• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测亚急性和慢性卒中患者接受机器人辅助上肢康复治疗后临床上的显著改善情况。

Predicting Clinically Significant Improvement After Robot-Assisted Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Subacute and Chronic Stroke.

作者信息

Lee Jae Joon, Shin Joon-Ho

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Seoul, South Korea.

Translational Research Center for Rehabilitation Robots, National Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2021 Jul 1;12:668923. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.668923. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fneur.2021.668923
PMID:34276535
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8281036/
Abstract

Prior studies examining predictors of favorable clinical outcomes after upper limb robot-assisted therapy (RT) have many shortcomings. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify meaningful predictors and a prediction model for clinically significant motor improvement in upper limb impairment after RT for each stroke phase. This retrospective, single-center study enrolled patients with stroke who received RT using InMotion2 along with conventional therapy (CT) from January 2015 to September 2019. Demographic characteristics, clinical measures, and robotic kinematic measures were evaluated. The primary outcome measure was the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) and we classified patients with improvement more than the minimal clinically important difference as responders for each stroke phase. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the relationship between potential predictors and RT responders and determine meaningful predictors. Subsequently, meaningful predictors were included in the final prediction model. One hundred forty-four patients were enrolled. The Hand Movement Scale and time since onset were significant predictors of clinically significant improvement in upper limb impairment ( = 0.045 and 0.043, respectively), as represented by the FMA-UE score after RT along with CT, in patients with subacute stroke. These variables were also meaningful predictors with borderline statistical significance in patients with chronic stroke ( = 0.076 and 0.066, respectively). Better hand movement and a shorter time since onset can be used as realistic predictors of clinically significant motor improvement in upper limb impairment after RT with InMotion2 alongside CT in patients with subacute and chronic stroke. This information may help healthcare professionals discern optimal patients for RT and accurately inform patients and caregivers about outcomes of RT.

