Pharmacology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
SSD Clinical Pharmacology, IRCSS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2021 Nov;20(11):1421-1431. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2021.1956461. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
BackgroundTo investigate the adverse event (AE) profile of tedizolid and linezolid in post-marketing surveillance.Research design and methodsWe queried the worldwide FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and selected all records where tedizolid and linezolid were reported as suspect by removing potential duplicates. Disproportionality analysis was performed investigating designated medical events (DMEs) and specific AEs of clinical interest reported with tedizolid. The reporting odds ratios (RORs) were calculated, deemed significant by a lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (LL95%CI)>1, using linezolid as comparator. Case-by-case assessment of AEs reported in at least three cases with tedizolid was performed.ResultsOverall, 271 and 11,259 reports mentioning respectively tedizolid and linezolid were recorded, of which respectively 59 and 4,473 patients with DMEs or selected AEs were found. No difference emerged for the selected AEs except for increased reporting of (N = 3; LL95%CI = 1.06) with tedizolid considering reports collected after 2014. Extensive off-label use in terms of therapeutic indications (83.6%) and treatment duration was reported with tedizolid.ConclusionsSimilar AE reporting between the two oxazolidinones was found. Considering limitations of pharmacovigilance, this hypothesis of comparable safety profile should be tested prospectively through dedicated real-world studies.
研究替加环素和利奈唑胺在上市后监测中的不良事件(AE)概况。
我们查询了全球 FDA 不良事件报告系统,并通过去除潜在重复项,选择了所有报告中将替加环素和利奈唑胺报告为可疑药物的记录。通过调查指定的医疗事件(DMEs)和具有临床意义的特定 AE 进行了替加环素的比例失衡分析。使用利奈唑胺作为对照,计算报告比值比(ROR),置信区间下限(LL95%CI)> 1 被认为具有统计学意义。对至少有 3 例报告替加环素的 AE 进行了逐例评估。
总共记录了 271 份和 11259 份分别提及替加环素和利奈唑胺的报告,其中分别有 59 名和 4473 名患者有 DMEs 或选定的 AE。除了在考虑 2014 年以后收集的报告时,替加环素报告的增加外(N=3;LL95%CI=1.06),其他选定的 AE 没有差异。替加环素的治疗适应症(83.6%)和治疗持续时间的广泛超说明书使用。
在两种恶唑烷酮类药物之间发现了相似的 AE 报告。考虑到药物警戒的局限性,应通过专门的真实世界研究前瞻性地检验这一安全性相似的假设。