Division of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiangmai, Thailand.
Northern Thai Research Group of Radiation Oncology (NTRG-RO), Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 16;16(7):e0254934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254934. eCollection 2021.
Left-sided post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) certainly precedes some radiation dose to the cardiopulmonary organs causing many side effects. To reduce the cardiopulmonary dose, we created a new option of the breathing adapted technique by using abdominal compression applied with a patient in deep inspiration phase utilizing shallow breathing. This study aimed to compare the use of abdominal compression with shallow breathing (ACSB) with the free breathing (FB) technique in the left-sided PMRT.
Twenty left-sided breast cancer patients scheduled for PMRT were enrolled. CT simulation was performed with ACSB and FB technique in each patient. All treatment plans were created on a TomoTherapy planning station. The target volume and dose, cardiopulmonary organ volume and dose were analyzed. A linear correlation between cardiopulmonary organ volumes and doses were also tested.
Regarding the target volumes and dose coverage, there were no significant differences between ACSB and FB technique. For organs at risk, using ACSB resulted in a significant decrease in mean (9.17 vs 9.81 Gy, p<0.0001) and maximum heart dose (43.79 vs 45.45 Gy, p = 0.0144) along with significant reductions in most of the evaluated volumetric parameters. LAD doses were also significantly reduced by ACSB with mean dose 19.24 vs 21.85 Gy (p = 0.0036) and the dose to 2% of the volume (D2%) 34.46 vs 37.33 Gy (p = 0.0174) for ACSB and FB technique, respectively. On the contrary, the lung dose metrics did not show any differences except the mean V5 of ipsilateral lung. The positive correlations were found between increasing the whole lung volume and mean heart dose (p = 0.05) as well as mean LAD dose (p = 0.041) reduction.
The ACSB technique significantly reduced the cardiac dose compared with the FB technique in left-sided PMRT treated by Helical TomoTherapy. Our technique is uncomplicated, well-tolerated, and can be applied in limited resource center.
左侧乳腺癌根治术后放疗(PMRT)肯定会导致心肺器官受到一些辐射剂量,从而产生许多副作用。为了降低心肺剂量,我们创建了一种新的呼吸适应技术选择,即在患者深吸气阶段使用腹部压迫,同时利用浅呼吸。本研究旨在比较左侧 PMRT 中使用腹部压迫结合浅呼吸(ACSB)与自由呼吸(FB)技术。
共纳入 20 例拟行 PMRT 的左侧乳腺癌患者。每位患者均行 ACSB 和 FB 技术的 CT 模拟。所有治疗计划均在 TomoTherapy 计划站创建。分析了靶区体积和剂量、心肺器官体积和剂量。还测试了心肺器官体积和剂量之间的线性相关性。
在靶区体积和剂量覆盖方面,ACSB 与 FB 技术之间无显著差异。对于危及器官,使用 ACSB 可显著降低平均(9.17 与 9.81 Gy,p<0.0001)和最大心脏剂量(43.79 与 45.45 Gy,p = 0.0144),同时显著降低大多数评估的体积参数。ACSB 还可显著降低 LAD 剂量,平均剂量分别为 19.24 与 21.85 Gy(p = 0.0036),体积的 2%(D2%)剂量分别为 34.46 与 37.33 Gy(p = 0.0174)。相反,除同侧肺的平均 V5 外,肺剂量指标无差异。发现随着全肺体积的增加,与平均心脏剂量(p = 0.05)以及平均 LAD 剂量(p = 0.041)降低呈正相关。
与 FB 技术相比,Helical TomoTherapy 治疗左侧 PMRT 时,ACSB 技术可显著降低心脏剂量。我们的技术不复杂,患者耐受性良好,可在资源有限的中心应用。