Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD.
Scilex Pharmaceuticals Inc., Palo Alto, CA.
Clin J Pain. 2021 Sep 1;37(9):707-717. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000963.
OBJECTIVE: Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) are a commonly utilized treatment for lumbosacral radicular pain caused by intervertebral disc herniation or stenosis. Although effective in certain patient populations, ESIs have been associated with serious complications, including paralysis and death. In 2014, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a safety warning on the risk of injecting corticosteroids into the epidural space. The aims of this article were to review the neurological complications associated with ESIs and to compare the formulations, safety, and effectiveness of commercially available corticosteroids given by transforaminal, interlaminar, or caudal injection. METHODS: Serious adverse events associated with ESIs were identified by a search of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. A MEDLINE search of the literature was conducted to identify clinical trials comparing the safety and effectiveness of nonparticulate and particulate corticosteroid formulations. RESULTS: Neurological complications with ESIs were rare and more often associated with the use of particulate corticosteroids administered by transforaminal injection. Among the 10 comparative-effectiveness studies reviewed, 7 found nonparticulate steroids had comparable efficacy to particulate steroids, and 3 studies suggested reduced efficacy or shorter duration of effect for nonparticulate steroids. DISCUSSION: The risk of complications for transforaminal ESI is greater with particulate corticosteroids. Nonparticulate corticosteroids, which are often recommended as first-line therapy, may have a short duration of effect, and many commercial formulations contain neurotoxic preservatives. The safety profile of ESIs may continue to improve with the development of safer, sterile formulations that reduce the risk of complications while maintaining efficacy.
目的:硬膜外类固醇注射(ESI)是治疗因椎间盘突出或狭窄引起的腰骶神经根痛的常用方法。尽管在某些患者群体中有效,但 ESI 与严重并发症相关,包括瘫痪和死亡。2014 年,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)就硬膜外注射皮质类固醇的风险发布了安全警告。本文的目的是回顾与 ESI 相关的神经并发症,并比较经椎间孔、椎板间或骶管注射的市售皮质类固醇的配方、安全性和有效性。
方法:通过搜索 FDA 不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库,确定与 ESI 相关的严重不良事件。对文献进行 MEDLINE 搜索,以确定比较非颗粒和颗粒皮质类固醇制剂安全性和有效性的临床试验。
结果:ESI 后的神经并发症罕见,且更常与经椎间孔注射的颗粒皮质类固醇的使用相关。在审查的 10 项比较有效性研究中,有 7 项研究发现非颗粒类固醇与颗粒类固醇具有相当的疗效,3 项研究表明非颗粒类固醇的疗效降低或作用持续时间较短。
讨论:经椎间孔 ESI 时使用颗粒皮质类固醇的并发症风险更高。非颗粒皮质类固醇通常被推荐为一线治疗药物,但可能作用持续时间较短,并且许多商业制剂含有神经毒性防腐剂。随着更安全、无菌配方的开发,ESI 的安全性状况可能会继续改善,这些配方在保持疗效的同时降低并发症风险。
Skeletal Radiol. 2023-10
N Am Spine Soc J. 2025-6-21
Interv Pain Med. 2023-11-29
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2023-6
Skeletal Radiol. 2023-10
Front Vet Sci. 2022-4-26