Petley Lauren, Hunter Lisa L, Motlagh Zadeh Lina, Stewart Hannah J, Sloat Nicholette T, Perdew Audrey, Lin Li, Moore David R
Communication Sciences Research Center, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.
Department of Psychology, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY.
Ear Hear. 2021;42(6):1640-1655. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001076.
Children presenting at audiology services with caregiver-reported listening difficulties often have normal audiograms. The appropriate approach for the further assessment and clinical management of these children is currently unclear. In this Sensitive Indicators of Childhood Listening Difficulties (SICLiD) study, we assessed listening ability using a reliable and validated caregiver questionnaire (the Evaluation of Children's Listening and Processing Skills [ECLiPS]) in a large (n = 146) and heterogeneous sample of 6- to 13-year-old children with normal audiograms. Scores on the ECLiPS were related to a multifaceted laboratory assessment of the children's audiological, psycho- and physiological-acoustic, and cognitive abilities. This report is an overview of the SICLiD study and focuses on the children's behavioral performance. The overall goals of SICLiD were to understand the auditory and other neural mechanisms underlying childhood listening difficulties and translate that understanding into clinical assessment and, ultimately, intervention.
Cross-sectional behavioral assessment of children with "listening difficulties" and an age-matched "typically developing" control group. Caregivers completed the ECLiPS, and the resulting total standardized composite score formed the basis of further descriptive statistics, univariate, and multivariate modeling of experimental data.
All scores of the ECLiPS, the SCAN-3:C, a standardized clinical test suite for auditory processing, and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Cognition Toolbox were significantly lower for children with listening difficulties than for their typically developing peers using group comparisons via t-tests and Wilcoxon Rank-Sum tests. A similar effect was observed on the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences (LiSN-S) test for speech sentence-in-noise intelligibility but only reached significance for the Low Cue and High Cue conditions and the Talker Advantage derived score. Stepwise regression to examine the factors contributing to the ECLiPS Total scaled score (pooled across groups) yielded a model that explained 42% of its variance based on the SCAN-3:C composite, LiSN-S Talker Advantage, and the NIH Toolbox Picture Vocabulary, and Dimensional Change Card Sorting scores (F[4, 95] = 17.35, p < 0.001). High correlations were observed between many test scores including the ECLiPS, SCAN-3:C, and NIH Toolbox composite measures. LiSN-S Advantage measures generally correlated weakly and nonsignificantly with non-LiSN-S measures. However, a significant interaction was found between extended high-frequency threshold and LiSN-S Talker Advantage.
Children with listening difficulties but normal audiograms have problems with the cognitive processing of auditory and nonauditory stimuli that include both fluid and crystallized reasoning. Analysis of poor performance on the LiSN-S Talker Advantage measure identified subclinical hearing loss as a minor contributing factor to talker segregation. Beyond auditory tests, evaluations of children with complaints of listening difficulties should include standardized caregiver observations and consideration of broad cognitive abilities.
在听力学服务机构就诊、被照料者报告有听力困难的儿童,其听力图往往正常。目前尚不清楚对这些儿童进行进一步评估和临床管理的合适方法。在这项儿童听力困难敏感指标(SICLiD)研究中,我们使用一份可靠且经过验证的照料者问卷(儿童听力与处理技能评估[ECLiPS]),对146名年龄在6至13岁、听力图正常的儿童进行了大规模且异质性的样本研究,以评估他们的听力能力。ECLiPS的得分与对儿童听力、心理和生理声学以及认知能力的多方面实验室评估相关。本报告是SICLiD研究的概述,重点关注儿童的行为表现。SICLiD的总体目标是了解儿童听力困难背后的听觉及其他神经机制,并将这种理解转化为临床评估,最终实现干预。
对有“听力困难”的儿童和年龄匹配的“发育正常”对照组进行横断面行为评估。照料者完成ECLiPS,所得的总标准化综合得分构成了进一步描述性统计、单变量和多变量实验数据建模的基础。
通过t检验和Wilcoxon秩和检验进行组间比较,有听力困难的儿童在ECLiPS、SCAN - 3:C(一种用于听觉处理的标准化临床测试套件)以及美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)认知工具箱的所有得分,均显著低于发育正常的同龄人。在空间化噪声句子中的听力(LiSN - S)测试中,对于语音噪声中的句子可懂度也观察到了类似的效果,但仅在低线索和高线索条件以及说话者优势衍生得分方面达到显著水平。逐步回归分析用于检验对ECLiPS总量表得分(跨组汇总)有贡献的因素,得出一个模型,该模型基于SCAN - 3:C综合得分、LiSN - S说话者优势得分以及NIH工具箱图片词汇和维度变化卡片分类得分,解释了其42%的方差(F[4, 95] = 17.35,p < 0.001)。在包括ECLiPS、SCAN - 3:C和NIH工具箱综合测量在内的许多测试得分之间观察到高度相关性。LiSN - S优势测量通常与非LiSN - S测量的相关性较弱且不显著。然而,在扩展高频阈值和LiSN - S说话者优势之间发现了显著的交互作用。
听力困难但听力图正常的儿童在听觉和非听觉刺激的认知处理方面存在问题,包括流体推理和晶体推理。对LiSN - S说话者优势测量中表现不佳的分析表明,亚临床听力损失是导致说话者分离的一个次要因素。除了听觉测试外,对有听力困难主诉的儿童进行评估应包括标准化的照料者观察以及对广泛认知能力的考量。