Petersen Maria Laura, Vázquez Fernando J, Mayer Horacio F
Plastic Surgery Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, University of Buenos Aires School of Medicine, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires University Institute, Perón 4190, 1st. floor (1181), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires University Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Feb;46(1):248-254. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02449-3. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
Although the use of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis effectively reduces Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) incidence after body contouring surgery, this might increase the risk of bleeding and hematoma formation. In this scenario, the use of mechanical prophylaxis alone could be an attractive alternative. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of DVT in patients with massive weight loss undergoing body contouring surgeries in whom mechanical prophylaxis alone was indicated.
This retrospective cohort study included all patients who underwent body contouring surgery after massive weight loss between 09/01/16-12/31/19 and received solely mechanical prophylaxis of VTD. Data collected included smoking habit, body mass index, history of cancer, use of contraceptives, magnitude of weight loss, Caprini scale, American society of anesthesiology physical status (ASA-PS) classification, and type and length of procedures. An analysis of DVT events during the postoperative period up to 90 days was undertaken.
Sixty-four patients, in whom 82 BCS were performed, were included in this study. Most of them (89.1%) were female with a mean age of 47 ± 12 years. Mechanical prophylaxis methods used were elastic compression stockings, intermittent pneumatic compression boots, and early deambulation. In all cases, the average length of hospital stay was 26.3 ± 9.6 hours. Surgical times were less than 155,7 minutes in all procedures. Global incidence of DVT was 1.2% in a patient receiving mechanical prophylaxis alone. There were no bleeding complications or pulmonary embolism episodes.
In this series, DVT incidence in patients with mechanical prophylaxis alone was deemed acceptable if compared to the incidence reported in the literature. Individualization of the risk of thrombosis and bleeding in this group of patients is of paramount importance to reduce complications.
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
尽管使用药物进行血栓预防可有效降低身体塑形手术后深静脉血栓形成(DVT)的发生率,但这可能会增加出血和血肿形成的风险。在这种情况下,单独使用机械预防可能是一种有吸引力的替代方法。我们旨在评估仅接受机械预防的大量体重减轻患者在进行身体塑形手术时DVT的发生率。
这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2016年9月1日至2019年12月31日期间所有在大量体重减轻后接受身体塑形手术且仅接受VTD机械预防的患者。收集的数据包括吸烟习惯、体重指数、癌症病史、避孕药具使用情况、体重减轻幅度、卡普里尼量表、美国麻醉医师协会身体状况(ASA-PS)分类以及手术类型和时长。对术后长达90天的DVT事件进行了分析。
本研究纳入了64例患者,共进行了82例身体塑形手术。其中大多数(89.1%)为女性,平均年龄为47±12岁。使用的机械预防方法包括弹性压迫袜、间歇性气动压迫靴和早期下床活动。所有病例的平均住院时长为26.3±9.6小时。所有手术的手术时间均少于155.7分钟。仅接受机械预防的患者中DVT的总体发生率为1.2%。未发生出血并发症或肺栓塞事件。
在本系列研究中,与文献报道的发生率相比,仅接受机械预防的患者中DVT的发生率被认为是可接受的。对该组患者的血栓形成和出血风险进行个体化评估对于减少并发症至关重要。
证据级别IV:本刊要求作者为每篇文章指定证据级别。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者指南www.springer.com/00266 。