• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Examining the Role of Family History of US Enslavement in Health Care System Distrust Today.考察美国奴隶制家族史在当今医疗保健系统不信任中的作用。
Ethn Dis. 2021 Jul 15;31(3):417-424. doi: 10.18865/ed.31.3.417. eCollection 2021 Summer.
2
Prior experiences of racial discrimination and racial differences in health care system distrust.先前经历的种族歧视和对医疗保健系统的不信任的种族差异。
Med Care. 2013 Feb;51(2):144-50. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31827310a1.
3
Differences in the patterns of health care system distrust between blacks and whites.黑人和白人在医疗保健系统不信任模式上的差异。
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jun;23(6):827-33. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0561-9. Epub 2008 Feb 26.
4
Critical race theory as a tool for understanding poor engagement along the HIV care continuum among African American/Black and Hispanic persons living with HIV in the United States: a qualitative exploration.批判种族理论作为理解美国非裔/黑人及西班牙裔艾滋病毒感染者在艾滋病毒护理连续过程中参与度低的一种工具:一项定性探索。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Mar 24;16(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0549-3.
5
An exploratory study of how trust in health care institutions varies across African American, Hispanic and white populations.一项关于非裔美国人、西班牙裔和白人对医疗机构的信任度如何存在差异的探索性研究。
Commun Med. 2011;8(1):89-98. doi: 10.1558/cam.v8i1.89.
6
Different types of distrust in clinical research among whites and African Americans.白人和非裔美国人对临床研究的不同类型的不信任。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2011 Feb;103(2):123-30. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30261-3.
7
Untangling the associations among distrust, race, and neighborhood social environment: a social disorganization perspective.解开不信任、种族和邻里社会环境之间的关联:社会失序视角。
Soc Sci Med. 2012 May;74(9):1342-52. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.01.012. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
8
Race, medical researcher distrust, perceived harm, and willingness to participate in cardiovascular prevention trials.种族、对医学研究人员的不信任、感知到的危害以及参与心血管预防试验的意愿。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2008 Jan;87(1):1-9. doi: 10.1097/MD.0b013e3181625d78.
9
The influence of health care policies and health care system distrust on willingness to undergo genetic testing.医疗政策和医疗体系不信任对基因检测意愿的影响。
Med Care. 2012 May;50(5):381-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31824d748b.
10
Racial differences in parents' distrust of medicine and research.父母对医学和研究不信任方面的种族差异。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Feb;163(2):108-14. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2008.521.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Affordable Care Act Provisions on the Racial Makeup of Patients Enrolled at a Deep South, High-Risk Breast Cancer Clinic.《平价医疗法案》条款对美国最南部一家高风险乳腺癌诊所登记患者种族构成的影响
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Sep 5. doi: 10.1007/s40615-024-02104-y.
2
Impact of Affordable Care Act provisions on the racial makeup of patients enrolled at a Deep South, high-risk breast cancer clinic.《平价医疗法案》条款对美国最南部一家高风险乳腺癌诊所登记患者种族构成的影响
Res Sq. 2023 Oct 24:rs.3.rs-3359906. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3359906/v1.
3
The 5Ws of Racial Equity in Research: A Framework for Applying a Racial Equity Lens Throughout the Research Process.研究中种族平等的5个W:在整个研究过程中应用种族平等视角的框架。
Health Equity. 2022 Dec 16;6(1):917-921. doi: 10.1089/heq.2022.0042. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Using Mistrust, Distrust, and Low Trust Precisely in Medical Care and Medical Research Advances Health Equity.在医疗保健和医学研究中精准运用不信任、怀疑和低信任度可促进健康公平。
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Mar;60(3):442-445. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.08.019. Epub 2020 Nov 15.
2
Reparations as a Public Health Priority - A Strategy for Ending Black-White Health Disparities.将赔偿作为公共卫生优先事项——消除黑人和白人健康差距的战略
N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 26;383(22):2101-2103. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2026170. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
3
Comparison of Early Life Obesity-Related Risk and Protective Factors in Non-Hispanic Black Subgroups.非裔美国人亚组中与早期生命肥胖相关的风险和保护因素的比较。
Matern Child Health J. 2020 Sep;24(9):1130-1137. doi: 10.1007/s10995-020-02979-3.
4
Comparison of Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors Among African Immigrants and African Americans: An Analysis of the 2010 to 2016 National Health Interview Surveys.非洲移民与非裔美国人心血管疾病风险因素比较:2010 年至 2016 年全国健康访谈调查分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Mar 3;9(5):e013220. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013220. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
5
Towards a More Inclusive and Dynamic Understanding of Medical Mistrust Informed by Science.从科学角度理解更具包容性和活力的医学不信任
Behav Med. 2019 Apr-Jun;45(2):79-85. doi: 10.1080/08964289.2019.1619511.
6
Healthcare System Distrust, Physician Trust, and Patient Discordance with Adjuvant Breast Cancer Treatment Recommendations.医疗体系不信任、医生信任度与患者对辅助性乳腺癌治疗建议的分歧
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 Dec;26(12):1745-1752. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0479. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
7
Effect of the Affordable Care Act on Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Insurance Coverage.《平价医疗法案》对医疗保险覆盖范围中种族和族裔差异的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2016 Aug;106(8):1416-21. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303155. Epub 2016 May 19.
8
Examining the complexity and variation of health care system distrust across neighborhoods: Implications for preventive health care.审视不同社区医疗保健系统不信任的复杂性和差异:对预防性医疗保健的影响。
Res Sociol Health Care. 2015;33:43-66. doi: 10.1108/S0275-495920150000033003.
9
Diabetes among US- and foreign-born blacks in the USA.美国本土和外国出生的黑人中的糖尿病情况。
Ethn Health. 2016;21(1):71-84. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2015.1010490. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
10
Does health coaching change patients' trust in their primary care provider?健康指导能否改变患者对其初级保健提供者的信任?
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Jul;96(1):135-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.03.018. Epub 2014 Apr 2.

