Animal Husbandry in the Tropics and Subtropics, University of Kassel and Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Witzenhausen, Germany.
Nutrition and Rangeland Management in the Tropics and Subtropics, Institute of Agricultural Sciences in the Tropics (Hans-Ruthenberg Institute), University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2022 Jul;106(4):721-732. doi: 10.1111/jpn.13597. Epub 2021 Jul 18.
In arid and semi-arid environments, extensively managed ruminants regularly experience drinking water shortage, especially in the dry season. The present study therefore investigated the effects of mild drinking water restriction on feed intake, feed digestibility, solid digesta passage and composition of faeces including faecal microbial biomass. A feeding trial was conducted in Oman, during the dry summer months. Nine adult male Batinah goats were subjected to three watering regimes in a 3 × 3 Latin Square design. Treatments were (1) water offered ad libitum (100%, W100); (2) water restricted to 85% ad libitum consumption (W85); and (3) water restricted to 70% ad libitum consumption (W70). Animals were offered Rhodes grass hay and whole barley grains (1:1 ratio) at 1.3 times maintenance energy requirements. Each of the three experimental periods comprised 16 days of adaptation and 8 days of measurements. During the latter, feed offered and refused as well as faeces were sampled and quantified. Gastrointestinal digesta passage was determined using ytterbium-labelled Rhodes grass hay. Ergosterol and amino sugars were used as markers for faecal microbial biomass, that is the sum of fungi and bacteria. Water restriction had no effect on feed intake and digesta passage. However, feed dry matter, organic matter and fibre digestibility increased (p < 0.05) in W70 compared with W85, and the excreted amount of faecal dry matter, organic matter, nitrogen and neutral detergent fibre decreased (p < 0.05) in W70 compared with W85. Even though water restriction did not affect total faecal microbial biomass carbon (C) concentration, that of fungal biomass C increased (p < 0.05) in W70 compared with W85. Therefore, mild water restriction seems unproblematic from a physiological and nutrient utilization perspective as it increases feed digestibility without compromising feed intake.
在干旱和半干旱环境中,经过大量管理的反刍动物经常会经历饮用水短缺的问题,尤其是在旱季。因此,本研究旨在调查轻度饮水限制对采食量、饲料消化率、固体粪便通过和粪便组成(包括粪便微生物生物量)的影响。该试验在阿曼进行,处于干燥的夏季月份。9 只成年雄性巴廷哈山羊采用 3×3 拉丁方设计进行三种供水方案处理。处理方案分别为:(1)自由饮水(100%,W100);(2)限制饮水至自由采食量的 85%(W85);(3)限制饮水至自由采食量的 70%(W70)。动物们按照维持能量需求的 1.3 倍,投喂罗兹草干草和全大麦粒(1:1 比例)。三个试验期的每一个都包含 16 天的适应期和 8 天的测量期。在此期间,采集和定量分析了投喂的饲料、剩余饲料和粪便。利用标记的罗兹草干草确定胃肠道消化物通过。麦角固醇和氨基糖被用作粪便微生物生物量(真菌和细菌的总和)的标记物。饮水限制对采食量和消化物通过没有影响。然而,与 W85 相比,W70 组的饲料干物质、有机物和纤维消化率增加(p<0.05),并且 W70 组的粪便干物质、有机物、氮和中性洗涤剂纤维的排泄量减少(p<0.05)。尽管饮水限制并没有影响粪便微生物生物量总碳(C)浓度,但 W70 组真菌生物量 C 的浓度增加(p<0.05)。因此,从生理学和养分利用的角度来看,轻度饮水限制似乎没有问题,因为它增加了饲料消化率,而不会影响采食量。