Department of Pediatric Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Department of Surgery, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, VA.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2021 Nov 1;22(11):e594-e598. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002795.
Distance to subspecialty surgical care is a known impediment to the delivery of high-quality healthcare. Extracorporeal life support is of benefit to pediatric patients with specific medical conditions. Despite a continued increase in the number of extracorporeal life support centers, not all children have equal access to extracorporeal life support due to geographic constraints, creating a potential disparity in healthcare. We attempted to better define the variation in geographic proximity to extracorporeal life support centers for pediatric patients using the U.S. Decennial Census.
A publicly available listing of voluntarily reporting extracorporeal life support centers in 2019 and the 2010 Decennial Census were used to calculate straight-line distances between extracorporeal life support zip code centroids and census block centroids. Disparities in distance to care associated with urbanization were analyzed.
United States.
None.
Large database review.
There were 136 centers providing pediatric extracorporeal life support in 2019. The distribution varied by state with Texas, California, and Florida having the most centers. Over 16 million children (23% of the pediatric population) live greater than 60 miles from an extracorporeal life support center. Significant disparity exists between urban and rural locations with over 47% of children in a rural setting living greater than 60 miles from an extracorporeal life support center compared with 17% of children living in an urban setting.
Disparities in proximity to extracorporeal life support centers were present and persistent across states. Children in rural areas have less access to extracorporeal life support centers based upon geographic distance alone. These findings may affect practice patterns and treatment decisions and are important to the development of regionalization strategies to ensure all children have subspecialty surgical care available to them, including extracorporeal life support.
距离专科手术护理的距离是提供高质量医疗保健的已知障碍。体外生命支持对具有特定医疗条件的儿科患者有益。尽管体外生命支持中心的数量持续增加,但由于地理位置的限制,并非所有儿童都能平等获得体外生命支持,这造成了医疗保健的潜在差距。我们试图使用美国十年一次的人口普查数据更好地定义儿科患者与体外生命支持中心的地理接近程度的差异。
使用 2019 年自愿报告的体外生命支持中心的公开列表和 2010 年十年一次的人口普查数据来计算体外生命支持邮政编码质心和人口普查块质心之间的直线距离。分析了与城市化相关的护理距离差异。
美国。
无。
大型数据库审查。
2019 年有 136 个中心提供儿科体外生命支持。分布因州而异,德克萨斯州、加利福尼亚州和佛罗里达州拥有最多的中心。超过 1600 万儿童(儿科人口的 23%)居住在距离体外生命支持中心 60 英里以上的地方。城市和农村地区之间存在显著差异,超过 47%的农村地区儿童居住在距离体外生命支持中心 60 英里以上的地方,而居住在城市地区的儿童只有 17%。
各州之间存在且持续存在接近体外生命支持中心的差异。仅根据地理位置,农村地区的儿童获得体外生命支持中心的机会较少。这些发现可能会影响实践模式和治疗决策,对于制定区域化战略以确保所有儿童都能获得专科手术护理(包括体外生命支持)非常重要。