Suppr超能文献

比较不同临床风险评分以预测成人心脏骤停后的长期生存和神经功能结局:一项前瞻性队列研究的结果

Comparison of different clinical risk scores to predict long-term survival and neurological outcome in adults after cardiac arrest: results from a prospective cohort study.

作者信息

Blatter René, Amacher Simon A, Bohren Chantal, Becker Christoph, Beck Katharina, Gross Sebastian, Tisljar Kai, Sutter Raoul, Marsch Stephan, Hunziker Sabina

机构信息

Medical Communication and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 23, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.

Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Ann Intensive Care. 2022 Aug 17;12(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s13613-022-01048-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several scoring systems have been used to predict short-term outcome in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), including the disease-specific OHCA and CAHP (Cardiac Arrest Hospital Prognosis) scores, as well as the general severity-of-illness scores Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II). This study aimed to assess the prognostic performance of these four scores to predict long-term outcomes (≥ 2 years) in adult cardiac arrest patients.

METHODS

This is a prospective single-centre cohort study including consecutive cardiac arrest patients admitted to intensive care in a Swiss tertiary academic medical centre. The primary endpoint was 2-year mortality. Secondary endpoints were neurological outcome at 2 years post-arrest assessed by Cerebral Performance Category with CPC 1-2 defined as good and CPC 3-5 as poor neurological outcome, and 6-year mortality.

RESULTS

In 415 patients admitted to intensive care, the 2-year mortality was 58.1%, with 96.7% of survivors showing good neurological outcome. The 6-year mortality was 82.5%. All four scores showed good discriminatory performance for 2-year mortality, with areas under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) of 0.82, 0.87, 0.83 and 0.81 for the OHCA, CAHP, APACHE II and SAPS II scores. The results were similar for poor neurological outcome at 2 years and 6-year mortality.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that two established cardiac arrest-specific scores and two severity-of-illness scores provide good prognostic value to predict long-term outcome after cardiac arrest and thus may help in early goals-of-care discussions.

摘要

背景

已有多种评分系统用于预测院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者的短期预后,包括疾病特异性的OHCA评分和CAHP(心脏骤停医院预后)评分,以及一般疾病严重程度评分急性生理与慢性健康状况评估II(APACHE II)和简化急性生理评分II(SAPS II)。本研究旨在评估这四种评分对预测成年心脏骤停患者长期预后(≥2年)的性能。

方法

这是一项前瞻性单中心队列研究,纳入了瑞士一家三级学术医疗中心重症监护病房收治的连续心脏骤停患者。主要终点是2年死亡率。次要终点是心脏骤停后2年的神经功能结局,采用脑功能分类(CPC)评估,CPC 1 - 2定义为良好神经功能结局,CPC 3 - 5为不良神经功能结局,以及6年死亡率。

结果

在415例入住重症监护病房的患者中,2年死亡率为58.1%,96.7%的幸存者神经功能结局良好。6年死亡率为82.5%。所有四种评分对2年死亡率均显示出良好的区分性能,OHCA、CAHP、APACHE II和SAPS II评分的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)分别为0.82、0.87、0.83和0.81。对于2年不良神经功能结局和6年死亡率,结果相似。

结论

本研究表明,两种既定的心脏骤停特异性评分和两种疾病严重程度评分对预测心脏骤停后的长期预后具有良好的预后价值,因此可能有助于早期的治疗目标讨论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f78b/9385915/14d817ff073c/13613_2022_1048_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

2
Performance of clinical risk scores to predict mortality and neurological outcome in cardiac arrest patients.
Resuscitation. 2019 Mar;136:21-29. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.10.022. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
7
Neurological outcome following out of hospital cardiac arrest: Evaluation of performance of existing risk prediction models in a UK cohort.
J Intensive Care Soc. 2023 Dec 21;25(2):131-139. doi: 10.1177/17511437231214146. eCollection 2024 May.
10
Performance on the APACHE II, SAPS II, SOFA and the OHCA score of post-cardiac arrest patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia.
PLoS One. 2018 May 3;13(5):e0196197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196197. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

6
Prediction of outcomes after cardiac arrest by a generative artificial intelligence model.
Resusc Plus. 2024 Feb 22;18:100587. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100587. eCollection 2024 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Trauma-induced coagulopathy.
Intensive Care Med. 2022 Nov;48(11):1642-1645. doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06834-7. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
2
Long-term Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
JAMA Cardiol. 2022 Jun 1;7(6):633-643. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.0795.
4
Simultaneous external validation of various cardiac arrest prognostic scores: a single-center retrospective study.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Aug 14;29(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00935-w.
6
Performance of OHCA, NULL-PLEASE and CAHP scores to predict survival in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest due to acute coronary syndrome.
Resuscitation. 2021 Sep;166:31-37. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.07.011. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
9
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Epidemiology of cardiac arrest in Europe.
Resuscitation. 2021 Apr;161:61-79. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.007. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
10
European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine guidelines 2021: post-resuscitation care.
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Apr;47(4):369-421. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06368-4. Epub 2021 Mar 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验