Mauger Alexis R, Metcalfe Alan J, Taylor Lee, Castle Paul C
Endurance Research Group, School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Kent, Chatham Maritim, Keng ME4 4Ag, UK.
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2013 Dec;38(12):1211-6. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2012-0384. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
The novel self-paced, cycle-based maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O2max) test (SPV) has been shown to produce higher V̇O2max values than standard graded exercise test (GXT) protocols. This study sought to ascertain whether these observations would also be apparent in a self-paced, treadmill-based test design. Fourteen trained male runners performed a standard GXT on a motorised treadmill and a self-paced V̇O2max test on a nonmotorised treadmill in a counter-balanced design. The GXT included a plateau verification and was designed to last between 8 and 12 min. The self-paced test included 5 × 2 min stages and allowed participants to set their own running speed based on fixed increments in rating of perceived exertion. Significantly higher V̇O2max values (t[13] = 3.71, p = 0.003) were achieved in the self-paced test (64.4 ± 7.3 mL · kg(-1) · min(-1)) compared with the GXT (61.3 ± 7.3 mL · kg(-1) · min(-1)), and 13 of the 14 participants achieved the same or higher V̇O2max values in the self-paced test. Higher (p = 0.01) maximum heart rates were observed in the GXT (191 ± 10 beats · min(-1) vs. 187 ± 7 beats · min(-1)), but no differences were observed in any other recorded variables. The self-paced V̇O2max test may provide a more valid means of measuring V̇O2max than the GXT and suggests that a V̇O2 plateau during a GXT does not always signify achievement of a definitive V̇O2max. These results provide further support that self-paced V̇O2max testing produces higher values for maximal oxygen uptake.
新型的基于周期的自定节奏最大摄氧量(V̇O2max)测试(SPV)已被证明比标准分级运动测试(GXT)方案能产生更高的V̇O2max值。本研究旨在确定在基于跑步机的自定节奏测试设计中这些观察结果是否也会明显。14名受过训练的男性跑步者以平衡设计在电动跑步机上进行标准GXT,并在非电动跑步机上进行自定节奏的V̇O2max测试。GXT包括平台期验证,设计持续8至12分钟。自定节奏测试包括5个2分钟阶段,允许参与者根据感知运动用力等级的固定增量来设定自己的跑步速度。与GXT(61.3±7.3 mL·kg(-1)·min(-1))相比,自定节奏测试(64.4±7.3 mL·kg(-1)·min(-1))获得了显著更高的V̇O2max值(t[13]=3.71,p = 0.003),并且14名参与者中有13名在自定节奏测试中达到了相同或更高的V̇O2max值。在GXT中观察到更高的(p = 0.01)最大心率(191±10次·min(-1)对187±7次·min(-1)),但在任何其他记录变量中未观察到差异。自定节奏的V̇O2max测试可能比GXT提供一种更有效的测量V̇O2max的方法,并表明GXT期间的V̇O2平台期并不总是意味着达到了确定的V̇O2max。这些结果进一步支持自定节奏的V̇O2max测试能产生更高的最大摄氧量值。