Suppr超能文献

在跑步机上跑步时对现役军人最大摄氧量的验证。

Verification of Maximal Oxygen Uptake in Active Military Personnel During Treadmill Running.

机构信息

Biophysics and Biomedical Modeling Division, U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine (USARIEM), Natick, Massachusetts.

Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE), Oak Ridge, Tennessee; and.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2022 Apr 1;36(4):1053-1058. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004019.

Abstract

Figueiredo, PS, Looney, DP, Pryor, JL, Doughty, EM, McClung, HL, Vangala, SV, Santee, WR, Beidleman, BA, and Potter, AW. Verification of maximal oxygen uptake in active military personnel during treadmill running. J Strength Cond Res 36(4): 1053-1058, 2022-It is unclear whether verification tests are required to confirm "true" maximal oxygen uptake (V̇o2max) in modern warfighter populations. Our study investigated the prevalence of V̇o2max attainment in U.S. Army soldiers performing a traditional incremental running test. In addition, we examined the utility of supramaximal verification testing as well as repeated trials for familiarization for accurate V̇o2max assessment. Sixteen U.S. Army soldiers (1 woman, 15 men; age, 21 ± 2 years; height, 1.73 ± 0.06 m; body mass, 71.6 ± 10.1 kg) completed 2 laboratory visits, each with an incremental running test (modified Astrand protocol) and a verification test (110% maximal incremental test speed) on a motorized treadmill. We evaluated V̇o2max attainment during incremental testing by testing for the definitive V̇O2 plateau using a linear least-squares regression approach. Peak oxygen uptake (V̇o2peak) was considered statistically equivalent between tests if the 90% confidence interval around the mean difference was within ±2.1 ml·kg-1·min-1. Oxygen uptake plateaus were identified in 14 of 16 volunteers for visit 1 (87.5%) and all 16 volunteers for visit 2 (100%). Peak oxygen uptake was not statistically equivalent, apparent from the mean difference in V̇o2peak measures between the incremental test and verification test on visit 1 (2.3 ml·kg-1·min-1, [1.3-3.2]) or visit 2 (1.1 ml·kg-1·min-1 [0.2-2.1]). Interestingly, V̇o2peak was equivalent, apparent from the mean difference in V̇o2peak measures between visits for the incremental tests (0.0 ml·kg-1·min-1 [-0.8 to 0.9]) but not the verification tests (-1.2 ml·kg-1·min-1 [-2.2 to -0.2]). Modern U.S. Army soldiers can attain V̇o2max by performing a modified Astrand treadmill running test. Additional familiarization and verification tests for confirming V̇o2max in healthy active military personnel may be unnecessary.

摘要

Figueiredo, PS, Looney, DP, Pryor, JL, Doughty, EM, McClung, HL, Vangala, SV, Santee, WR, Beidleman, BA, and Potter, AW. 对在跑步机上跑步的现役军人进行最大摄氧量的验证。J 力量与体能研究 36(4): 1053-1058, 2022-目前尚不清楚在现代作战人员群体中是否需要验证测试来确认“真实”的最大摄氧量 (V̇o2max)。我们的研究调查了美国陆军士兵在进行传统递增跑步测试时达到 V̇o2max 的流行程度。此外,我们还研究了超最大验证测试以及重复测试对准确评估 V̇o2max 的实用性。16 名美国陆军士兵(1 名女性,15 名男性;年龄,21 ± 2 岁;身高,1.73 ± 0.06 m;体重,71.6 ± 10.1 kg)在每个实验室访问中完成了 2 次测试,分别是递增跑步测试(改良的 Astrand 方案)和验证测试(110%最大递增测试速度)在电动跑步机上进行。我们通过使用线性最小二乘法回归方法测试明确的 V̇O2 平台来评估递增测试中的 V̇o2max 达成情况。如果平均差的 90%置信区间在 ±2.1 ml·kg-1·min-1 内,则认为峰值摄氧量 (V̇o2peak) 在两次测试之间具有统计学等效性。在第 1 次访问中,有 14 名志愿者(87.5%)和所有 16 名志愿者(100%)的第 2 次访问中都确定了氧气摄取平台。在第 1 次访问(2.3 ml·kg-1·min-1,[1.3-3.2])或第 2 次访问(1.1 ml·kg-1·min-1 [0.2-2.1])中,递增测试和验证测试之间的 V̇o2peak 测量值的平均差异表明 V̇o2peak 并不具有统计学等效性。有趣的是,在递增测试的访问之间,V̇o2peak 的测量值的平均差异为 0.0 ml·kg-1·min-1(-0.8 至 0.9),但在验证测试中并非如此(-1.2 ml·kg-1·min-1 [-2.2 至-0.2])。现代美国陆军士兵可以通过进行改良的 Astrand 跑步机跑步测试来达到 V̇o2max。在健康的现役军人中,可能不需要额外的熟悉和验证测试来确认 V̇o2max。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b28/8936151/b9ccca51f38b/jscr-36-1053-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验