I-BioStat, Data Science Institute, Hasselt University, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium.
Delft Center for Systems and Control, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands.
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jul 2;21(13):4558. doi: 10.3390/s21134558.
The lateral line organ of fish has inspired engineers to develop flow sensor arrays-dubbed artificial lateral lines (ALLs)-capable of detecting near-field hydrodynamic events for obstacle avoidance and object detection. In this paper, we present a comprehensive review and comparison of ten localisation algorithms for ALLs. Differences in the studied domain, sensor sensitivity axes, and available data prevent a fair comparison between these algorithms from their original works. We compare them with our novel quadrature method (QM), which is based on a geometric property specific to 2D-sensitive ALLs. We show how the area in which each algorithm can accurately determine the position and orientation of a simulated dipole source is affected by (1) the amount of training and optimisation data, and (2) the sensitivity axes of the sensors. Overall, we find that each algorithm benefits from 2D-sensitive sensors, with alternating sensitivity axes as the second-best configuration. From the machine learning approaches, an MLP required an impractically large training set to approach the optimisation-based algorithms' performance. Regardless of the data set size, QM performs best with both a large area for accurate predictions and a small tail of large errors.
鱼类的侧线器官启发工程师开发了流量传感器阵列——被称为人工侧线(ALLs)——能够检测近场水动力事件,以实现避障和目标检测。在本文中,我们全面回顾和比较了十种用于 ALLs 的定位算法。由于研究领域、传感器敏感轴和可用数据的差异,这些算法无法在其原始工作中进行公平比较。我们将它们与我们的新正交法(QM)进行了比较,该方法基于 2D 敏感 ALLs 的特定几何性质。我们展示了每个算法能够准确确定模拟偶极子源位置和方向的区域如何受到(1)训练和优化数据的数量以及(2)传感器的敏感轴的影响。总体而言,我们发现每个算法都受益于 2D 敏感传感器,而交替敏感轴是第二佳配置。在机器学习方法中,MLP 需要一个不切实际的大型训练集才能接近基于优化的算法的性能。无论数据集大小如何,QM 都能在具有较大准确预测区域和较小大误差尾部的情况下表现最佳。