Wagner E E, Klein I, Walter T
J Pers Assess. 1978 Feb;42(1):49-55. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4201_7.
Using a battery of three projective techniques (Rorschach, Hand Test, Bender-Gestalt) only slight discrimination was found between low IQ subjects classified according to the presence or absence of brain trauma (exogenous vs endogenous), while substantial discrimination was obtained between the same subjects categorized in terms of "lower" (60-74) and "higher" (75-89) FS WAIS IQ. All four groups used in this study had been first equated on sex and age. Results were interpreted as supporting the position that some sort of brain impairment underlies most or all retardation. Question was raised concerning the efficacy of projective techniques for diagnosing organicity in subjects of average or better intelligence.
使用一组三种投射技术(罗夏墨迹测验、手部测验、本德-格式塔测验),根据是否存在脑损伤(外源性与内源性)分类的低智商受试者之间仅发现了轻微的区分,而根据韦氏成人智力量表(FS WAIS)智商的“较低”(60 - 74)和“较高”(75 - 89)对相同受试者进行分类时,则获得了显著的区分。本研究中使用的所有四组受试者最初在性别和年龄上是等同的。结果被解释为支持这样一种观点,即某种脑损伤是大多数或所有智力迟钝的基础。有人对投射技术在诊断智力中等或更高的受试者的器质性方面的有效性提出了质疑。