Cardiff and Vale University Cardiff UK.
Department of Medicine Solna Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden.
Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2021 May 15;4(3):e00259. doi: 10.1002/edm2.259. eCollection 2021 Jul.
Cardiovascular (CV) effects of once-weekly subcutaneous (s.c.) semaglutide 0.5 and 1 mg and dulaglutide 1.5 mg are reported in their respective placebo-controlled cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs), SUSTAIN 6 and REWIND. There is no head-to-head CVOT comparing these treatments and heterogeneity between their CVOTs renders conventional indirect comparison inappropriate. Therefore, a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was performed to compare the effects of s.c. semaglutide and dulaglutide on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with and without established cardiovascular disease (CVD).
Individual patient data from SUSTAIN 6 were matched with aggregate data from REWIND, using a propensity score method to balance baseline effect-modifying patient characteristics. Hazard ratios (HRs) for three-point (3P) MACE (CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke), anchored via placebo, were then indirectly compared between balanced populations. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the main analysis.
After matching, included effect modifiers were balanced. In the main analysis, s.c. semaglutide was associated with a statistically significant 35% reduction in 3P MACE versus placebo (HR, 0.65 [95% confidence interval [CI]; 0.48, 0.87]) and nonsignificantly greater reduction (26%) versus dulaglutide (HR, 0.74 [95% CI; 0.54, 1.01]). Results were supported by all sensitivity analyses.
This study demonstrated a statistically significant lower risk of 3P MACE for s.c. semaglutide versus placebo, in a population with lower prevalence of pre-existing CVD than that in the pre-specified primary analysis in SUSTAIN 6. Reduction in 3P MACE with s.c. semaglutide was greater than with dulaglutide, although not statistically significant.
每周皮下注射(皮下)一次司美格鲁肽 0.5 和 1 毫克和度拉鲁肽 1.5 毫克的心血管(CV)效应在各自的安慰剂对照心血管结局试验(CVOT)中得到了报道,即 SUSTAIN 6 和 REWIND。没有头对头的 CVOT 比较这些治疗方法,而且它们的 CVOT 之间存在异质性,使得传统的间接比较不合适。因此,进行了匹配调整的间接比较(MAIC),以比较皮下注射司美格鲁肽和度拉鲁肽对有和无已确诊心血管疾病(CVD)患者主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的影响。
使用倾向评分法,从 SUSTAIN 6 的个体患者数据与 REWIND 的汇总数据进行匹配,以平衡基线时改变疗效的患者特征。然后通过安慰剂间接比较平衡人群中三个点(3P)MACE(CV 死亡、非致死性心肌梗死、非致死性卒中)的风险比(HR)。进行敏感性分析以检验主要分析的稳健性。
匹配后,包括的效应修饰符得到平衡。在主要分析中,与安慰剂相比,皮下注射司美格鲁肽与 3P MACE 降低 35%相关(HR,0.65[95%置信区间[CI];0.48,0.87]),与度拉鲁肽相比(HR,0.74[95%CI;0.54,1.01])差异无统计学意义。所有敏感性分析均支持结果。
本研究表明,在 SUSTAIN 6 的预先指定的主要分析中 CVD 发生率低于人群中,与安慰剂相比,皮下注射司美格鲁肽降低 3P MACE 的风险具有统计学意义。皮下注射司美格鲁肽降低 3P MACE 的效果大于度拉鲁肽,尽管无统计学意义。