Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.
BMC Psychol. 2021 Jul 15;9(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00603-9.
Individuals face increased psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, it's unknown whether choice of coping styles are influenced by COVID-19 in addition to known predictors.
Data from 26,016 UK adults in the UCL COVID-19 Social Study were analysed from 12/4/2020 15/5/2020. Regression models were used to identify predictors of coping styles (problem-focused, emotion-focused, avoidant, and socially-supported): model 1 included sociodemographic variables, model 2 additionally included psychosocial factors, and model 3 further included experience of COVID-19 specific adverse worries or events.
Sociodemographic and psychosocial predictors of coping align with usual predictors of coping styles not occurring during a pandemic. However, even when controlling for the wide range of these previously known predictors specific adversities were associated with use of specific strategies. Experience of worries about finances, basic needs, and events related to Covid-19 were associated with a range of strategies, while experience of financial adversities was associated with problem-focused, emotion-focused and avoidant coping. There were no associations between coping styles and experiencing challenges in meeting basic needs, but Covid-19 related adversities were associated with a lower use of socially-supported coping.
This paper demonstrates that there are not only demographic and social predictors of coping styles during the COVID-19 pandemic, but specific adversities are related to the ways that adults cope. Furthermore, this study identifies groups at risk of more avoidant coping mechanisms which may be targeted for supportive interventions.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,个人面临着更大的心理困扰。然而,除了已知的预测因素外,应对方式的选择是否受到 COVID-19 的影响尚不清楚。
从 2020 年 12 月 4 日至 5 月 15 日,对 UCL COVID-19 社会研究中的 26016 名英国成年人的数据进行了分析。使用回归模型来确定应对方式(问题焦点型、情绪焦点型、回避型和社会支持型)的预测因素:模型 1 包括社会人口统计学变量,模型 2 另外包括心理社会因素,模型 3 进一步包括 COVID-19 特定负面担忧或事件的经历。
应对方式的社会人口统计学和心理社会预测因素与大流行期间通常的应对方式预测因素一致。然而,即使控制了这些以前已知的广泛预测因素,特定的逆境仍然与特定策略的使用有关。对财务、基本需求和与 COVID-19 相关事件的担忧与多种策略相关,而财务逆境的经历与问题焦点型、情绪焦点型和回避型应对方式相关。在满足基本需求方面遇到挑战与应对方式之间没有关联,但与 COVID-19 相关的逆境与较少使用社会支持型应对方式有关。
本文表明,在 COVID-19 大流行期间,不仅有应对方式的人口统计学和社会预测因素,而且特定的逆境与成年人应对的方式有关。此外,这项研究确定了面临更多回避应对机制风险的群体,这些群体可能是支持性干预的目标。