Suppr超能文献

确定B超联合超声造影及剪切波弹性成像在乳腺肿块样和非肿块样病变中的诊断价值是否存在差异:一项诊断试验。

Determining whether the diagnostic value of B-ultrasound combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound and shear wave elastography in breast mass-like and non-mass-like lesions differs: a diagnostic test.

作者信息

Li Shi-Yu, Niu Rui-Lan, Wang Bo, Jiang Ying, Li Jia-Nan, Liu Gang, Wang Zhi-Li

机构信息

Department of Ultrasound, The First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

Department of Radiology, The First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Gland Surg. 2023 Feb 28;12(2):282-296. doi: 10.21037/gs-23-51. Epub 2023 Feb 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mass-like (ML) and non-mass-like (NML) are two manifestations of breast lesions on ultrasound. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can make up for the limitation of B-ultrasound (US) in the observation of focal blood flow, and shear wave elastography (SWE) can supplement the hardness information of the lesion. The present study aimed to analyze the characteristic manifestations of US, CEUS, and SWE in NML and ML breast and evaluate whether the diagnostic performance of these three ultrasound techniques differs in terms of differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions.

METHODS

From January to August 2021, 382 patients (417 breast lesions) underwent US, CEUS, and SWE examinations. Of these, 204 women (218 breast lesions) were included in our study due to subsequent biopsy or surgery with pathological findings. The patients were divided into ML and NML groups according to the ultrasound characteristics, and the differences in multimodal ultrasound performance between benign and malignant NML and benign and malignant ML breast lesions were compared. The diagnostic performance of US, US + CEUS, US + SWE, US + CEUS + SWE for ML, NML and all breast lesions was evaluated by analyzing sensitivity, specificity and area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Pathologically, the 218 lesions included 96 malignant and 122 benign breast lesions. The sensitivity and specificity of US + CEUS + SWE in all lesion groups, ML group and NML group were 92.7% and 90.2%, 95.9% and 90.3%, 91.3% and 79.3%, respectively. In all breast group, AUCs of US + CEUS, US + SWE, US + CEUS + SWE were statistically different from AUC of US (P=0.0010, 0.0001, 0.0001). In the ML group, the AUC of US + CEUS, US + SWE, US + CEUS + SWE were statistically different from that of US (P=0.0120, 0.0008, 0.0002). In the NML group, there was a statistical difference between US + SWE and US AUC (P=0.0149).

CONCLUSIONS

US, CEUS, and SWE have an important diagnostic value for benign and malignant ML and NML breast lesions. Multimodal ultrasound combined with US, CEUS, and SWE can improve the diagnostic efficacy in distinguishing between benign and malignant ML and NML lesions.

摘要

背景

团块样(ML)和非团块样(NML)是乳腺病变在超声检查中的两种表现形式。超声造影(CEUS)可以弥补B超(US)在观察局灶性血流方面的局限性,而剪切波弹性成像(SWE)可以补充病变的硬度信息。本研究旨在分析超声、CEUS和SWE在NML和ML型乳腺病变中的特征性表现,并评估这三种超声技术在鉴别乳腺良恶性病变方面的诊断性能是否存在差异。

方法

2021年1月至8月,382例患者(417个乳腺病变)接受了超声、CEUS和SWE检查。其中,204例女性(218个乳腺病变)因后续活检或手术及病理结果被纳入本研究。根据超声特征将患者分为ML组和NML组,比较NML和ML型乳腺良恶性病变之间多模态超声表现的差异。通过分析敏感度、特异度和受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)来评估超声、超声+CEUS、超声+SWE、超声+CEUS+SWE对ML、NML和所有乳腺病变的诊断性能。

结果

病理检查显示,218个病变包括96个恶性和122个良性乳腺病变。超声+CEUS+SWE在所有病变组、ML组和NML组中的敏感度和特异度分别为92.7%和90.2%、95.9%和90.3%、91.3%和79.3%。在所有乳腺组中,超声+CEUS、超声+SWE、超声+CEUS+SWE的AUC与超声的AUC在统计学上存在差异(P=0.0010、0.0001、0.0001)。在ML组中,超声+CEUS、超声+SWE、超声+CEUS+SWE的AUC与超声的AUC在统计学上存在差异(P=0.0120、0.0008、0.0002)。在NML组中,超声+SWE与超声的AUC之间存在统计学差异(P=0.0149)。

结论

超声、CEUS和SWE对ML和NML型乳腺良恶性病变具有重要的诊断价值。超声、CEUS和SWE联合的多模态超声可提高鉴别ML和NML型良恶性病变的诊断效能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1250/10005981/3b5b00cda580/gs-12-02-282-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验