Suppr超能文献

在日本人群中对简化的院外心脏骤停和心脏骤停医院预后评分进行外部验证:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。

External validation of simplified out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and cardiac arrest hospital prognosis scores in a Japanese population: a multicentre retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Tertiary Emergency Medical Center, Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital, Sumida-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Tertiary Emergency Medical Center, Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital, Sumida-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2022 Feb;39(2):124-131. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-210103. Epub 2021 Jul 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The novel simplified out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (sOHCA) and simplified cardiac arrest hospital prognosis (sCAHP) scores used for prognostication of hospitalised patients have not been externally validated. Therefore, this study aimed to externally validate the sOHCA and sCAHP scores in a Japanese population.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed data from a prospectively maintained Japanese database (January 2012 to March 2013). We identified adult patients who had been resuscitated and hospitalised after intrinsic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) (n=2428, age ≥18 years). We validated the sOHCA and sCAHP scores with reference to the original scores in predicting 1-month unfavourable neurological outcomes (cerebral performance categories 3-5) based on the discrimination and calibration measures of area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) and a Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test with a calibration plot, respectively.

RESULTS

In total, 1985/2484 (82%) patients had a 1-month unfavourable neurological outcome. The original OHCA, sOHCA, original cardiac arrest hospital prognosis (CAHP) and sCAHP scores were available for 855/2428 (35%), 1359/2428 (56%), 1130/2428 (47%) and 1834/2428 (76%) patients, respectively. The AUCs of simplified scores did not differ significantly from those of the original scores, whereas the AUC of the sCAHP score was significantly higher than that of the sOHCA score (0.88 vs 0.81, p<0.001). The goodness of fit was poor in the sOHCA score (ν=8, χ=19.1 and Hosmer-Lemeshow test: p=0.014) but not in the sCAHP score (ν=8, χ=13.5 and Hosmer-Lemeshow test: p=0.10).

CONCLUSION

The performances of the original and simplified OHCA and CAHP scores in predicting neurological outcomes in successfully resuscitated OHCA patients were acceptable. With the highest availability, similar discrimination and good calibration, the sCAHP score has promising potential for clinical implementation, although further validation studies to evaluate its clinical acceptance are necessary.

摘要

背景

用于预测住院患者预后的新型简化院外心脏骤停(sOHCA)和简化心脏骤停医院预后(sCAHP)评分尚未经过外部验证。因此,本研究旨在日本人群中验证 sOHCA 和 sCAHP 评分。

方法

我们回顾性分析了一个前瞻性维持的日本数据库(2012 年 1 月至 2013 年 3 月)中的数据。我们确定了患有内在院外心脏骤停(OHCA)后接受复苏并住院的成年患者(n=2428 例,年龄≥18 岁)。我们使用区分度和校准度的接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)以及 Hosmer-Lemeshow 拟合优度检验和校准图来验证 sOHCA 和 sCAHP 评分,以原始评分预测 1 个月不良神经结局(脑功能分类 3-5)。

结果

共有 1985/2484(82%)例患者发生 1 个月不良神经结局。原始 OHCA、sOHCA、原始心脏骤停医院预后(CAHP)和 sCAHP 评分分别可用于 855/2428(35%)、1359/2428(56%)、1130/2428(47%)和 1834/2428(76%)例患者。简化评分的 AUC 与原始评分无显著差异,而 sCAHP 评分的 AUC 显著高于 sOHCA 评分(0.88 与 0.81,p<0.001)。sOHCA 评分的拟合优度较差(ν=8,χ=19.1,Hosmer-Lemeshow 检验:p=0.014),而 sCAHP 评分的拟合优度不差(ν=8,χ=13.5,Hosmer-Lemeshow 检验:p=0.10)。

结论

在成功复苏的 OHCA 患者中,原始和简化 OHCA 和 CAHP 评分预测神经结局的性能可接受。sCAHP 评分具有最高的可用性、相似的区分度和良好的校准度,具有潜在的临床应用前景,尽管需要进一步验证研究来评估其临床接受程度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验