Suppr超能文献

在有或无已确立心血管疾病的 2 型糖尿病患者中,每周一次皮下注射司美格鲁肽和度拉糖肽的心血管获益的人群调整间接比较。

A population-adjusted indirect comparison of cardiovascular benefits of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide and dulaglutide in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes, with or without established cardiovascular disease.

机构信息

Cardiff and Vale University Cardiff UK.

Department of Medicine Solna Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden.

出版信息

Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2021 May 15;4(3):e00259. doi: 10.1002/edm2.259. eCollection 2021 Jul.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular (CV) effects of once-weekly subcutaneous (s.c.) semaglutide 0.5 and 1 mg and dulaglutide 1.5 mg are reported in their respective placebo-controlled cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs), SUSTAIN 6 and REWIND. There is no head-to-head CVOT comparing these treatments and heterogeneity between their CVOTs renders conventional indirect comparison inappropriate. Therefore, a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was performed to compare the effects of s.c. semaglutide and dulaglutide on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with and without established cardiovascular disease (CVD).

METHODS

Individual patient data from SUSTAIN 6 were matched with aggregate data from REWIND, using a propensity score method to balance baseline effect-modifying patient characteristics. Hazard ratios (HRs) for three-point (3P) MACE (CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke), anchored via placebo, were then indirectly compared between balanced populations. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the main analysis.

RESULTS

After matching, included effect modifiers were balanced. In the main analysis, s.c. semaglutide was associated with a statistically significant 35% reduction in 3P MACE versus placebo (HR, 0.65 [95% confidence interval [CI]; 0.48, 0.87]) and nonsignificantly greater reduction (26%) versus dulaglutide (HR, 0.74 [95% CI; 0.54, 1.01]). Results were supported by all sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated a statistically significant lower risk of 3P MACE for s.c. semaglutide versus placebo, in a population with lower prevalence of pre-existing CVD than that in the pre-specified primary analysis in SUSTAIN 6. Reduction in 3P MACE with s.c. semaglutide was greater than with dulaglutide, although not statistically significant.

摘要

简介

每周皮下注射(皮下)一次司美格鲁肽 0.5 和 1 毫克和度拉鲁肽 1.5 毫克的心血管(CV)效应在各自的安慰剂对照心血管结局试验(CVOT)中得到了报道,即 SUSTAIN 6 和 REWIND。没有头对头的 CVOT 比较这些治疗方法,而且它们的 CVOT 之间存在异质性,使得传统的间接比较不合适。因此,进行了匹配调整的间接比较(MAIC),以比较皮下注射司美格鲁肽和度拉鲁肽对有和无已确诊心血管疾病(CVD)患者主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的影响。

方法

使用倾向评分法,从 SUSTAIN 6 的个体患者数据与 REWIND 的汇总数据进行匹配,以平衡基线时改变疗效的患者特征。然后通过安慰剂间接比较平衡人群中三个点(3P)MACE(CV 死亡、非致死性心肌梗死、非致死性卒中)的风险比(HR)。进行敏感性分析以检验主要分析的稳健性。

结果

匹配后,包括的效应修饰符得到平衡。在主要分析中,与安慰剂相比,皮下注射司美格鲁肽与 3P MACE 降低 35%相关(HR,0.65[95%置信区间[CI];0.48,0.87]),与度拉鲁肽相比(HR,0.74[95%CI;0.54,1.01])差异无统计学意义。所有敏感性分析均支持结果。

结论

本研究表明,在 SUSTAIN 6 的预先指定的主要分析中 CVD 发生率低于人群中,与安慰剂相比,皮下注射司美格鲁肽降低 3P MACE 的风险具有统计学意义。皮下注射司美格鲁肽降低 3P MACE 的效果大于度拉鲁肽,尽管无统计学意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86f3/8279621/7490ba3a8ec6/EDM2-4-e00259-g003.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验