Mulac Alma, Mathiesen Liv, Taxis Katja, Gerd Granås Anne
Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Dec;30(12):1021-1030. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013223. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
Barcode medication administration (BCMA) can, if poorly implemented, cause disrupted workflow, increased workload and cause medication errors. Further exploration is needed of the causes of BCMA policy deviations.
To gain an insight into nurses' use of barcode technology during medication dispensing and administration; to record the number and type of BCMA policy deviations, and to investigate their causes.
We conducted a prospective, mixed-methods study. Medication administration rounds on two hospital wards were observed using a digital tool and field notes. The SEIPS (Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety) model was used to analyse the data.
We observed 44 nurses administering 884 medications to 213 patients. We identified BCMA policy deviations for more than half of the observations; these related to the level of tasks, organisation, technology, environment and nurses. Task-related policy deviations occurred with 140 patients (66%) during dispensing and 152 patients (71%) during administration. Organisational deviations included failure to scan 29% of medications and 20% of patient's wristbands. Policy deviations also arose due to technological factors (eg, low laptop battery, system freezing), as well as environmental factors (eg, medication room location, patient drawer size). Most deviations were caused by policies that interfere with proper and safe BCMA use and suboptimal technology design.
Our findings indicate that adaptations of the work system are needed, particularly in relation to policies and technology, to optimise the use of BCMA by nurses during medication dispensing and administration. These adaptations should lead to enhanced patient safety, as the absolute goal with BCMA implementation.
如果实施不当,条形码给药系统(BCMA)可能会导致工作流程中断、工作量增加并引发用药错误。需要进一步探究BCMA政策偏差的原因。
深入了解护士在配药和给药过程中对条形码技术的使用情况;记录BCMA政策偏差的数量和类型,并调查其原因。
我们开展了一项前瞻性的混合方法研究。使用数字工具和现场记录观察了两个医院病房的给药过程。采用SEIPS(患者安全系统工程倡议)模型对数据进行分析。
我们观察了44名护士为213名患者 administer 884剂药物。我们发现超过一半的观察存在BCMA政策偏差;这些偏差与任务、组织、技术、环境和护士等层面有关。与任务相关的政策偏差在配药时有140名患者(66%)出现,给药时有152名患者(71%)出现。组织层面的偏差包括29%的药物和20%的患者腕带未进行扫描。政策偏差还因技术因素(如笔记本电脑电池电量低、系统冻结)以及环境因素(如配药室位置、患者抽屉大小)而产生。大多数偏差是由干扰BCMA正确和安全使用的政策以及技术设计欠佳导致的。
我们的研究结果表明,需要对工作系统进行调整,尤其是在政策和技术方面,以优化护士在配药和给药过程中对BCMA的使用。这些调整应能提高患者安全,这是实施BCMA的绝对目标。 (注:administer这个词在原文中未完整给出英文解释,根据语境推测为“给药”之类的意思)