Otusanya Olufisayo T, Hsieh S Jean, Gong Michelle Ng, Gershengorn Hayley B
Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Critical Care and Environmental Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Piedmont Henry Hospital, Stockbridge, GA, USA.
J Intensive Care Med. 2022 Jun;37(6):833-841. doi: 10.1177/08850666211031813. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
To measure the impact of full versus partial ABCDE bundle implementation on specific cost centers and related resource utilization.
Retrospective cohort study.
Two medical ICUs within Montefiore Health System (Bronx, NY).
Four hundred and seventy-two mechanically ventilated patients admitted to the medical ICUs during a hospitalization which began and ended between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2013.
The full (A)wakening, (B)reathing, (C)oordination, (D)elirium Monitoring/Management and (E)arly Mobilization bundle was implemented in the intervention ICU while a portion of the bundle (A, B, and D components) was implemented in the comparison ICU.
Relative to the comparison ICU, implementation of the entire bundle in the intervention ICU was associated with a 27.3% (95% CI: 9.9%, 41.3%; = 0.004) decrease in total hospital laboratory costs and a 2,888.6% (95% CI: 77.9%, 50,113.2%; = 0.018) increase in total hospital physical therapy costs. Cost of total hospital medications, diagnostic radiology and respiratory therapy were unchanged. Relative to the comparison ICU, total hospital resource use decreased in the intervention ICU (incidence rate ratio [95% CI], laboratory: 0.68 [0.54, 0.87], = 0.002; diagnostic radiology: 0.75 [0.59, 0.96], = 0.020).
Full ABCDE bundle implementation resulted in a decrease in total hospital laboratory costs and total hospital laboratory and diagnostic resource utilization while leading to an increase in physical therapy costs.
评估全面实施与部分实施ABCDE集束化治疗对特定成本中心及相关资源利用的影响。
回顾性队列研究。
蒙特菲奥里医疗系统(纽约州布朗克斯)内的两个内科重症监护病房。
2013年1月1日至2013年12月31日期间入住内科重症监护病房的472例机械通气患者,其住院起始和结束均在此期间。
在干预重症监护病房实施全面的(A)唤醒、(B)呼吸、(C)协调、(D)谵妄监测/管理和(E)早期活动集束化治疗,而在对照重症监护病房实施该集束化治疗的一部分(A、B和D部分)。
与对照重症监护病房相比,干预重症监护病房全面实施集束化治疗使医院总实验室成本降低了27.3%(95%CI:9.9%,41.3%;P = 0.004),医院总物理治疗成本增加了2888.6%(95%CI:77.9%,50113.2%;P = 0.018)。医院总药物成本、诊断性放射学成本和呼吸治疗成本未发生变化。与对照重症监护病房相比,干预重症监护病房的医院总资源使用减少(发生率比[95%CI],实验室:0.68[0.54,0.87],P = 0.002;诊断性放射学:0.75[0.59,0.96],P = 0.020)。
全面实施ABCDE集束化治疗可降低医院总实验室成本以及医院总实验室和诊断资源的利用,同时导致物理治疗成本增加。