Suppr超能文献

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,人们是如何应对的?在 26016 名英国成年人中,应对策略的模式和预测因素。

How have people been coping during the COVID-19 pandemic? Patterns and predictors of coping strategies amongst 26,016 UK adults.

机构信息

Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.

出版信息

BMC Psychol. 2021 Jul 15;9(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00603-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Individuals face increased psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, it's unknown whether choice of coping styles are influenced by COVID-19 in addition to known predictors.

METHODS

Data from 26,016 UK adults in the UCL COVID-19 Social Study were analysed from 12/4/2020 15/5/2020. Regression models were used to identify predictors of coping styles (problem-focused, emotion-focused, avoidant, and socially-supported): model 1 included sociodemographic variables, model 2 additionally included psychosocial factors, and model 3 further included experience of COVID-19 specific adverse worries or events.

RESULTS

Sociodemographic and psychosocial predictors of coping align with usual predictors of coping styles not occurring during a pandemic. However, even when controlling for the wide range of these previously known predictors specific adversities were associated with use of specific strategies. Experience of worries about finances, basic needs, and events related to Covid-19 were associated with a range of strategies, while experience of financial adversities was associated with problem-focused, emotion-focused and avoidant coping. There were no associations between coping styles and experiencing challenges in meeting basic needs, but Covid-19 related adversities were associated with a lower use of socially-supported coping.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper demonstrates that there are not only demographic and social predictors of coping styles during the COVID-19 pandemic, but specific adversities are related to the ways that adults cope. Furthermore, this study identifies groups at risk of more avoidant coping mechanisms which may be targeted for supportive interventions.

摘要

背景

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,个人面临着更大的心理困扰。然而,除了已知的预测因素外,应对方式的选择是否受到 COVID-19 的影响尚不清楚。

方法

从 2020 年 12 月 4 日至 5 月 15 日,对 UCL COVID-19 社会研究中的 26016 名英国成年人的数据进行了分析。使用回归模型来确定应对方式(问题焦点型、情绪焦点型、回避型和社会支持型)的预测因素:模型 1 包括社会人口统计学变量,模型 2 另外包括心理社会因素,模型 3 进一步包括 COVID-19 特定负面担忧或事件的经历。

结果

应对方式的社会人口统计学和心理社会预测因素与大流行期间通常的应对方式预测因素一致。然而,即使控制了这些以前已知的广泛预测因素,特定的逆境仍然与特定策略的使用有关。对财务、基本需求和与 COVID-19 相关事件的担忧与多种策略相关,而财务逆境的经历与问题焦点型、情绪焦点型和回避型应对方式相关。在满足基本需求方面遇到挑战与应对方式之间没有关联,但与 COVID-19 相关的逆境与较少使用社会支持型应对方式有关。

结论

本文表明,在 COVID-19 大流行期间,不仅有应对方式的人口统计学和社会预测因素,而且特定的逆境与成年人应对的方式有关。此外,这项研究确定了面临更多回避应对机制风险的群体,这些群体可能是支持性干预的目标。

相似文献

2
Coping strategies and mental health trajectories during the first 21 weeks of COVID-19 lockdown in the United Kingdom.
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Jun;279:113958. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113958. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
3
Are adversities and worries during the COVID-19 pandemic related to sleep quality? Longitudinal analyses of 46,000 UK adults.
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 25;16(3):e0248919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248919. eCollection 2021.
4
Coping styles and mental health in response to societal changes during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2021 Aug;67(5):540-549. doi: 10.1177/0020764020961790. Epub 2020 Oct 4.
6
Emotion-focused dyadic coping styles used by family carers of people with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Dementia (London). 2023 Aug;22(6):1205-1226. doi: 10.1177/14713012231173812. Epub 2023 May 5.
10
Global vascular surgeons' experience, stressors, and coping during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Mar;73(3):762-771.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.08.030. Epub 2020 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

3
Aging and the neuropsychiatry of multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional study.
J Neurol. 2025 May 4;272(5):375. doi: 10.1007/s00415-025-13116-x.
5
Coping strategies of COVID-19 recovered patients at the Ghana Infectious Disease Centre.
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 8;20(1):e0310921. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310921. eCollection 2025.
7
Coping strategies mediated the relationship between perceived stress and hair cortisol among socioeconomically marginalized parents.
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2024 Sep 7;12(1):2399211. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2024.2399211. eCollection 2024.
10
Inspired in Adversity: How Inspiration Mediates the Effects of Emotions on Coping Strategies.
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Dec 22;16:5185-5196. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S425643. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

2
Who is lonely in lockdown? Cross-cohort analyses of predictors of loneliness before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Public Health. 2020 Sep;186:31-34. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.06.036. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
3
Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal probability sample survey of the UK population.
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;7(10):883-892. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30308-4. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
4
Are we all in this together? Longitudinal assessment of cumulative adversities by socioeconomic position in the first 3 weeks of lockdown in the UK.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Sep;74(9):683-688. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-214475. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
5
Taking control amidst the chaos: Emotion regulation during the COVID-19 pandemic.
J Vocat Behav. 2020 Jun;119:103440. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103440. Epub 2020 May 8.
6
Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science.
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;7(6):547-560. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30168-1. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
7
Redefining vulnerability in the era of COVID-19.
Lancet. 2020 Apr 4;395(10230):1089. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30757-1.
8
COVID-19 and experiences of moral injury in front-line key workers.
Occup Med (Lond). 2020 Jul 17;70(5):317-319. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqaa052.
10
Dealing With Adverse Events: A Meta-analysis on Second Victims' Coping Strategies.
J Patient Saf. 2020 Jun;16(2):e51-e60. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000661.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验