文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗对比纳武利尤单抗用于治疗既往接受过治疗的 IV 期鳞状细胞肺癌患者:Lung-MAP S1400I 期随机临床研究。

Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab vs Nivolumab for Previously Treated Patients With Stage IV Squamous Cell Lung Cancer: The Lung-MAP S1400I Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut.

SWOG Statistical Center, Seattle, Washington.

出版信息

JAMA Oncol. 2021 Sep 1;7(9):1368-1377. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.2209.


DOI:10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.2209
PMID:34264316
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8283667/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab is superior to platinum-based chemotherapy in treatment-naive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nivolumab is superior to docetaxel in advanced pretreated NSCLC. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the addition of ipilimumab to nivolumab improves survival in patients with advanced, pretreated, immunotherapy-naive squamous (Sq) NSCLC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Lung Cancer Master Protocol (Lung-MAP) S1400I phase 3, open-label randomized clinical trial was conducted from December 18, 2015, to April 23, 2018, randomizing patients in a 1:1 ratio to nivolumab alone or combined with ipilimumab. The median follow-up in surviving patients was 29.5 months. The trial was conducted through the National Clinical Trials Network and included patients with advanced immunotherapy-naive SqNSCLC and a Zubrod score of 0 (asymptomatic) to 1 (symptomatic but completely ambulatory) with disease progression after standard platinum-based chemotherapy. Randomization was stratified by sex and number of prior therapies (1 vs 2 or more). Data were analyzed from May 3, 2018, to February 1, 2021. INTERVENTIONS: Nivolumab, 3 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks, with or without ipilimumab, 1 mg/kg intravenously every 6 weeks, until disease progression or intolerable toxic effects. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included investigator-assessed progression-free survival (IA-PFS) and response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guidelines, version 1.1. RESULTS: Of 275 enrolled patients, 252 (mean age, 67.5 years [range 41.8-90.3 years]; 169 men [67%]; 206 White patients [82%]) were deemed eligible (125 randomized to nivolumab/ipilimumab and 127 to nivolumab). The study was closed for futility at a planned interim analysis. Overall survival was not significantly different between the groups (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.66-1.16; P = .34). Median survival was 10 months (95% CI, 8.0-14.4 months) in the nivolumab/ipilimumab group and 11 months (95% CI, 8.6-13.7 months) in the nivolumab group. The IA-PFS HR was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.61-1.03; P = .09); median IA-PFS was 3.8 months (95% CI, 2.7-4.4 months) in the nivolumab/ipilimumab group and 2.9 months (95% CI, 1.8-4.0 months) in the nivolumab alone group. Response rates were 18% (95% CI, 12%-25%) with nivolumab/ipilimumab and 17% (95% CI, 10%-23%) with nivolumab. Median response duration was 28.4 months (95% CI, 4.9 months to not reached) with nivolumab/ipilimumab and 9.7 months with nivolumab (95% CI, 4.2-23.1 months). Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in 49 of 124 patients (39.5%) who received nivolumab/ipilimumab and in 41 of 123 (33.3%) who received nivolumab alone. Toxic effects led to discontinuation in 31 of 124 patients (25%) on nivolumab/ipilimumab and in 19 of 123 (15%) on nivolumab. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this phase 3 randomized clinical trial, ipilimumab added to nivolumab did not improve outcomes in patients with advanced, pretreated, immune checkpoint inhibitor-naive SqNSCLC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02785952.

