Groupement d'intérêt scientifique Epidémiologie des produits de santé, L'Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé -Caisse Nationale de l'Assurance Maladie, Paris, France.
Epidémiologie en Dermatologie et Evaluation des Thérapeutiques, Université Paris-Est Creteil, Créteil, France.
JAMA Dermatol. 2021 Sep 1;157(9):1056-1065. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.2599.
Biologics and targeted therapies, such as apremilast, are efficient treatments to manage moderate to severe psoriasis. More information about the risk of serious infection is needed for the newest treatment options in a real-world setting.
To assess the risk of serious infection among biologics and apremilast used to treat psoriasis, with etanercept as the comparator.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This nationwide cohort study from France involved data from the National Health Data System covering approximately 99% of the French population. All adults with psoriasis, defined as receiving at least 2 prescriptions of a topical vitamin D derivative within a 2-year period, registered in the database between January 1, 2008, and May 31, 2019, were eligible. The study population included those who were new users of biologic agents or apremilast (ie, without any prescriptions of a biologic or apremilast during the previous year). Patients with HIV infection or a history of cancer, transplant, or serious infection were excluded. End of follow-up was January 31, 2020.
The primary end point was a serious infection in a time-to-event analysis using propensity score-weighted Cox proportional hazards regression models, estimating weighted hazard ratios (wHRs) and 95% CIs.
A total of 44 239 new users of biologic treatment were identified (mean [SD] age, 48.4 [13.8] years; 22 866 [51.7%] men; median follow-up, 12 months [interquartile range, 7-24 months]). A total of 29 618 (66.9%) were prescribed a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor first, 6658 (15.0%) an interleukin (IL) 12/23 inhibitor, 4093 (9.3%) an IL-17 inhibitor, 526 (1.2%) an IL-23 inhibitor, and 3344 (7.6%) apremilast. The total number of serious infections was 1656, and the overall crude incidence rate was 25.0 (95% CI, 23.8-26.2) per 1000 person-years. The most frequent serious infections were gastrointestinal infections (645 patients [38.9%]). After adjusting for time-dependent covariables, risk of serious infections was higher for new users of adalimumab (wHR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.07-1.38) or infliximab (wHR, 1.79; 95% CI 1.49-2.16) vs etanercept, whereas ustekinumab was associated with a lower risk of having a serious infection (wHR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.67-0.94). Risk of serious infections was not increased for new users of IL-17 and the IL-23 inhibitor guselkumab or apremilast vs etanercept. Risk of serious infections was increased with concomitant nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or systemic corticosteroids.
In this cohort study of individuals with moderate to severe psoriasis, risk of serious infections was increased in new users of infliximab and adalimumab vs etanercept, whereas ustekinumab users had lower risk of having a serious infection but not new users of IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors or apremilast. Other observational studies are needed to confirm results for the most recent drugs.
生物制剂和靶向治疗药物(如阿普司特)是治疗中度至重度银屑病的有效方法。在真实环境下,对于最新的治疗方案,需要更多有关严重感染风险的信息。
评估在法国全国范围内,生物制剂和阿普司特治疗银屑病的严重感染风险,以依那西普作为对照。
设计、设置和参与者:这项来自法国的全国性队列研究,使用了国家健康数据系统的数据,该系统覆盖了大约 99%的法国人口。所有患有银屑病的成年人,其定义为在数据库中登记的至少在 2 年内接受 2 次局部维生素 D 衍生物处方的患者,符合条件。研究人群包括新使用生物制剂或阿普司特的患者(即在过去一年中没有任何生物制剂或阿普司特处方的患者)。患有 HIV 感染或癌症、移植或严重感染病史的患者被排除在外。随访于 2020 年 1 月 31 日结束。
主要终点是采用倾向评分加权 Cox 比例风险回归模型的时间事件分析中的严重感染,估计加权风险比(wHR)和 95%置信区间。
共确定了 44239 名新使用生物治疗的患者(平均[标准差]年龄,48.4[13.8]岁;22866[51.7%]为男性;中位随访时间,12 个月[四分位距,7-24 个月])。29618 名(66.9%)患者首先被开处肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂,6658 名(15.0%)被开处白细胞介素(IL)12/23 抑制剂,4093 名(9.3%)被开处 IL-17 抑制剂,526 名(1.2%)被开处 IL-23 抑制剂,3344 名(7.6%)被开处阿普司特。共有 1656 例严重感染,总发病率为 25.0(95%CI,23.8-26.2)/1000 人年。最常见的严重感染是胃肠道感染(645 例[38.9%])。在调整了时间依赖性协变量后,阿达木单抗(wHR,1.22;95%CI,1.07-1.38)或英夫利昔单抗(wHR,1.79;95%CI,1.49-2.16)使用者与依那西普相比,严重感染的风险更高,而乌司奴单抗使用者严重感染的风险较低(wHR,0.79;95%CI,0.67-0.94)。与依那西普相比,IL-17 和 IL-23 抑制剂古塞库单抗或阿普司特的新使用者发生严重感染的风险并未增加。同时使用非甾体抗炎药或全身皮质类固醇与严重感染风险增加有关。
在这项对中度至重度银屑病患者的队列研究中,与依那西普相比,使用英夫利昔单抗和阿达木单抗的患者发生严重感染的风险增加,而乌司奴单抗使用者发生严重感染的风险较低,但 IL-17 和 IL-23 抑制剂或阿普司特的新使用者除外。需要其他观察性研究来证实最新药物的结果。