Suppr超能文献

与最佳实践建议相比,渐进性运动治疗肩袖疾病患者(GRASP),联合或不联合皮质类固醇注射:一项多中心、实用、2×2 析因、随机对照试验。

Progressive exercise compared with best practice advice, with or without corticosteroid injection, for the treatment of patients with rotator cuff disorders (GRASP): a multicentre, pragmatic, 2 × 2 factorial, randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Lancet. 2021 Jul 31;398(10298):416-428. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00846-1. Epub 2021 Jul 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroid injections and physiotherapy exercise programmes are commonly used to treat rotator cuff disorders but the treatments' effectiveness is uncertain. We aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a progressive exercise programme with a single session of best practice physiotherapy advice, with or without corticosteroid injection, in adults with a rotator cuff disorder.

METHODS

In this pragmatic, multicentre, superiority, randomised controlled trial (2 × 2 factorial), we recruited patients from 20 UK National Health Service trusts. We included patients aged 18 years or older with a rotator cuff disorder (new episode within the past 6 months). Patients were excluded if they had a history of significant shoulder trauma (eg, dislocation, fracture, or full-thickness tear requiring surgery), neurological disease affecting the shoulder, other shoulder conditions (eg, inflammatory arthritis, frozen shoulder, or glenohumeral joint instability), received corticosteroid injection or physiotherapy for shoulder pain in the past 6 months, or were being considered for surgery. Patients were randomly assigned (centralised computer-generated system, 1:1:1:1) to progressive exercise (≤6 sessions), best practice advice (one session), corticosteroid injection then progressive exercise, or corticosteroid injection then best practice advice. The primary outcome was the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) score over 12 months, analysed on an intention-to-treat basis (statistical significance set at 1%). The trial was registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Register, ISRCTN16539266, and EuDRACT, 2016-002991-28.

FINDINGS

Between March 10, 2017, and May 2, 2019, we screened 2287 patients. 708 patients were randomly assigned to progressive exercise (n=174), best practice advice (n=174), corticosteroid injection then progressive exercise (n=182), or corticosteroid injection then best practice advice (n=178). Over 12 months, SPADI data were available for 166 (95%) patients in the progressive exercise group, 164 (94%) in the best practice advice group, 177 (97%) in the corticosteroid injection then progressive exercise group, and 175 (98%) in the corticosteroid injection then best practice advice group. We found no evidence of a difference in SPADI score between progressive exercise and best practice advice when analysed over 12 months (adjusted mean difference -0·66 [99% CI -4·52 to 3·20]). We also found no evidence of a difference between corticosteroid injection compared with no injection when analysed over 12 months (-1·11 [-4·47 to 2·26]). No serious adverse events were reported.

INTERPRETATION

Progressive exercise was not superior to a best practice advice session with a physiotherapist in improving shoulder pain and function. Subacromial corticosteroid injection provided no long-term benefit in patients with rotator cuff disorders.

FUNDING

UK National Institute for Health Research Technology Assessment Programme.

摘要

背景

皮质类固醇注射和物理治疗运动方案常用于治疗肩袖疾病,但这些治疗的效果并不确定。我们旨在比较渐进性运动方案与单次最佳实践物理治疗建议,以及是否联合皮质类固醇注射,在肩袖疾病的成年患者中的临床效果和成本效益。

方法

在这项务实、多中心、优势、随机对照试验(2×2 析因)中,我们从 20 个英国国家医疗服务信托机构招募了患者。我们纳入了年龄在 18 岁及以上、患有肩袖疾病(过去 6 个月内新发病例)的患者。如果患者有明显的肩部创伤史(例如脱位、骨折或需要手术的全层撕裂)、影响肩部的神经疾病、其他肩部疾病(例如炎性关节炎、冻结肩或盂肱关节不稳定)、过去 6 个月内因肩部疼痛接受过皮质类固醇注射或物理治疗,或正在考虑手术治疗,则将其排除在外。患者以 1:1:1:1 的比例随机分配(中心化计算机生成系统)至渐进性运动(≤6 次)、最佳实践建议(1 次)、皮质类固醇注射后再进行渐进性运动,或皮质类固醇注射后再进行最佳实践建议。主要结局是 12 个月时的肩痛和残疾指数(SPADI)评分,采用意向治疗分析(统计学显著性设定为 1%)。该试验在国际标准随机对照试验注册中心(ISRCTN)和欧洲药品管理局(EUDRACT)注册,注册号分别为 ISRCTN6539266 和 2016-002991-28。

结果

在 2017 年 3 月 10 日至 2019 年 5 月 2 日期间,我们对 2287 名患者进行了筛查。708 名患者被随机分配至渐进性运动组(n=174)、最佳实践建议组(n=174)、皮质类固醇注射后再进行渐进性运动组(n=182)或皮质类固醇注射后再进行最佳实践建议组(n=178)。在 12 个月时,渐进性运动组有 166 名(95%)患者、最佳实践建议组有 164 名(94%)患者、皮质类固醇注射后再进行渐进性运动组有 177 名(97%)患者、皮质类固醇注射后再进行最佳实践建议组有 175 名(98%)患者提供了 SPADI 数据。我们发现,在 12 个月时,渐进性运动与最佳实践建议在 SPADI 评分上没有差异(调整后的平均差异-0.66 [99%CI-4.52 至 3.20])。我们还发现,在 12 个月时,与不注射相比,皮质类固醇注射也没有差异(-1.11 [-4.47 至 2.26])。没有报告严重不良事件。

解释

与物理治疗师的最佳实践建议相比,渐进性运动并不能改善肩痛和功能。肩袖疾病患者的肩峰下皮质类固醇注射并不能提供长期益处。

结论

肩袖疾病患者接受皮质类固醇注射或最佳实践建议治疗后,12 个月时的肩痛和功能改善无显著差异。

资金来源

英国国家卫生研究院技术评估计划。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eef0/8343092/509404546396/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验