摘要

先前关于上肢机器人辅助治疗(RT)后良好临床结局预测因素的研究存在诸多不足。因此,本研究的目的是为每个卒中阶段上肢功能障碍经RT治疗后临床上显著的运动改善确定有意义的预测因素和预测模型。这项回顾性单中心研究纳入了2015年1月至2019年9月期间接受InMotion2机器人辅助治疗及传统治疗(CT)的卒中患者。评估了患者的人口统计学特征、临床指标和机器人运动学指标。主要结局指标是Fugl-Meyer上肢评估量表(FMA-UE),我们将每个卒中阶段改善超过最小临床重要差异的患者分类为反应者。进行单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析,以评估潜在预测因素与RT反应者之间的关系,并确定有意义的预测因素。随后,将有意义的预测因素纳入最终预测模型。共纳入144例患者。对于亚急性卒中患者,手部运动量表和发病时间是上肢功能障碍临床显著改善的重要预测因素(分别为 = 0.045和0.043),以RT联合CT治疗后的FMA-UE评分表示。在慢性卒中患者中,这些变量也是具有临界统计学意义的有意义预测因素(分别为 = 0.076和0.066)。更好的手部运动和更短的发病时间可作为亚急性和慢性卒中患者在InMotion2机器人辅助治疗联合CT后上肢功能障碍临床显著运动改善的实际预测因素。这些信息可能有助于医疗保健专业人员识别适合RT治疗的最佳患者,并准确告知患者及其护理人员RT治疗的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e0d/8281036/c32311334943/fneur-12-668923-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e0d/8281036/4543fac65293/fneur-12-668923-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e0d/8281036/e104ec5eb53c/fneur-12-668923-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e0d/8281036/c32311334943/fneur-12-668923-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e0d/8281036/4543fac65293/fneur-12-668923-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e0d/8281036/e104ec5eb53c/fneur-12-668923-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e0d/8281036/c32311334943/fneur-12-668923-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting Clinically Significant Improvement After Robot-Assisted Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Subacute and Chronic Stroke.预测亚急性和慢性卒中患者接受机器人辅助上肢康复治疗后临床上的显著改善情况。
Front Neurol. 2021 Jul 1;12:668923. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.668923. eCollection 2021.
2
Predictors of activities of daily living outcomes after upper limb robot-assisted therapy in subacute stroke patients.上肢机器人辅助治疗亚急性期脑卒中患者日常生活活动能力结局的预测因素。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 21;13(2):e0193235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193235. eCollection 2018.
3
Proximal Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scores Predict Clinically Important Upper Limb Improvement After 3 Stroke Rehabilitative Interventions.近端Fugl-Meyer评估分数可预测三种中风康复干预后临床上上肢功能的重要改善情况。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Dec;96(12):2137-44. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.07.019. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
4
Clinical Prediction Rule for Identifying the Stroke Patients who will Obtain Clinically Important Improvement of Upper Limb Motor Function by Robot-Assisted Upper Limb.机器人辅助上肢治疗后上肢运动功能有临床意义改善的脑卒中患者的临床预测规则
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022 Jul;31(7):106517. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106517. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
5
Can robot-based measurements improve prediction of motor performance after robot-assisted upper-limb rehabilitation in patients with moderate-to-severe sub-acute stroke?基于机器人的测量能否改善中重度亚急性卒中患者在机器人辅助上肢康复后的运动表现预测?
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2019;37(2):119-129. doi: 10.3233/RNN-180892.
6
Neurocognitive robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function: a randomized control trial on motor recovery in subacute stroke.神经认知机器人辅助手部功能康复:亚急性期脑卒中运动功能恢复的随机对照试验。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Aug 24;17(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00746-7.
7
Predicting clinically significant changes in motor and functional outcomes after robot-assisted stroke rehabilitation.预测机器人辅助脑卒中康复后运动和功能结局的临床显著变化。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Feb;95(2):316-21. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.09.018. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
8
Robot-Assisted Bimanual Training Improves Hand Function in Patients With Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.机器人辅助双手训练改善亚急性中风患者的手部功能:一项随机对照试验性研究。
Front Neurol. 2022 Jul 6;13:884261. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.884261. eCollection 2022.
9
Comparison of exercise training effect with different robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation: a retrospective study.不同机器人设备用于上肢康复的运动训练效果比较:一项回顾性研究
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Apr;53(2):240-248. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.16.04297-0. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
10
A comparison of the effects and usability of two exoskeletal robots with and without robotic actuation for upper extremity rehabilitation among patients with stroke: a single-blinded randomised controlled pilot study.两种带和不带机器人驱动的外骨骼机器人在上肢康复中对脑卒中患者的效果和可用性的比较:一项单盲随机对照初步研究。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Oct 19;17(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00763-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting upper limb motor dysfunction after ischemic stroke: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy-based nomogram model.预测缺血性中风后上肢运动功能障碍:基于功能近红外光谱的列线图模型
Front Neurol. 2025 May 27;16:1524851. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1524851. eCollection 2025.
2
A Pneumatic Soft Glove System Based on Bidirectional Bending Functionality for Rehabilitation.一种基于双向弯曲功能的用于康复的气动软手套系统。
Biomimetics (Basel). 2025 Feb 21;10(3):129. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics10030129.
3
Predicting upper limb motor recovery in subacute stroke patients via fNIRS-measured cerebral functional responses induced by robotic training.

