O'Connor Anna, Waters Martha, England Laura, Milling Ashli, Kay Hazel
University of Liverpool, GB.
Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, GB.
Br Ir Orthopt J. 2021 Apr 9;17(1):70-78. doi: 10.22599/bioj.172. eCollection 2021.
A new amblyopia tracker app has been designed to provide parents with a method of monitoring a child's vision by presenting a single optotype size that the tester moves to identify the furthest distance the optotypes can be seen. The aim of this study is to evaluate this methodology in adults, comparing the findings to visual acuity (VA) measured with the iSight app and to determine the test retest variability.
Adults, aged 18-39 years, with no known eye condition and VA ≤ 0.7 logMAR were recruited. Bangerter filters were used to simulate amblyopia, where VA was reduced below 0.0 with an interocular difference of at least 0.2 logMAR. Testing for both apps was performed monocularly, with the test order being randomised.
Data from 32 subjects were analysed. For the test retest variability analysis, paired t-tests showed no statistically significant difference between the tests for either eye, either app or the interocular acuity difference (p > 0.3 in all cases). Bland Altman plots showed similar limits of agreement between the two apps. When comparing measurements between the apps there was no statistically significant difference on the first or second test, either eye or the interocular acuity difference (p > 0.5 in all cases).
The results support the theory that changing distance is a valid method of assessing VA as the measurements agree well with the standard approach of reducing optotype size. Test retest variability is similar between the two apps and there is good agreement between the measurements.
设计了一种新的弱视追踪应用程序,通过呈现单个视标大小,让测试者移动视标以确定视标能被看到的最远 距离,从而为家长提供一种监测孩子视力的方法。本研究的目的是在成年人中评估这种方法,将结果与使用iSight应用程序测量的视力(VA)进行比较,并确定测试-再测试的变异性。
招募年龄在18 - 39岁之间、无已知眼部疾病且VA≤0.7 logMAR的成年人。使用Bangerter滤光片模拟弱视,使视力降低至0.0以下,双眼视力差异至少为0.2 logMAR。两个应用程序的测试均单眼进行,测试顺序随机。
分析了32名受试者的数据。对于测试-再测试变异性分析,配对t检验显示,无论是哪只眼睛、哪个应用程序或双眼视力差异,两次测试之间均无统计学显著差异(所有情况下p>0.3)。Bland Altman图显示两个应用程序之间的一致性界限相似。比较两个应用程序的测量结果时,在第一次或第二次测试中,无论是哪只眼睛或双眼视力差异,均无统计学显著差异(所有情况下p>0.5)。
结果支持这样一种理论,即改变距离是评估视力的一种有效方法,因为测量结果与减小视标大小的标准方法吻合良好。两个应用程序的测试-再测试变异性相似,测量结果之间具有良好的一致性。