NIHR Global Health Research Unit On Health in Situations of Fragility, Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK.
BMC Psychol. 2021 Jul 21;9(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00610-w.
Studies of psychological distress in Sierra Leone have typically used measures which were developed for use in other contexts, and which often have not been adapted or validated for use in Sierra Leone. This has resulted in a lack of reliable information about the patterns of psychological distress within the population, which is a barrier to the development of effective and appropriate mental health services. The aim of the study was to develop a locally-appropriate measure of psychological distress for Sierra Leone.
The new measure consists of two instruments: the Sierra Leone Psychological Distress Scale (SLPDS) and a gendered measure of ability to carry out daily tasks-a Function scale-as an indication of the severity of distress. A three-phase mixed methods exploratory sequential study was conducted. Phase 1 was item generation and testing, leading to the development of a set of potential items for both instruments. Phase 2 was a small pilot study (N = 202) leading to the selection of the final set of items for both measures. Phase 3 was a validation phase where the SLPDS and the Function scale were administered with a larger sample of 904 respondents. Item analysis was used to assess the internal consistency of the scales, and Exploratory Factor Analysis to explore the properties of the SLPDS.
Exploratory factor analysis using the principal axis factoring with an oblique rotation identified a three-factor structure for the 18-item SLPDS. Internal consistency for the SLPDS (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89) and three subscales was good (Cronbach's alpha > 0.73). The internal reliability of the male and female versions of the Function scale was also found to be acceptable (Cronbach's alpha = 0.90 for the female scale and 0.79 for the male scale).
Together the SLPD and Function scales provide a locally-validated tool which will enable government bodies and local and international non-governmental organisations in Sierra Leone to assess mental health and psychosocial needs. This will support both effective service provision and the evaluation of initiatives designed to improve mental health and psychosocial wellbeing.
塞拉利昂的心理学研究通常使用在其他环境中开发的措施,这些措施通常没有针对塞拉利昂进行调整或验证。这导致了缺乏有关人群中心理困扰模式的可靠信息,这是开发有效和适当的心理健康服务的障碍。该研究的目的是为塞拉利昂开发一种适应当地情况的心理困扰衡量标准。
新的衡量标准由两个工具组成:塞拉利昂心理困扰量表(SLPDS)和衡量完成日常任务能力的性别化工具-功能量表-作为困扰严重程度的指标。进行了一个三阶段混合方法探索性序贯研究。第 1 阶段是项目生成和测试,由此产生了两套仪器的一套潜在项目。第 2 阶段是一项小型试点研究(N=202),最终确定了两种测量方法的最终项目集。第 3 阶段是验证阶段,在该阶段对 904 名受访者进行了 SLPDS 和功能量表的评估。项目分析用于评估量表的内部一致性,探索性因素分析用于探索 SLPDS 的特性。
使用主轴因子分析和斜旋转的探索性因素分析确定了 18 项 SLPDS 的三因素结构。SLPDS(Cronbach's alpha=0.89)和三个子量表的内部一致性良好(Cronbach's alpha>0.73)。男性和女性功能量表的内部可靠性也被认为是可以接受的(女性量表的 Cronbach's alpha=0.90,男性量表的 Cronbach's alpha=0.79)。
SLPD 和功能量表一起提供了一种经过验证的工具,使塞拉利昂的政府机构以及当地和国际非政府组织能够评估心理健康和心理社会需求。这将支持有效的服务提供,并评估旨在改善心理健康和心理社会福利的举措。