Suppr超能文献

运用三种投射技术对低智商受试者的脑损伤进行鉴别。

Differentiation of brain damage among low IQ subjects with three projective techniques.

作者信息

Wagner E E, Klein I, Walter T

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 1978 Feb;42(1):49-55. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4201_7.

Abstract

Using a battery of three projective techniques (Rorschach, Hand Test, Bender-Gestalt) only slight discrimination was found between low IQ subjects classified according to the presence or absence of brain trauma (exogenous vs endogenous), while substantial discrimination was obtained between the same subjects categorized in terms of "lower" (60-74) and "higher" (75-89) FS WAIS IQ. All four groups used in this study had been first equated on sex and age. Results were interpreted as supporting the position that some sort of brain impairment underlies most or all retardation. Question was raised concerning the efficacy of projective techniques for diagnosing organicity in subjects of average or better intelligence.

摘要

使用一组三种投射技术(罗夏墨迹测验、手部测验、本德-格式塔测验),根据是否存在脑损伤(外源性与内源性)分类的低智商受试者之间仅发现了轻微的区分,而根据韦氏成人智力量表(FS WAIS)智商的“较低”(60 - 74)和“较高”(75 - 89)对相同受试者进行分类时,则获得了显著的区分。本研究中使用的所有四组受试者最初在性别和年龄上是等同的。结果被解释为支持这样一种观点,即某种脑损伤是大多数或所有智力迟钝的基础。有人对投射技术在诊断智力中等或更高的受试者的器质性方面的有效性提出了质疑。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验