Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Building 511-001, Entrance 76, plan 13, Campus US, 58183, Linköping, Sweden.
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2021 Jul 15;21(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12906-021-03372-5.
In response to the World Health Organization's recommendation, policy makers have been adopting evidence-based healthcare approach to promote the development of traditional, complementary and integrative medicine (TCIM) into Hong Kong's health system. Disseminating synopses of clinical evidence from systematic reviews or randomized trials is regarded as a potentially effective strategy to promote evidence uptake. The study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to implementing this strategy among Hong Kong Chinese medicine practitioners (CMPs).
Twenty-five CMPs aged under 45 years and trained in Hong Kong after reunification with China in 1997 were interviewed individually. Four clinical evidence synopses of randomized trials and systematic reviews on Chinese medicine interventions were presented, and CMPs were asked to comment on their applicability in routine practice. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was applied to guide interview and analysis.
The barriers included: i) CMPs' perceived difficulties in applying complex evidence in decision-making and ii) inadequate training and limited consultation time. The facilitators were i) availability of publicly accessible and user-friendly synopses, ii) formation of community of evidence-based practice among CMPs with input from key opinion leaders, iii) opportunity for interprofessional collaborations with conventional healthcare providers, and iv) patients' demand for evidence-based clinical advice. Besides, i) CMPs' knowledge and beliefs in evidence-based healthcare approach, ii) presentations of evidence-based information in the synopses, and iii) clinical decision making as influenced by quality of evidence reported acted as both barriers and facilitators.
This CFIR-based qualitative study investigated how the World Health Organization recommendation of promoting evidence use in routine practice was perceived by CMPs trained in Hong Kong after reunification with China in 1997. Key barriers and facilitators to applying evidence were identified. Such results will inform tailoring of implementation strategies for promoting evidence uptake, in the context of a well-developed health system dominated by conventional medicine.
为响应世界卫生组织的建议,政策制定者一直在采取循证医疗方法,以促进传统、补充和整合医学(TCIM)在香港卫生系统中的发展。传播系统评价或随机试验的临床证据摘要被认为是促进证据应用的潜在有效策略。本研究旨在确定在香港中医师(CMP)中实施这一策略的障碍和促进因素。
对 25 名年龄在 45 岁以下、1997 年香港回归后在中国接受培训的 CMP 进行了个体访谈。呈现了 4 篇关于中药干预的随机试验和系统评价的临床证据摘要,并要求 CMP 对其在常规实践中的适用性发表意见。应用整合实施研究框架(CFIR)指导访谈和分析。
障碍包括:i)CMP 认为在决策中应用复杂证据存在困难,ii)培训不足且咨询时间有限。促进因素包括:i)可获得公共访问和用户友好的摘要,ii)在 CMP 中形成循证实践社区,并有主要意见领袖参与,iii)与常规医疗保健提供者进行跨专业合作的机会,以及 iv)患者对循证临床建议的需求。此外,i)CMP 对循证医疗方法的知识和信念,ii)摘要中呈现的循证信息,以及 iii)报告证据质量对临床决策的影响,既是障碍也是促进因素。
本基于 CFIR 的定性研究调查了香港回归后接受培训的 CMP 如何看待世界卫生组织关于在常规实践中促进证据应用的建议。确定了应用证据的关键障碍和促进因素。这些结果将为在以常规医学为主导的发达卫生系统中,促进证据应用的实施策略的调整提供信息。