• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

磁共振引导激光间质热疗治疗小儿病变性癫痫后,改良阿伦尼乌斯模型是否能可靠预测组织消融面积?

Does the Modified Arrhenius Model Reliably Predict Area of Tissue Ablation After Magnetic Resonance-Guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for Pediatric Lesional Epilepsy?

机构信息

Division of Neurosurgery, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.

Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.

出版信息

Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2021 Sep 15;21(4):265-269. doi: 10.1093/ons/opab225.

DOI:10.1093/ons/opab225
PMID:34270761
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Commercial magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) systems utilize a generalized Arrhenius model to estimate the area of tissue damage based on the power and time of ablation. However, the reliability of these estimates in Vivo remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the accuracy and precision of the thermal damage estimate (TDE) calculated by commercially available MRgLITT systems using the generalized Arrhenius model.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective review of pediatric patients undergoing MRgLITT for lesional epilepsy was performed. The area of each lesion was measured on both TDE and intraoperative postablation, postcontrast T1 magnetic resonance images using ImageJ. Lesions requiring multiple ablations were excluded. The strength of the correlation between TDE and postlesioning measurements was assessed via linear regression.

RESULTS

A total of 32 lesions were identified in 19 patients. After exclusion, 13 pairs were available for analysis. Linear regression demonstrated a strong correlation between estimated and actual ablation areas (R2 = .97, P < .00001). The TDE underestimated the area of ablation by an average of 3.92% overall (standard error (SE) = 4.57%), but this varied depending on the type of pathologic tissue involved. TDE accuracy and precision were highest in tubers (n = 3), with average underestimation of 2.33% (SE = 0.33%). TDE underestimated the lesioning of the single hypothalamic hamartoma in our series by 52%. In periventricular nodular heterotopias, TDE overestimated ablation areas by an average of 13% (n = 2).

CONCLUSION

TDE reliability is variably consistent across tissue types, particularly in smaller or periventricular lesions. Further investigation is needed to understand the accuracy of this emerging minimally invasive technique.

摘要

背景

商业磁共振引导激光间质热疗(MRgLITT)系统利用广义阿仑尼乌斯模型根据消融的功率和时间来估计组织损伤的面积。然而,这些估计在体内的可靠性尚不清楚。

目的

确定商业上可用的 MRgLITT 系统使用广义阿仑尼乌斯模型计算的热损伤估计(TDE)的准确性和精密度。

方法

对接受 MRgLITT 治疗病变性癫痫的儿科患者进行单中心回顾性研究。使用 ImageJ 在 TDE 和术中消融后、对比后 T1 磁共振图像上测量每个病变的面积。排除需要多次消融的病变。通过线性回归评估 TDE 与病变后测量值之间的相关性强度。

结果

共确定了 19 名患者的 32 个病变。排除后,有 13 对可供分析。线性回归显示,估计和实际消融面积之间存在很强的相关性(R2=0.97,P<0.00001)。总体而言,TDE 低估了消融面积平均 3.92%(标准误差(SE)=4.57%),但这取决于所涉及的病理组织类型。TDE 在结节(n=3)中的准确性和精密度最高,平均低估了 2.33%(SE=0.33%)。在我们的系列中,TDE 低估了单个下丘脑错构瘤的消融面积 52%。在室周结节性异位中,TDE 平均高估了消融面积 13%(n=2)。

结论

TDE 的可靠性在组织类型之间存在差异,特别是在较小或室周病变中。需要进一步研究来了解这种新兴的微创技术的准确性。

相似文献

1
Does the Modified Arrhenius Model Reliably Predict Area of Tissue Ablation After Magnetic Resonance-Guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for Pediatric Lesional Epilepsy?磁共振引导激光间质热疗治疗小儿病变性癫痫后,改良阿伦尼乌斯模型是否能可靠预测组织消融面积?
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2021 Sep 15;21(4):265-269. doi: 10.1093/ons/opab225.
2
Does the Thermal Damage Estimate Correlate With the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicted Ablation Size After Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy?激光间质热疗后热损伤估计与磁共振成像预测消融体积是否相关?
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2018 Aug 1;15(2):179-183. doi: 10.1093/ons/opx191.
3
Effects of Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Thermal Imaging Signal Artifact During Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy on Thermal Damage Estimate and Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ablative Area Concordance.激光间质热疗术中磁共振热成像信号伪影对热损伤估计及术后磁共振成像消融区域一致性的影响
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2020 May 1;18(5):524-530. doi: 10.1093/ons/opz182.
4
Early outcomes of stereoelectroencephalography followed by MR-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy: a paradigm for minimally invasive epilepsy surgery.立体定向脑电图引导下磁共振引导激光间质热疗的早期结果:微创癫痫手术的范例。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Sep;45(3):E8. doi: 10.3171/2018.6.FOCUS18209.
5
Mathematical Modeling of Thermal Damage Estimate Volumes in MR-guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy.基于磁共振引导激光间质热疗的热损伤预估体积的数学建模。
J Neuroimaging. 2021 Mar;31(2):334-340. doi: 10.1111/jon.12830. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
6
Understanding the Relationship Between Real-Time Thermal Imaging and Thermal Damage Estimate During Magnetic Resonance-Guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy.理解磁共振引导激光间质热疗过程中实时热成像与热损伤预估之间的关系。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Feb;134:e1093-e1098. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.11.110. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
7
Does the real-time thermal damage estimate allow for estimation of tumor control after MRI-guided laser-induced thermal therapy? Initial experience with recurrent intracranial ependymomas.实时热损伤评估能否用于估计MRI引导下激光诱导热疗后的肿瘤控制情况?复发性颅内室管膜瘤的初步经验。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015 Apr;15(4):363-71. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.PEDS13698. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
8
Ablation dynamics of subsequent thermal doses delivered to previously heat-damaged tissue during magnetic resonance-guided laser-induced thermal therapy.磁共振引导激光诱导热疗中多次热剂量对先前受热损伤组织的消融动力学。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Dec 21;131(6):1958-1965. doi: 10.3171/2018.7.JNS18886. Print 2019 Dec 1.
9
MR-Guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for Medically Refractory Lesional Epilepsy in Pediatric Patients: Experience and Outcomes.磁共振引导激光间质热疗治疗小儿药物难治性病灶性癫痫:经验与结果
Pediatr Neurosurg. 2018;53(5):322-329. doi: 10.1159/000491823. Epub 2018 Aug 15.
10
Ablation dynamics during laser interstitial thermal therapy for mesiotemporal epilepsy.激光间质热疗治疗颞叶内侧癫痫的消融动力学。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 6;13(7):e0199190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199190. eCollection 2018.