文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Comparison of 10.6 μm Laser Moxibustion with Traditional Moxibustion in Knee Osteoarthritic Therapy: A Randomized Noninferiority Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Fang Jing, Huang Zouqin, Wang Xiangyun, Chen Lusheng, Cheng Ke, Deng Haiping, Lin Lin, Zhao Ling, Shen Xueyong

机构信息

Acupuncture and Tuina School, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Acupuncture Department, Shanghai Pudong New District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2021 Jul;39(7):492-498. doi: 10.1089/photob.2021.0030.


DOI:10.1089/photob.2021.0030
PMID:34264766
Abstract

To investigate the noninferiority of 10.6 μm laser moxibustion (LM) to traditional moxibustion (TM) in knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Ninety-two patients were recruited and randomly placed into one of two groups: 10.6 μm LM or TM in a 1:1 ratio. Each patient received 12 sessions of LM or TM, focusing on the ST-35 and Ashi acupoint. The sessions took place over 4 weeks, three times a week, and were followed up over 8 weeks. The endpoint outcomes were separated into two categories, primary and secondary. The primary endpoint was assessed at the end of the 4-week treatment, using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain score. The secondary endpoint was evaluated at the end of the trial and consisted of the WOMAC function and stiffness score, visual analog pain [visual analog scale (VAS)] score, and 15-m walking time test. In addition, safety evaluation was performed throughout the trial. Among the 92 randomized participants, 86 (93.48%) completed the trial; 43 in each group. The WOMAC pain score improved dramatically between the LM and TM groups, with a mean difference of 20.61 [95% confidence interval (CI): -2.28 to 43.50]. Given that the lower boundary of 95% CI was greater than -18.49, noninferiority was established. In addition, both LM and TM significantly decreased the WOMAC (pain, function and stiffness) score, VAS score ( < 0.05), and the 15-m walking time at the end of the trial. Interestingly, there were not significant differences between LM and TM ( > 0.05), suggesting that both are equally effective in treating KOA. Finally, among the 92 patients, 17 (18.48%) adverse effects were documented, namely 5 (10.87%) in the LM-treated group and 11 (26.09%) in the TM-treated group. 10.6 μm LM is not inferior to TM in treating KOA. Moreover, both LM and TM dramatically alleviated knee pain and enhanced function of knees. Clinical Trial Registration number: ISRCTN registry trial identifier: 14604492.

摘要

相似文献

[1]
Comparison of 10.6 μm Laser Moxibustion with Traditional Moxibustion in Knee Osteoarthritic Therapy: A Randomized Noninferiority Clinical Trial.

Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2021-7

[2]
CO Laser Moxibustion for Knee Osteoarthritis: Study Protocol for A Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Chin J Integr Med. 2020-8

[3]
Efficacy and safety comparison of infrared laser moxibustion and traditional moxibustion in knee osteoarthritis: study protocol for a Zelen-design randomized controlled non-inferiority clinical trial.

J Orthop Surg Res. 2023-12-2

[4]
Moxibustion using different habitat moxa floss for moderate to severe primary knee osteoarthritis: study protocol for a three-armed randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled trial.

Trials. 2018-7-27

[5]
Efficacy and safety of electrical moxibustion for knee osteoarthritis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Trials. 2018-3-5

[6]
Effect of Laser Moxibustion for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Multisite, Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

J Rheumatol. 2021-6

[7]
Moxibustion treatment for knee osteoarthritis: a multi-centre, non-blinded, randomised controlled trial on the effectiveness and safety of the moxibustion treatment versus usual care in knee osteoarthritis patients.

PLoS One. 2014-7-25

[8]
Effect of 10.6-μm CO laser moxibustion on the fastest 15-m walking time in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a double-blind, sham-controlled, multi-site randomized trial.

J Orthop Surg Res. 2023-11-22

[9]
Comparison of the effects of 10.6-μm infrared laser and traditional moxibustion in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

Lasers Med Sci. 2019-8-24

[10]
[Light and heat of moxibustion for knee osteoarthritis:a multi-center randomized controlled trial].

Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2020-6-12

引用本文的文献

[1]
Therapeutic analysis of laser moxibustion for different KL graded knee osteoarthritis.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2024-6-21

[2]
Efficacy and safety comparison of infrared laser moxibustion and traditional moxibustion in knee osteoarthritis: study protocol for a Zelen-design randomized controlled non-inferiority clinical trial.

J Orthop Surg Res. 2023-12-2

[3]
A comparison of jade moxibustion and traditional moxibustion in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A randomized clinical trial.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2023-8-4

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索