Department of Psychology, University of Jaén.
Department of Psychology, Boston College.
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2021 Apr;47(2):137-149. doi: 10.1037/xan0000288.
Two experiments evaluated whether the experience of extinction makes acquisition context specific (EMACS) while the extinction learning itself also becomes context dependent under ABA and ABC renewal designs in a human predictive learning situation. Two groups of participants received X-Outcome pairings in context A followed by P-Outcome pairings in context B. For participants in group E, cue X was then extinguished in context B while cue P was trained. Participants in group NE were trained with P, but they did not have the extinction experience. Testing target cues outside the context B (i.e. the context in which P was trained and X was extinguished) in group E led to an increase in responding to cue X (Renewal effect) and a decrease in responding to cue P (EMACS effect) regardless of whether the test was conducted in context A (Experiment 1) or in an alternative context C (Experiment 2). Combined results suggest that Renewal and EMACS effects may be based on the same underlying mechanism. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
两项实验评估了在人类预测性学习情境中,消退经验是否会使获得的上下文变得特定(EMACS),而消退学习本身在 ABA 和 ABC 更替设计下也会变得依赖上下文。两组参与者在 A 情境中接受 X-结果配对,然后在 B 情境中接受 P-结果配对。对于组 E 的参与者,在 B 情境中对线索 X 进行消退,而对线索 P 进行训练。组 NE 的参与者接受 P 的训练,但没有经历消退经验。在组 E 中,在 B 情境之外的测试目标线索(即 P 被训练和 X 被消退的情境)会导致对线索 X 的反应增加(更替效应),以及对线索 P 的反应减少(EMACS 效应),无论测试是在 A 情境中(实验 1)还是在替代情境 C 中(实验 2)进行。综合结果表明,更替效应和 EMACS 效应可能基于相同的潜在机制。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。