个样地只有当地植被。对每个样地收集植物学数据并测定土壤理化性质。在两个春季和两个夏季对12个地点进行了四次调查,以捕捉季节变化。该入侵物种的存在与当地植物物种多样性和/或丰度的降低密切相关。除了能够快速生长并形成浓密的树冠遮蔽地面外,入侵者的成功可能还源于产生了大量难以分解的凋落物。该入侵物种通过控制土壤中养分的有效性产生的间接影响也可能起了作用。有少数物种与该入侵物种共存。它们可分为三组:(i)春季短命植物——具有混合生活史策略的地生草本植物,(ii)具有竞争策略的藤本植物和(iii)具有竞争策略的半隐生草本植物。前两组的物种可能通过时间或空间生态位分离避免了对光照的竞争(它们比入侵植物生长得早或生长在入侵植物之上),而第三组物种的高竞争能力可能使它们能够在有该入侵物种斑块中生存。