Suppr超能文献

个体对直立位的中心血压变化的反应:不同的血液动力学表型。

Individual changes of central blood pressure in response to upright posture: different hemodynamic phenotypes.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, FI-33014 Tampere University.

Department of Internal Medicine, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 2021 Dec 1;39(12):2403-2412. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002965.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Most studies about upright regulation of blood pressure have focused on orthostatic hypotension despite the diverse hemodynamic changes induced by orthostatic challenge. We investigated the effect of passive head-up tilt on aortic blood pressure.

METHODS

Noninvasive peripheral and central hemodynamics in 613 volunteers without cardiovascular morbidities or medications were examined using pulse wave analysis, whole-body impedance cardiography and heart rate variability analysis.

RESULTS

In all participants, mean aortic SBP decreased by -4 (-5 to -3) mmHg [mean (95% confidence intervals)] and DBP increased by 6 (5--6) mmHg in response to upright posture. When divided into tertiles according to the supine-to-upright change in aortic SBP, two tertiles presented with a decrease [-15 (-14 to -16) and -4 (-3 to -4) mmHg, respectively] whereas one tertile presented with an increase [+7 (7-- 8) mmHg] in aortic SBP. There were no major differences in demographic characteristics between the tertiles. In regression analysis, the strongest explanatory factors for upright changes in aortic SBP were the supine values of, and upright changes in systemic vascular resistance and cardiac output, and supine aortic SBP.

CONCLUSION

In participants without cardiovascular disease, the changes in central SBP during orthostatic challenge are not uniform. One-third presented with higher upright than supine aortic SBP with underlying differences in the regulation of systemic vascular resistance and cardiac output. These findings emphasize that resting blood pressure measurements give only limited information about the blood pressure status.

摘要

目的

尽管体位挑战会引起不同的血流动力学变化,但大多数关于血压直立调节的研究都集中在直立性低血压上。我们研究了被动头高位倾斜对主动脉血压的影响。

方法

使用脉搏波分析、全身阻抗心动图和心率变异性分析,检查了 613 名无心血管疾病或药物治疗的志愿者的非侵入性外周和中枢血液动力学。

结果

在所有参与者中,平均主动脉收缩压(SBP)在直立位时下降了-4(-5 至-3)mmHg[平均值(95%置信区间)],舒张压(DBP)增加了 6(5--6)mmHg。根据仰卧位至直立位主动脉 SBP 的变化,将所有参与者分为三个三分位数,其中两个三分位数的主动脉 SBP 下降[-15(-14 至-16)和-4(-3 至-4)mmHg],而一个三分位数的主动脉 SBP 升高[+7(7--8)mmHg]。三个三分位数之间的人口统计学特征没有显著差异。在回归分析中,直立位时主动脉 SBP 变化的最强解释因素是仰卧位时的系统血管阻力和心输出量以及主动脉 SBP 的直立位变化。

结论

在无心血管疾病的参与者中,体位挑战期间中心 SBP 的变化并不均匀。三分之一的人直立位时的主动脉 SBP 高于仰卧位,这与系统血管阻力和心输出量的调节存在差异。这些发现强调了静息血压测量仅能提供有关血压状态的有限信息。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验