Cavender Katelyn R, Ricker Tessa A, Lyon Mackenzie O, Shelby Emily A, Miller Christine W, Moore Patricia J
Department of Entomology University of Georgia Athens GA USA.
Entomology and Nematology Department University of Florida Gainesville FL USA.
Ecol Evol. 2021 Jun 8;11(13):8776-8782. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7686. eCollection 2021 Jul.
Males have the ability to compete for fertilizations through both precopulatory and postcopulatory intrasexual competition. Precopulatory competition has selected for large weapons and other adaptations to maximize access to females and mating opportunities, while postcopulatory competition has resulted in ejaculate adaptations to maximize fertilization success. Negative associations between these strategies support the hypothesis that there is a trade-off between success at pre- and postcopulatory mating success. Recently, this trade-off has been demonstrated with experimental manipulation. Males of the leaf-footed cactus bug use hind limbs as the primary weapon in male-male competition. However, males can drop a hind limb to avoid entrapment. When this autotomy occurs during development, they invest instead in large testes. While evolutionary outcomes of the trade-offs between pre- and postcopulatory strategies have been identified, less work has been done to identify proximate mechanisms by which the trade-off might occur, perhaps because the systems in which the trade-offs have been investigated are not ones that have the molecular tools required for exploring mechanism. Here, we applied knowledge from a related model species for which we have developmental knowledge and molecular tools, the milkweed bug , to investigate the proximate mechanism by which autotomized . males developed larger testes. Autotomized males had evidence of a higher rate of transit amplification divisions in the spermatogonia, which would result more spermatocytes and thus in greater sperm numbers. Identification of mechanisms underlying a trade-off can help our understanding of the direction and constraints on evolutionary trajectories and thus the evolutionary potential under multiple forms of selection.
雄性具有通过交配前和交配后的同性竞争来争夺受精机会的能力。交配前的竞争促使雄性进化出大型武器和其他适应性特征,以最大限度地接近雌性并获得交配机会,而交配后的竞争则导致射精适应性变化,以最大化受精成功率。这些策略之间的负相关关系支持了这样一种假设,即在交配前和交配后的成功之间存在权衡。最近,这种权衡已通过实验操作得到证实。叶足仙人掌蝽的雄性在雄性间竞争中使用后肢作为主要武器。然而,雄性可以舍弃一条后肢以避免被困。当这种自切在发育过程中发生时,它们会转而投入资源发育大型睾丸。虽然已经确定了交配前和交配后策略之间权衡的进化结果,但对于这种权衡可能发生的近端机制的研究较少,这可能是因为所研究的权衡系统并不具备探索机制所需的分子工具。在这里,我们利用来自一个我们有发育知识和分子工具的相关模式物种——乳草蝽的知识,来研究自切雄性发育出更大睾丸的近端机制。自切雄性的精原细胞有更高的过渡增殖分裂率的证据,这会产生更多的精母细胞,从而导致精子数量增加。确定权衡背后的机制有助于我们理解进化轨迹的方向和限制,进而理解多种选择形式下的进化潜力。