Suppr超能文献

直肠癌治疗中保肛率的医院差异:荷兰基于人群的研究结果。

Hospital variation in sphincter-preservation rates in rectal cancer treatment: results of a population-based study in the Netherlands.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, Maasziekenhuis Pantein, Boxmeer, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BJS Open. 2021 Jul 6;5(4). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab065.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to examine the sphincter-preservation rate variations in rectal cancer surgery. The influence of hospital volume on sphincter-preservation rates and short-term outcomes (anastomotic leakage (AL), positive circumferential resection margin (CRM), 30- and 90-day mortality rates) were also analysed.

METHODS

Non-metastasized rectal cancer patients treated between 2009 and 2016 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Surgical procedures were divided into sphincter-preserving surgery and an end colostomy group. Multivariable logistic regression models were generated to estimate the probability of undergoing sphincter-preserving surgery according to the hospital of surgery and tumour height (low, 5 cm or less, mid, more than 5 cm to 10 cm, and high, more than 10 cm). The influence of annual hospital volume (less than 20, 20-39, more than 40 resections) on sphincter-preservation rate and short-term outcomes was also examined.

RESULTS

A total of 20 959 patients were included (11 611 sphincter preservation and 8079 end colostomy) and the observed median sphincter-preservation rate in low, mid and high rectal cancer was 29.3, 75.6 and 87.9 per cent respectively. After case-mix adjustment, hospital of surgery was a significant factor for patients' likelihood for sphincter preservation in all three subgroups (P < 0.001). In mid rectal cancer, borderline higher rates of sphincter preservation were associated with low-volume hospitals (odds ratio 1.20, 95 per cent c.i. 1.01 to 1.43). No significant association between annual hospital volume and sphincter-preservation rate in low and high rectal cancer nor short-term outcomes (AL, positive CRM rate and 30- and 90-day mortality rates) was identified.

CONCLUSION

This population-based study showed a significant hospital variation in sphincter-preservation rates in rectal surgery. The annual hospital volume, however, was not associated with sphincter-preservation rates in low, and high rectal cancer nor with other short-term outcomes.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨直肠癌手术中保肛率的变化。还分析了医院容量对保肛率和短期结果(吻合口漏(AL)、阳性环周切缘(CRM)、30 天和 90 天死亡率)的影响。

方法

从荷兰癌症登记处选择了 2009 年至 2016 年间治疗的非转移性直肠癌患者。手术分为保肛手术和结肠造口术组。多变量逻辑回归模型用于根据手术医院和肿瘤高度(低位,5cm 或以下;中位,5cm 至 10cm 之间;高位,10cm 以上)估计接受保肛手术的概率。还检查了每年医院容量(<20、20-39、>40 例)对保肛率和短期结果的影响。

结果

共纳入 20959 例患者(11611 例保肛和 8079 例结肠造口术),低位、中位和高位直肠癌的观察保肛率中位数分别为 29.3%、75.6%和 87.9%。在病例混合调整后,手术医院是所有三个亚组中患者保肛可能性的重要因素(P<0.001)。在中位直肠癌中,保肛率略高与低容量医院相关(优势比 1.20,95%置信区间 1.01 至 1.43)。未发现年度医院容量与低位和高位直肠癌保肛率以及短期结果(AL、阳性 CRM 率以及 30 天和 90 天死亡率)之间存在显著相关性。

结论

这项基于人群的研究表明,直肠癌手术中保肛率存在显著的医院差异。然而,年度医院容量与低位和高位直肠癌的保肛率以及其他短期结果无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c33/8295312/3d007e99a724/zrab065f5.jpg

相似文献

4
No difference between lowest and highest volume hospitals in outcome after colorectal cancer surgery in the southern Netherlands.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013 Nov;39(11):1199-206. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.08.020. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
5
[Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival in mid-to-low rectal cancer].
Chirurg. 2015 Nov;86(11):1072-82. doi: 10.1007/s00104-015-0090-0.
6
[Risk factors of anastomotic leakage after robotic surgery for low and mid rectal cancer].
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 25;23(4):364-369. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20200212-00052.
7
The influence of hospital volume on long-term oncological outcome after rectal cancer surgery.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Dec;32(12):1741-1747. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2889-2. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
8
Patient and hospital factors associated with use of sphincter-sparing surgery for rectal cancer.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Feb;53(2):115-20. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181bc98a1.
9
[Rectum-preserving surgery after consolidation neoadjuvant therapy or totally neoadjuvant therapy for low rectal cancer: a preliminary report].
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Mar 25;23(3):281-288. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20200228-00096.

本文引用的文献

1
Patients' preferences for sphincter preservation versus abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer.
Surgery. 2021 Mar;169(3):623-628. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.07.020. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
4
Hospital volume and outcome in rectal cancer patients; results of a population-based study in the Netherlands.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Apr;45(4):613-619. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.12.018. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
5
Long-term Outcomes After Surgery Involving the Pelvic Floor in Rectal Cancer: Physical Activity, Quality of Life, and Health Status.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Apr;23(4):808-817. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-4014-4. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
6
Anterior resection for rectal cancer in Sweden: validation of a registry-based method to determine long-term stoma outcome.
Acta Oncol. 2018 Dec;57(12):1631-1638. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2018.1521988. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
9
Achievements in colorectal cancer care during 8 years of auditing in The Netherlands.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Sep;44(9):1361-1370. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
10
The influence of hospital volume on long-term oncological outcome after rectal cancer surgery.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Dec;32(12):1741-1747. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2889-2. Epub 2017 Sep 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验