Hastings Cent Rep. 2021 Jul;51(4):7-8. doi: 10.1002/hast.1266.
One of the biggest policy interventions during the last year of the COVID-19 pandemic was the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Securities Act, instituting a novel form of economic relief similar to a universal basic income. The economic impact payments, colloquially known as "stimulus checks," were distributed based on the socioeconomic status of American citizens and legal residents and provided much-needed financial aid. However, the distribution of these payments paid little attention to other important factors that might determine the economic security of said individuals, such as race and gender. This article calls for policy-makers to pay particular attention to how structural inequity and discrimination based on identity could affect the efficacy of proposed policies and demonstrate an ethic of care informed by an understanding of intersectionality.
在新冠疫情大流行的最后一年,最大的政策干预之一是《冠状病毒援助、救济和经济安全法案》,该法案实施了一种类似于普遍基本收入的新型经济救助形式。经济影响支付,俗称“刺激检查”,根据美国公民和合法居民的社会经济地位分配,为他们提供了急需的财政援助。然而,这些支付的分配很少关注其他可能决定这些个人经济安全的重要因素,例如种族和性别。本文呼吁政策制定者特别注意结构性不平等和基于身份的歧视如何影响拟议政策的效果,并展示一种基于对交叉性理解的关怀伦理。