摘要

重要性:纳武单抗联合伊匹单抗在治疗初治晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)方面优于铂类化疗。纳武单抗在晚期预处理 NSCLC 中优于多西他赛。 目的:确定在晚期预处理免疫治疗初治鳞状(Sq)NSCLC 患者中,添加伊匹单抗是否可以改善生存。 设计、地点和参与者:肺癌主方案(Lung-MAP)S1400I 是一项 3 期、开放性、随机临床试验,于 2015 年 12 月 18 日至 2018 年 4 月 23 日进行,将患者按 1:1 的比例随机分为纳武单抗单药治疗组或联合伊匹单抗治疗组。在存活患者中,中位随访时间为 29.5 个月。该试验通过国家临床试验网络进行,包括晚期免疫治疗初治 SqNSCLC 患者,Zubrod 评分为 0(无症状)至 1(有症状但完全能走动),且在标准铂类化疗后疾病进展。随机化按性别和治疗次数(1 次或 2 次或更多次)分层。数据分析于 2018 年 5 月 3 日至 2021 年 2 月 1 日进行。 干预措施:纳武单抗,3mg/kg,每 2 周静脉注射一次,联合或不联合伊匹单抗,1mg/kg,每 6 周静脉注射一次,直至疾病进展或不可耐受的毒性反应。 主要终点和次要终点:主要终点是总生存期(OS)。次要终点包括研究者评估的无进展生存期(IA-PFS)和根据实体瘤反应评价标准(RECIST),版本 1.1 评估的反应率。 结果:在 275 名入组患者中,252 名(平均年龄,67.5 岁[范围 41.8-90.3 岁];169 名男性[67%];206 名白人患者[82%])被认为符合条件(125 名随机分配至纳武单抗/伊匹单抗组,127 名至纳武单抗组)。在一项计划的中期分析中,该研究因疗效不佳而关闭。两组之间的总生存期无显著差异(风险比[HR],0.87;95%置信区间,0.66-1.16;P=0.34)。纳武单抗/伊匹单抗组的中位生存期为 10 个月(95%置信区间,8.0-14.4 个月),纳武单抗组为 11 个月(95%置信区间,8.6-13.7 个月)。IA-PFS 的 HR 为 0.80(95%置信区间,0.61-1.03;P=0.09);纳武单抗/伊匹单抗组的中位 IA-PFS 为 3.8 个月(95%置信区间,2.7-4.4 个月),纳武单抗组为 2.9 个月(95%置信区间,1.8-4.0 个月)。纳武单抗/伊匹单抗组的缓解率为 18%(95%置信区间,12%-25%),纳武单抗组为 17%(95%置信区间,10%-23%)。纳武单抗/伊匹单抗组的中位缓解持续时间为 28.4 个月(95%置信区间,4.9 个月至未达到),纳武单抗组为 9.7 个月(95%置信区间,4.2-23.1 个月)。纳武单抗/伊匹单抗组有 49 名(39.5%)患者和纳武单抗组有 41 名(33.3%)患者发生 3 级或更高级别的治疗相关不良事件。纳武单抗/伊匹单抗组有 31 名(25%)患者和纳武单抗组有 19 名(15%)患者因毒性作用而停止治疗。 结论和相关性:在这项 3 期随机临床试验中,在晚期预处理免疫检查点抑制剂初治鳞状 NSCLC 患者中,添加伊匹单抗并未改善生存。 试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02785952。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cea/8283667/7e5bc564b4a3/jamaoncol-e212209-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cea/8283667/e57dc6e85027/jamaoncol-e212209-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cea/8283667/220c5c006b45/jamaoncol-e212209-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cea/8283667/7e5bc564b4a3/jamaoncol-e212209-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cea/8283667/e57dc6e85027/jamaoncol-e212209-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cea/8283667/220c5c006b45/jamaoncol-e212209-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cea/8283667/7e5bc564b4a3/jamaoncol-e212209-g003.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab vs Nivolumab for Previously Treated Patients With Stage IV Squamous Cell Lung Cancer: The Lung-MAP S1400I Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA Oncol. 2021-9-1

[2]
Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab vs Nivolumab Alone for Treatment of Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: The Phase 2 CheckMate 714 Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA Oncol. 2023-6-1

[3]
Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus carboplatin-based doublet as first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer aged ≥70 years or with an ECOG performance status of 2 (GFPC 08-2015 ENERGY): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study.

Lancet Respir Med. 2025-2

[4]
First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab combined with two cycles of chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 9LA): an international, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

Lancet Oncol. 2021-2

[5]
Nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 012): results of an open-label, phase 1, multicohort study.

Lancet Oncol. 2017-1

[6]
Tislelizumab Plus Chemotherapy vs Chemotherapy Alone as First-line Treatment for Advanced Squamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA Oncol. 2021-5-1

[7]
Single or combined immune checkpoint inhibitors compared to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-12-14

[8]
Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: extended follow-up of efficacy and safety results from a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.

Lancet Oncol. 2019-8-16

[9]
Single or combined immune checkpoint inhibitors compared to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-30

[10]
First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab combined with two cycles of chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a subanalysis of Asian patients in CheckMate 9LA.

Int J Clin Oncol. 2022-4

引用本文的文献

[1]
Immune-Related Cutaneous Adverse Events Display Distinct Clinical and Molecular Characteristics, Depending on Immune Checkpoints Targeted.

Cancers (Basel). 2025-6-14

[2]
Harm-Benefit Balance of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

JAMA Oncol. 2025-5-8

[3]
Successful treatment of an elderly patient with lung squamous cell carcinoma by tislelizumab and chemotherapy: a case report with novel imaging findings.

Front Immunol. 2025-3-24

[4]
Optimal early endpoint for second-line or subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitors in previously treated advanced solid cancers: a systematic review.

BMC Cancer. 2025-2-18

[5]
Novel Spatial Approaches to Dissect the Lung Cancer Immune Microenvironment.

Cancers (Basel). 2024-12-12

[6]
Immunotherapy for advanced-stage squamous cell lung cancer: the state of the art and outstanding questions.

Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2025-3

[7]
Is nivolumab alone or in combination with ipilimumab more effective for treating lung cancer? a meta-analysis.

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2025-2

[8]
Polymeric Multivalent Fc Binding Peptides-Fabricated Clinical Compounding Bispecific Antibody Potentiates Dual Immunotherapy Targeting PD1 and CTLA-4.

Adv Sci (Weinh). 2025-1

[9]
Predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint efficacy: is multi-omics breaking the deadlock?

Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2024-10-31

[10]
VASH2 enhances KIF3C-mediated EGFR-endosomal recycling to promote aggression and chemoresistance of lung squamous cell carcinoma by increasing tubulin detyrosination.

Cell Death Dis. 2024-10-23

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索