考察美国奴隶制家族史在当今医疗保健系统不信任中的作用。

Examining the Role of Family History of US Enslavement in Health Care System Distrust Today.

机构信息

Departments of Epidemiology, Health Policy & Management, and Hopkins Center for Health Disparities Solutions at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.

Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

Ethn Dis. 2021 Jul 15;31(3):417-424. doi: 10.18865/ed.31.3.417. eCollection 2021 Summer.

DOI:10.18865/ed.31.3.417
PMID:34295129
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8288475/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Black/African American people have long reported high, albeit warranted, distrust of the US health care system (HCS); however, Blacks/African Americans are not a homogenous racial/ethnic group. Little information is available on how the subgroup of Black Americans whose families suffered under US chattel slavery, here called Descendants of Africans Enslaved in the United States (DAEUS), view health care institutions. We compared knowledge of unethical treatment and HCS distrust among DAEUS and non-DAEUS.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A cross-sectional random-digit dialing survey was administered in 2005 to Blacks/African Americans, aged 21-75 years, from the University of Pennsylvania Clinical Practices in Philadelphia, Penn.

PARTICIPANTS

Blacks/African Americans self-reported a family history of persons enslaved in the US (DAEUS) or no family history of persons enslaved in the US (non-DAEUS).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

HCS distrust was measured by a validated scale assessing perceptions of unethical experimentation and active or passive discrimination.

METHODS

We compared responses to the HCS distrust scale using Fisher's exact and t-tests.

RESULTS

Of 89 respondents, 57% self-reported being DAEUS. A greater percentage of DAEUS reported knowledge of unethical treatment than non-DAEUS (56% vs 21%; P<.001), were significantly more likely to express distrust, and to endorse the presence of covert (eg, insurance-based) than overt forms (eg, race-based) of discrimination by the HCS.

CONCLUSIONS

DAEUS express greater HCS distrust than non-DAEUS, patterned by awareness of unethical treatment and passive discrimination. Understanding how long-term exposure to US institutions influences health is critical to resolving disparities for all Black/African American groups. Rectifying past injustices through reparative institutional measures may improve DAEUS' trust and engagement with the US HCS.

摘要

目的

长期以来,非裔美国人对美国医疗保健系统(HCS)表现出高度的、尽管有理由的不信任;然而,黑人/非裔美国人并不是一个同质的种族/民族群体。关于在美国被奴役的非裔美国人的后裔(DAEUS)如何看待医疗保健机构的信息很少。我们比较了 DAEUS 和非 DAEUS 对不道德治疗和 HCS 不信任的认识。

设计和设置

2005 年,在宾夕法尼亚大学费城临床实践中,对年龄在 21-75 岁之间的黑人/非裔美国人进行了横断面随机拨号调查。

参与者

黑人/非裔美国人自我报告有家庭在美国被奴役的历史(DAEUS)或没有家庭在美国被奴役的历史(非 DAEUS)。

主要观察指标

HCS 不信任通过评估对不道德实验和主动或被动歧视的看法的验证量表来衡量。

方法

我们使用 Fisher 的精确检验和 t 检验比较了对 HCS 不信任量表的反应。

结果

在 89 名受访者中,57%的人自我报告为 DAEUS。与非 DAEUS 相比,更多的 DAEUS 报告了对不道德治疗的了解(56%比 21%;P<.001),更有可能表达不信任,并支持 HCS 存在隐蔽(例如,基于保险)而不是公开(例如,基于种族)的歧视形式。

结论

DAEUS 对 HCS 的不信任程度高于非 DAEUS,这与对不道德治疗和被动歧视的认识有关。了解长期接触美国机构如何影响健康,对于解决所有黑人/非裔美国人群体的差异至关重要。通过修复性的机构措施纠正过去的不公正行为,可以改善 DAEUS 对美国 HCS 的信任和参与。