Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
MR Applications and Workflow, GE Healthcare, Tokyo, Japan.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022 Jan;55(1):178-187. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27823. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
Although perfusion imaging plays a key role in the management of steno-occlusive diseases, the clinical usefulness of arterial spin labeling (ASL) is limited by technical issues.
To examine the effect of arterial transit time (ATT) prolongation on cerebral blood flow (CBF) measurement accuracy and identify the best CBF measurement protocol for steno-occlusive diseases.
Prospective.
Moyamoya (n = 10) and atherosclerotic diseases (n = 8).
FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: A 3.0T/3DT -weighted and ASL.
Hadamard-encoded multidelay ASL scans with/without vessel suppression (VS) and single-delay ASL scans with long-label duration (LD) and long postlabeling delay (PLD), referred to as long-label long-delay (LLLD), were acquired. CBF measurement accuracy and its ATT dependency, measured as the correlation between the relative CBF measurement difference (ASL-single-photon emission computed tomography [SPECT]) and ATT, were compared among 1) Combo (incorporating multidelay and LLLD data based on ATT), 2) standard (LD/PLD = 1333/2333 msec), and 3) LLLD (LD/PLD = 4000/4000 msec) protocols, using whole-brain voxel-wise correlation with reference standard SPECT CBF. The effect of VS on CBF measurement accuracy was also assessed.
Pearson's correlation coefficient, repeated-measures analysis of variance, t-test. P< 0.05 was considered significant.
Pearson's correlation coefficients between ASL and SPECT CBF measurements were as follows: Combo = 0.55 ± 0.09; standard = 0.52 ± 0.12; LLLD = 0.41 ± 0.10. CBF measurement was least accurate in LLLD and most accurate in Combo. VS significantly improved overall CBF measurement accuracy in the standard protocol and in moyamoya patients for the Combo. ATT dependency analysis revealed that, compared with Combo, the standard and LLLD protocols showed significantly lower and negative and significantly higher and positive correlations, respectively (standard = -0.12 ± 0.04, Combo = -0.04 ± 0.03, LLLD = 0.17 ± 0.03).
By using ATT-corrected CBF derived from LD/PLD = 1333/2333 msec as a base and by compensating underestimation in delayed regions using multidelay scans, the ATT-based Combo strategy improves CBF measurement accuracy compared with single-delay protocols in severe steno-occlusive diseases.
1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
尽管灌注成像是狭窄-闭塞性疾病管理中的关键,但动脉自旋标记(ASL)的临床应用受到技术问题的限制。
探讨动脉渡越时间(ATT)延长对脑血流(CBF)测量准确性的影响,并确定适用于狭窄-闭塞性疾病的最佳 CBF 测量方案。
前瞻性。
烟雾病(n=10)和动脉粥样硬化性疾病(n=8)。
磁场强度/序列:3.0T/3DT -加权和 ASL。
采用 Hadamard 编码的多延迟 ASL 扫描(带/不带血管抑制(VS))和单延迟 ASL 扫描(长标记持续时间(LD)和长标记后延迟(PLD)),称为长标记长延迟(LLLD),获取脑血流测量准确性及其与 ATT 的相关性,以 ASL-单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)的相对 CBF 测量差异(ASL-single-photon emission computed tomography [SPECT])与 ATT 的相关性来衡量,比较 1)Combo(基于 ATT 整合多延迟和 LLLD 数据),2)标准(LD/PLD=1333/2333msec)和 3)LLLD(LD/PLD=4000/4000msec)方案,采用全脑体素-wise 相关性与参考标准 SPECT CBF。还评估了 VS 对 CBF 测量准确性的影响。
Pearson 相关系数、重复测量方差分析、t 检验。P<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。
ASL 与 SPECT CBF 测量之间的 Pearson 相关系数如下:Combo=0.55±0.09;标准=0.52±0.12;LLLD=0.41±0.10。在 LLLD 中 CBF 测量的准确性最低,在 Combo 中最高。VS 显著提高了标准方案中的整体 CBF 测量准确性,并且在烟雾病患者中对 Combo 也有显著改善。ATT 依赖性分析表明,与 Combo 相比,标准和 LLLD 方案分别显示出较低和负相关,以及较高和正相关(标准=-0.12±0.04,Combo=-0.04±0.03,LLLD=0.17±0.03)。
通过使用 LD/PLD=1333/2333msec 作为基础,校正 ATT 后的 CBF,并使用多延迟扫描补偿延迟区域的低估,与单延迟方案相比,基于 ATT 的 Combo 策略可提高严重狭窄-闭塞性疾病中的 CBF 测量准确性。
1 技术功效:2 级。