Sheng Changrui, Gao Shanshan, Yan Liming, Yin Hua, Hu Jingjing, Ye Zhiying, Wei Xiuzhi
Department of Ultrasound, Hwa Mei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, China.
Gland Surg. 2021 Jun;10(6):1980-1988. doi: 10.21037/gs-21-320.
At present, most ultrasound (US) studies on triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) are limited to conventional US features, so it is necessary to develop new joint diagnostic methods. The study aims to explore the values of conventional US and shear wave elastography (SWE) in differential diagnoses of TNBC and non-TNBC.
A total of 120 breast cancer (BC) patients involving 120 lesions that were pathologically verified were retrospectively analyzed in this study. All participants had received both conventional US and SWE before surgery. Meanwhile, the participants were divided into a TNBC group or a non-TNBC group according to their immunohistochemical (IHC) results. The differences between the conventional US features (including lesion shape, growth location, margin, boundary, internal echo, micro-calcification, posterior echo, and internal blood supply) and the SWE image features [including mean lesion hardness (Emean), maximum (Emax), minimum (Emin), standard deviation (SD), and ratio to normal gland (Eratio)] of 2 groups were compared. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the diagnosed lesion was calculated by the area under the curve (AUC).
According to the findings of conventional US, the TNBC group mostly manifested as a micro-lobulated margin, with a clear boundary and no internal micro-calcification; the non-TNBC group mainly manifested as marginal angulation or burr, and hyper-echo halo in the boundary, accompanied with internal micro-calcification, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); the internal thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) and resistance index between the TNBC group and non-TNBC group were similar, and the differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05). The findings of SWE were as follows: differences in Emax, Emean, and Eratio values between 2 groups were statistically significant (P<0.05); and the areas under the ROC curve (AUC) of these three in diagnosing the lesions were 0.811, 0.781 and 0.770, respectively.
Conventional US combined with SWE can comprehensively analyze the morphological, blood supply, and hardness features of breast lesions, and provide more reliable information for the differential diagnosis between TNBC and non-TNBC.
目前,大多数关于三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)的超声(US)研究仅限于传统超声特征,因此有必要开发新的联合诊断方法。本研究旨在探讨传统超声和剪切波弹性成像(SWE)在TNBC与非TNBC鉴别诊断中的价值。
本研究回顾性分析了120例经病理证实的乳腺癌(BC)患者的120个病灶。所有参与者在手术前均接受了传统超声和SWE检查。同时,根据免疫组织化学(IHC)结果将参与者分为TNBC组或非TNBC组。比较两组的传统超声特征(包括病灶形态、生长部位、边缘、边界、内部回声、微钙化、后方回声和内部血供)和SWE图像特征[包括病灶平均硬度(Emean)、最大值(Emax)、最小值(Emin)、标准差(SD)和与正常腺体的比值(Eratio)]。通过曲线下面积(AUC)计算诊断病灶的受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线。
根据传统超声检查结果,TNBC组大多表现为微分叶状边缘,边界清晰,无内部微钙化;非TNBC组主要表现为边缘成角或毛刺状,边界有高回声晕,伴有内部微钙化,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);TNBC组与非TNBC组的内部溶栓心肌梗死(TIMI)和阻力指数相似,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。SWE检查结果如下:两组间Emax、Emean和Eratio值差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);这三项指标诊断病灶的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.811、0.781和0.770。
传统超声联合SWE可综合分析乳腺病灶的形态、血供和硬度特征,为TNBC与非TNBC的鉴别诊断提供更可靠的信息。