本文引用的文献

1
Key components of mechanical work predict outcomes in robotic stroke therapy.机械工作的关键组件可预测机器人中风治疗的结果。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Apr 21;17(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00672-8.
2
Prediction Tools for Stroke Rehabilitation.中风康复的预测工具
Stroke. 2019 Nov;50(11):3314-3322. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025696. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
3
Can robot-based measurements improve prediction of motor performance after robot-assisted upper-limb rehabilitation in patients with moderate-to-severe sub-acute stroke?
通过功能近红外光谱测量机器人训练诱发的大脑功能反应预测亚急性中风患者的上肢运动恢复情况。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024 Dec 23;21(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01523-6.
4
Brain-computer interface on wrist training with or without neurofeedback in subacute stroke: a study protocol for a double-blinded, randomized control pilot trial.亚急性卒中患者手腕脑机接口训练加或不加神经反馈:一项双盲随机对照试验的研究方案
Front Neurol. 2024 Jul 31;15:1376782. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1376782. eCollection 2024.
5
Combining soft robotics and telerehabilitation for improving motor function after stroke.结合软机器人技术与远程康复以改善中风后的运动功能。
Wearable Technol. 2024 Jan 26;5:e1. doi: 10.1017/wtc.2023.26. eCollection 2024.
6
Effects of an assist-as-needed equipped Tenodesis-Induced-Grip Exoskeleton Robot (TIGER) on upper limb function in patients with chronic stroke.按需辅助的经皮神经电刺激诱发握力康复外骨骼机器人(TIGER)对慢性脑卒中患者上肢功能的影响。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024 Jan 3;21(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01298-2.
7
Neurophysiological underpinnings of an intensive protocol for upper limb motor recovery in subacute and chronic stroke patients.神经生理学基础:亚急性和慢性脑卒中患者上肢运动康复强化方案。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024 Feb;60(1):13-26. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.23.07922-4. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
8
Machine learning in predicting outcomes for stroke patients following rehabilitation treatment: A systematic review.机器学习在预测康复治疗后中风患者结局中的应用:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 28;18(6):e0287308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287308. eCollection 2023.
9
Distinguishing Distinct Neural Systems for Proximal vs Distal Upper Extremity Motor Control After Acute Stroke.急性脑卒中后区分近端与远端上肢运动控制的不同神经机制。
Neurology. 2023 Jul 25;101(4):e347-e357. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207417. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
10
Predictors for Upper-Limb Functional Recovery Trajectory in Individuals Receiving Stroke Rehabilitation: A Secondary Analysis of Data from Randomized Controlled Trials.接受脑卒中康复治疗的个体上肢功能恢复轨迹的预测因素:来自随机对照试验数据的二次分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 8;19(24):16514. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416514.
基于机器人的测量能否改善中重度亚急性卒中患者在机器人辅助上肢康复后的运动表现预测?
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2019;37(2):119-129. doi: 10.3233/RNN-180892.
4
Is Unilateral Spatial Neglect Associated With Motor Recovery of the Affected Upper Extremity Poststroke? A Systematic Review.单侧空间忽略与脑卒中后患侧上肢运动功能恢复有关吗?系统评价。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2019 Mar;33(3):179-187. doi: 10.1177/1545968319832606. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
5
Systematic Review on Kinematic Assessments of Upper Limb Movements After Stroke.系统评价脑卒中后上肢运动的运动学评估。
Stroke. 2019 Mar;50(3):718-727. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023531.
6
Language as a Predictor of Motor Recovery: The Case for a More Global Approach to Stroke Rehabilitation.语言作为运动康复的预测因素:更全面的中风康复方法。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2019 Mar;33(3):167-178. doi: 10.1177/1545968319829454. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
7
Predictors of activities of daily living outcomes after upper limb robot-assisted therapy in subacute stroke patients.上肢机器人辅助治疗亚急性期脑卒中患者日常生活活动能力结局的预测因素。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 21;13(2):e0193235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193235. eCollection 2018.
8
Combining Upper Limb Robotic Rehabilitation with Other Therapeutic Approaches after Stroke: Current Status, Rationale, and Challenges.上肢机器人康复与中风后其他治疗方法相结合:现状、原理和挑战。
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:8905637. doi: 10.1155/2017/8905637. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
9
Agreed definitions and a shared vision for new standards in stroke recovery research: The Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable taskforce.达成关于卒中康复研究新标准的共识定义和共同愿景:卒中康复和康复圆桌会议工作组。
Int J Stroke. 2017 Jul;12(5):444-450. doi: 10.1177/1747493017711816.
10
Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy for the Upper Limb After Stroke.机器人辅助治疗对中风后上肢的影响。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017 Feb;31(2):107-121. doi: 10.1177/1545968316666957. Epub 2016 Sep 24.