Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH.
Hepatology. 2021 Dec;74(6):2952-2964. doi: 10.1002/hep.32053. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
Multiple direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens are available to treat HCV genotype 1 infection. However, comparative effectiveness from randomized controlled trials of DAA regimens is unavailable.
We conducted a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (NCT02786537) to compare the effectiveness of DAAs for HCV genotype 1a or 1b on viral response, safety, tolerability, and medication nonadherence. Adults with compensated liver disease, HCV genotype 1, not pregnant or breastfeeding, and with health insurance likely to cover ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) were recruited from 34 US viral hepatitis clinics. Participants were randomized (± ribavirin) to LDV/SOF, elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR), and paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir+dasabuvir (PrOD; treatment arm stopped early). Primary outcomes included sustained viral response at 12 weeks (SVR12), clinician-recorded adverse events, patient-reported symptoms, and medication nonadherence. Between June 2016 and March 2018, 1,609 participants were randomized. Among 1,128 participants who received ≥1 dose of EBR/GZR or LDV/SOF (± ribavirin), SVR12 was 95.2% (95% CI, 92.8%-97.6%) and 97.4% (95% CI, 95.5%-99.2%), respectively, with a difference estimate of 2.2% (-0.5% to 4.7%), falling within the "equivalence" interval (-5% to 5%). While most (56%) participants experienced adverse events, few were serious (4.2%) or severe (1.8%). In the absence of ribavirin, discontinuations due to adverse events were rare. Patient-reported symptoms and medication nonadherence were similar. Study limitations were dropout due to insurance denial and loss to follow-up after treatment, limiting the ability to measure SVR12.
This pragmatic trial demonstrated high SVR12 for participants treated with EBR/GZR and LDV/SOF with few adverse effects. Overall, the two regimens were equivalent in effectiveness. The results support current HCV guidelines that do not distinguish between ribavirin-free EBR/GZR and LDV/SOF.
目前有多种直接作用抗病毒药物(DAA)方案可用于治疗 HCV 基因型 1 感染。然而,尚无关于 DAA 方案的随机对照试验比较其有效性的信息。
我们开展了一项实用型随机对照试验(NCT02786537),以比较治疗 HCV 基因型 1a 或 1b 的 DAA 方案在病毒学应答、安全性、耐受性和药物依从性方面的有效性。34 家美国病毒性肝炎诊所招募了患有代偿性肝病、HCV 基因型 1、未怀孕或哺乳且其医疗保险可能涵盖 ledipasvir/sofosbuvir(LDV/SOF)的成年人。参与者按(±利巴韦林)随机分配至 LDV/SOF、elbasvir/grazoprevir(EBR/GZR)和 paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir+dasabuvir(PrOD;治疗组提前停药)。主要结局包括 12 周持续病毒学应答(SVR12)、临床医生记录的不良事件、患者报告的症状和药物不依从。2016 年 6 月至 2018 年 3 月期间,共 1609 名参与者被随机分配。在接受 EBR/GZR 或 LDV/SOF(±利巴韦林)至少一剂的 1128 名参与者中,SVR12 分别为 95.2%(95%CI,92.8%-97.6%)和 97.4%(95%CI,95.5%-99.2%),差异估计值为 2.2%(-0.5%至 4.7%),落在“等效”区间(-5%至 5%)内。虽然大多数(56%)参与者出现了不良事件,但很少有严重(4.2%)或严重(1.8%)的不良事件。在不使用利巴韦林的情况下,因不良事件而停药的情况很少见。患者报告的症状和药物不依从性相似。研究的局限性在于由于保险拒付和治疗后随访丢失而导致的参与者脱落,这限制了对 SVR12 的测量。
这项实用试验表明,EBR/GZR 和 LDV/SOF 治疗的参与者 SVR12 较高,不良事件较少。总体而言,两种方案的疗效相当。结果支持当前不区分无利巴韦林 EBR/GZR 和 LDV/SOF 的 HCV 指南。